OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacotherapy associated with the provision of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to patients with end-stage heart failure and guidance regarding the selection, assessment, and optimization of drug therapy for this population. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1960 to July 2010 for articles published in English using the search terms mechanical circulatory support, ventricular assist system, ventricular assist device, left ventricular assist device, right ventricular assist device, biventricular assist device, total artificial heart, pulsatile, positive displacement, axial, centrifugal, hemostasis, bleeding, hemodynamic, blood pressure, thrombosis, antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, right ventricular failure, ventricular arrhythmia, anemia, arteriovenous malformation, stroke, infection, and clinical pharmacist. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant original studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and reviews were assessed for inclusion. References from pertinent articles were examined for content not found during the initial search. DATA SYNTHESIS: MCS has advanced significantly since the first left ventricular assist device was implanted in 1966. Further advancements in MCS technology that occurred in the latter decade are changing the overall management of endstage heart failure care and cardiac transplantation. These pumps allow for improved bridge-to-transplant rates, enhanced survival, and quality of life. Pharmacotherapy associated with MCS devices may optimize the performance of the pumps and improve patient outcomes, as well as minimize morbidity related to their adverse effects. This review highlights the knowledge needed to provide appropriate clinical pharmacy services for patients supported by MCS devices. CONCLUSIONS: The HeartMate II clinical investigators called for the involvement of pharmacists in MCS patient assessment and optimization. Pharmacotherapeutic management of patients supported with MCS devices requires individualized care, with pharmacists as part of the team, based on the characteristics of each pump and recipient.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacotherapy associated with the provision of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to patients with end-stage heart failure and guidance regarding the selection, assessment, and optimization of drug therapy for this population. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1960 to July 2010 for articles published in English using the search terms mechanical circulatory support, ventricular assist system, ventricular assist device, left ventricular assist device, right ventricular assist device, biventricular assist device, total artificial heart, pulsatile, positive displacement, axial, centrifugal, hemostasis, bleeding, hemodynamic, blood pressure, thrombosis, antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulant, antiplatelet, right ventricular failure, ventricular arrhythmia, anemia, arteriovenous malformation, stroke, infection, and clinical pharmacist. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant original studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and reviews were assessed for inclusion. References from pertinent articles were examined for content not found during the initial search. DATA SYNTHESIS: MCS has advanced significantly since the first left ventricular assist device was implanted in 1966. Further advancements in MCS technology that occurred in the latter decade are changing the overall management of endstage heart failure care and cardiac transplantation. These pumps allow for improved bridge-to-transplant rates, enhanced survival, and quality of life. Pharmacotherapy associated with MCS devices may optimize the performance of the pumps and improve patient outcomes, as well as minimize morbidity related to their adverse effects. This review highlights the knowledge needed to provide appropriate clinical pharmacy services for patients supported by MCS devices. CONCLUSIONS: The HeartMate II clinical investigators called for the involvement of pharmacists in MCSpatient assessment and optimization. Pharmacotherapeutic management of patients supported with MCS devices requires individualized care, with pharmacists as part of the team, based on the characteristics of each pump and recipient.
Authors: Lorenzo Valerio; Jawaad Sheriff; Phat L Tran; William Brengle; Alberto Redaelli; Gianfranco B Fiore; Federico Pappalardo; Danny Bluestein; Marvin J Slepian Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: William J Weiss; Elizabeth L Carney; J Brian Clark; Rebecca Peterson; Timothy K Cooper; Thomas P Nifong; Christopher A Siedlecki; Dennis Hicks; Bradley Doxtater; Branka Lukic; Eric Yeager; John Reibson; Joshua Cysyk; Gerson Rosenberg; William S Pierce Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Lorenzo Valerio; Phat L Tran; Jawaad Sheriff; William Brengle; Ram Ghosh; Wei-Che Chiu; Alberto Redaelli; Gianfranco B Fiore; Federico Pappalardo; Danny Bluestein; Marvin J Slepian Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Elisabeth E Donahey; Derek M Polly; J David Vega; Marshall Lyon; Javed Butler; Duc Nguyen; Ann Pekarek; Kristin Wittersheim; Patrick Kilgo; Christopher A Paciullo Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Jennifer Sherwin; Elizabeth Thompson; Kevin D Hill; Kevin Watt; Andrew J Lodge; Daniel Gonzalez; Christoph P Hornik Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 1.093