BACKGROUND: While Parkinson disease (PD) is consistently associated with impaired olfaction, one study reported better olfaction among Parkin mutation carriers than noncarriers. Whether olfaction differs between Parkin mutation heterozygotes and carriers of 2 Parkin mutations (compound heterozygotes) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between Parkin genotype and olfaction in PD probands and their unaffected relatives. METHODS: We administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) to 44 probands in the Consortium on Risk for Early-Onset Parkinson Disease study with PD onset ≤50 years (10 Parkin mutation heterozygotes, 9 compound heterozygotes, 25 noncarriers) and 80 of their family members (18 heterozygotes, 2 compound heterozygotes, 60 noncarriers). In the probands, linear regression was used to assess the association between UPSIT score (outcome) and Parkin genotype (predictor), adjusting for covariates. Among family members without PD, we compared UPSIT performance in heterozygotes vs noncarriers using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for family membership, age, gender, and smoking. RESULTS: Among probands with PD, compound heterozygotes had higher UPSIT scores (31.9) than heterozygotes (20.1) or noncarriers (19.9) (p < 0.001). These differences persisted after adjustment for age, gender, disease duration, and smoking. Among relatives without PD, UPSIT performance was similar in heterozygotes (32.5) vs noncarriers (32.4), and better than in heterozygotes with PD (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Olfaction is significantly reduced among Parkin mutation heterozygotes with PD but not among their heterozygous relatives without PD. Compound heterozygotes with PD have olfaction within the normal range. Further research is required to assess whether these findings reflect different neuropathology in Parkin mutation heterozygotes and compound heterozygotes.
BACKGROUND: While Parkinson disease (PD) is consistently associated with impaired olfaction, one study reported better olfaction among Parkin mutation carriers than noncarriers. Whether olfaction differs between Parkin mutation heterozygotes and carriers of 2 Parkin mutations (compound heterozygotes) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between Parkin genotype and olfaction in PD probands and their unaffected relatives. METHODS: We administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) to 44 probands in the Consortium on Risk for Early-Onset Parkinson Disease study with PD onset ≤50 years (10 Parkin mutation heterozygotes, 9 compound heterozygotes, 25 noncarriers) and 80 of their family members (18 heterozygotes, 2 compound heterozygotes, 60 noncarriers). In the probands, linear regression was used to assess the association between UPSIT score (outcome) and Parkin genotype (predictor), adjusting for covariates. Among family members without PD, we compared UPSIT performance in heterozygotes vs noncarriers using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for family membership, age, gender, and smoking. RESULTS: Among probands with PD, compound heterozygotes had higher UPSIT scores (31.9) than heterozygotes (20.1) or noncarriers (19.9) (p < 0.001). These differences persisted after adjustment for age, gender, disease duration, and smoking. Among relatives without PD, UPSIT performance was similar in heterozygotes (32.5) vs noncarriers (32.4), and better than in heterozygotes with PD (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Olfaction is significantly reduced among Parkin mutation heterozygotes with PD but not among their heterozygous relatives without PD. Compound heterozygotes with PD have olfaction within the normal range. Further research is required to assess whether these findings reflect different neuropathology in Parkin mutation heterozygotes and compound heterozygotes.
Authors: R Hilker; C Klein; M Ghaemi; B Kis; T Strotmann; L J Ozelius; O Lenz; P Vieregge; K Herholz; W D Heiss; P P Pramstaller Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: C B Lücking; A Dürr; V Bonifati; J Vaughan; G De Michele; T Gasser; B S Harhangi; G Meco; P Denèfle; N W Wood; Y Agid; A Brice Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A T Portman; N Giladi; K L Leenders; P Maguire; L Veenma-van der Duin; J Swart; J Pruim; E S Simon; S Hassin-Baer; A D Korczyn Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-06-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Farrer; P Chan; R Chen; L Tan; S Lincoln; D Hernandez; L Forno; K Gwinn-Hardy; L Petrucelli; J Hussey; A Singleton; C Tanner; J Hardy; J W Langston Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: K Hedrich; K Marder; J Harris; M Kann; T Lynch; H Meija-Santana; P P Pramstaller; E Schwinger; S B Bressman; S Fahn; C Klein Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-04-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ebba Lohmann; Magali Periquet; Vincenzo Bonifati; Nick W Wood; Giuseppe De Michele; Anne-Marie Bonnet; Valérie Fraix; Emmanuel Broussolle; Martin W I M Horstink; Marie Vidailhet; Patrice Verpillat; Thomas Gasser; David Nicholl; Hélio Teive; Salmo Raskin; Olivier Rascol; Alain Destée; Merle Ruberg; Francesca Gasparini; Giuseppe Meco; Yves Agid; Alexandra Durr; Alexis Brice Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Madeleine E Sharp; Elise Caccappolo; Helen Mejia-Santana; Ming-X Tang; Llency Rosado; Martha Orbe Reilly; Diana Ruiz; Elan D Louis; Cynthia Comella; Martha Nance; Susan Bressman; William K Scott; Caroline Tanner; Cheryl Waters; Stanley Fahn; Lucien Cote; Blair Ford; Michael Rezak; Kevin Novak; Joseph H Friedman; Ronald Pfeiffer; Haydeh Payami; Eric Molho; Stuart A Factor; John Nutt; Carmen Serrano; Maritza Arroyo; Michael W Pauciulo; William C Nichols; Lorraine N Clark; Roy N Alcalay; Karen S Marder Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Anna De Rosa; Teresa Pellegrino; Sabina Pappatà; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Silvio Peluso; Francesco Saccà; Paolo Barone; Alberto Cuocolo; Giuseppe De Michele Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Roy N Alcalay; Elise Caccappolo; Helen Mejia-Santana; Ming Xin Tang; Llency Rosado; Martha Orbe Reilly; Diana Ruiz; Elan D Louis; Cynthia L Comella; Martha A Nance; Susan B Bressman; William K Scott; Caroline M Tanner; Susan F Mickel; Cheryl H Waters; Stanley Fahn; Lucien J Cote; Steven J Frucht; Blair Ford; Michael Rezak; Kevin E Novak; Joseph H Friedman; Ronald F Pfeiffer; Laura Marsh; Bradley Hiner; Haydeh Payami; Eric Molho; Stewart A Factor; John G Nutt; Carmen Serrano; Maritza Arroyo; Ruth Ottman; Michael W Pauciulo; William C Nichols; Lorraine N Clark; Karen S Marder Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Marina Picillo; Anna De Rosa; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Chiara Criscuolo; Marianna Amboni; Roberto Erro; Vincenzo Bonifati; Giuseppe De Michele; Paolo Barone Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2015-07-25
Authors: Madeleine E Sharp; Karen S Marder; Lucien Côté; Lorraine N Clark; William C Nichols; Jean-Paul Vonsattel; Roy N Alcalay Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 10.338