Literature DB >> 21205626

Analgesic efficacy and haemodynamic effects of nefopam in critically ill patients.

G Chanques1, M Sebbane, J M Constantin, N Ramillon, B Jung, M Cissé, J Y Lefrant, S Jaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain management is challenging in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The analgesic efficacy, tolerance, and haemodynamic effects of nefopam have never been described in critically ill patients.
METHODS: In consecutive medical-surgical ICU patients who received 20 mg of nefopam i.v. over 30 min, we measured pain, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), respiratory parameters, and adverse drug events at T0 (baseline), T30 (end-of-infusion), T60, and T90 min. Haemodynamic variables were assessed every 15 min from T0 to T60 and T90. Pain was evaluated by the behavioural pain scale (BPS, 3-12) or by the self-reported visual numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) according to communication capacity.
RESULTS: Data were analysed for 59 patients. As early as T30, median NRS and BPS decreased significantly from T0 to a minimum level at T60 for NRS [5 (4-7) vs 1 (1-3), P<0.001] and T90 for BPS [5 (5-6) vs 3 (3-4), P<0.001]. No significant changes were detected for RASS, ventilatory frequency, or oxygen saturation. Increased heart rate and decreased mean arterial pressure, defined as a change ≥15% from baseline, were found in 29% and 27% of patients, respectively. For the 18 patients monitored, cardiac output increased by 19 (7-29)% and systemic vascular resistance decreased by 20 (8-28)%, both maximally at T30. Heat sensation, nausea/vomiting, sweating, and mouth dryness were found, respectively, in 6%, 9%, 22%, and 38% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A single slow infusion of nefopam is effective in critically ill patients who have moderate pain. The risk of tachycardia and increased cardiac output and also hypotension and decreased systemic vascular resistance should be known to evaluate the benefit/risk ratio of its prescription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21205626     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  12 in total

1.  Slow injection of nefopam reduces pain intensity associated with intravenous injection: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Byung Gun Lim; Heezoo Kim; Myoung Hoon Kong; Mi Kyoung Lee; Il Ok Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of nefopam in elderly, with or without renal impairment, and its link to treatment response.

Authors:  Zoubir Djerada; Aurélie Fournet-Fayard; Claire Gozalo; Chantal Lelarge; Denis Lamiable; Hervé Millart; Jean-Marc Malinovsky
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The transition from acute to chronic pain: might intensive care unit patients be at risk?

Authors:  Maria Kyranou; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  The pain, agitation, and delirium practice guidelines for adult critically ill patients: a post-publication perspective.

Authors:  Yoanna Skrobik; Gerald Chanques
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Comparison of effect of electroacupuncture and nefopam for prevention of postanesthetic shivering in patients undergoing urologic operation under spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Hong; Su-Jin Kim; Min-Sub Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Effects of nefopam on catheter-related bladder discomfort in patients undergoing ureteroscopic litholapaxy.

Authors:  Yong Woo Cheon; Seon Hwan Kim; Jin Hyub Paek; Jin A Kim; Yong Kyung Lee; Jin Hye Min; Hyung Rae Cho
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 7.  Palliative care in the ICU: relief of pain, dyspnea, and thirst--a report from the IPAL-ICU Advisory Board.

Authors:  Kathleen Puntillo; Judith Eve Nelson; David Weissman; Randall Curtis; Stefanie Weiss; Jennifer Frontera; Michelle Gabriel; Ross Hays; Dana Lustbader; Anne Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Daniel Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee Boss; Karen Brasel; Margaret Campbell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Comparison of meperidine and nefopam for prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Yeon A Kim; Tae Dong Kweon; Myounghwa Kim; Hye In Lee; You Jin Lee; Ki-Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-03-19

9.  Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project).

Authors:  Audrey de Jong; Nicolas Molinari; Sylvie de Lattre; Claudine Gniadek; Julie Carr; Mathieu Conseil; Marie-Pierre Susbielles; Boris Jung; Samir Jaber; Gérald Chanques
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Effects of nefopam on emergence agitation after general anesthesia for nasal surgery: A prospective, randomized, and controlled trial.

Authors:  Young Seok Jee; Hwang-Ju You; Tae-Yun Sung; Choon-Kyu Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.