Literature DB >> 21204795

Personalized medicine - the promised land: are we there yet?

C Li1.   

Abstract

The delivery of personalized genomic medicine (refer Table 1 for a comparison of genomic vs genetic medicine and box 1 for glossary) hinges on obtaining personal genomic data through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or whole-genome sequencing. After the completion of the human genome project (see box 2 for human genome projects and its derivative projects) in 2003, there appeared to be a period of euphoric optimism that as soon as the cost of sequencing the whole human genome could be brought down to an affordable range, the promise of personalized medicine would become a reality. However, inasmuch as the miraculous technological advancements are making whole-genome data acquisition an inexpensive reality, we are also starting to appreciate that making sense of the enormous amount of genomic data is a far bigger hurdle. Issues, both scientific and ethico-legal, will have to be addressed as genomic data are been pushed for clinical and direct-to-consumer utilization. [Table: see text].
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21204795     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  10 in total

1.  Consensus: a framework for evaluation of uncertain gene variants in laboratory test reporting.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-16

Review 3.  Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.

Authors:  B Middleton; D F Sittig; A Wright
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

4.  Utility of gene-specific algorithms for predicting pathogenicity of uncertain gene variants.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  "Would you test your children without their consent?" and other sticky dilemmas in the field of cancer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle C Bonadies; Anne Moyer; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Whole brain approaches for identification of microstructural abnormalities in individual patients: comparison of techniques applied to mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Namhee Kim; Craig A Branch; Mimi Kim; Michael L Lipton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Multivariate characterization of white matter heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  D C Dean; N Lange; B G Travers; M B Prigge; N Matsunami; K A Kellett; A Freeman; K L Kane; N Adluru; D P M Tromp; D J Destiche; D Samsin; B A Zielinski; P T Fletcher; J S Anderson; A L Froehlich; M F Leppert; E D Bigler; J E Lainhart; A L Alexander
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  A Longitudinal Study of the Association between the LEPR Polymorphism and Treatment Response in Patients with Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Hui Hua Chang; Yuan-Shuo Hsueh; Yung Wen Cheng; Huai-Hsuan Tseng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 9.  Use of next generation sequencing technologies in research and beyond: are participants with mental health disorders fully protected?

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Ghislaine Mathieu; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Comparison of commercial genetic-testing services in Korea with 23andMe service.

Authors:  Sollip Kim; Ki-Won Eom; Chong-Rae Cho; Tae Hyun Um
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.