| Literature DB >> 21203518 |
Kyeong-Nam Yu1, Arash Minai-Tehrani, Seung-Hee Chang, Soon-Kyung Hwang, Seong-Ho Hong, Ji-Eun Kim, Ji-Young Shin, Sung-Jin Park, Ji-Hye Kim, Jung-Taek Kwon, Hu-Lin Jiang, Bitna Kang, Duyeol Kim, Chan-Hee Chae, Kee-Ho Lee, Tae-Jong Yoon, George R Beck, Myung-Haing Cho.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastasis to the lung may be the final step in the breast cancer-related morbidity. Conventional therapies such as chemotherapy and surgery are somewhat successful, however, metastasis-related breast cancer morbidity remains high. Thus, a novel approach to prevent breast tumor metastasis is needed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDING: Aerosol of lentivirus-based small hairpin osteopontin was delivered into mice with breast cancer twice a week for 1 or 2 months using a nose-only inhalation system. The effects of small hairpin osteopontin on breast cancer metastasis to the lung were evaluated using near infrared imaging as well as diverse molecular techniques. Aerosol-delivered small hairpin osteopontin significantly decreased the expression level of osteopontin and altered the expression of several important metastasis-related proteins in our murine breast cancer model. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Aerosol-delivered small hairpin osteopontin blocked breast cancer metastasis. Our results showed that noninvasive targeting of pulmonary osteopontin or other specific genes responsible for cancer metastasis could be used as an effective therapeutic regimen for the treatment of metastatic epithelial tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21203518 PMCID: PMC3008732 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Lentivirus-shOPN decreases metastasis to the lung.
(A) Gross morphological examination of the lung after aerosol delivery of shOPN for 1 or 2 months. White circles indicate neoplastic nodules observed in the lung. (B) Histopathological examination of lung after aerosol delivery of shOPN for 1 or 2 months. Magnification (×200) scale bar: 50 µm.
Summary of tumor incidence in mouse model of metastatic breast cancer.
| Group | Number of mouse | Tumor numbers/mouse | Adenocarcinomaincidence | Adenoma | ||||
| Total | >1.5 mm | <1.5 mm | ++ | + | ||||
| Control | 4 | 6.25±0.87 | 1.5±1.73 | 4.75±1.94 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1month | scrambled | 4 | 6±2.61 | 2±1.83 | 4±1.08 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| shOPN | 4 | 2.13±1.03 | N.D. | 2.13±1.03 | N.D. | 2 | ||
| 2months | scrambled | 4 | 9.25±0.87 | 2.5±1.29 | 6.75±0.87 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| shOPN | 4 | 2.38±0.63##
| N.D. | 2.38±0.63 | N.D. | 2 | ||
Difinition of abbreviations: shOPN = small hairpin Osteopontin. N.D. = Not Detected.
Breast cancer model mice were exposed to lentivirus-shOPN twice a week for 1 or 2 months. After 1 or 2 months, the mice were sacrificed, lungs were collected, and the lesions on the lung surfaces were counted. Incidence and tumor number of lung mass were compared. Data were expressed as means ± S.E.M.
: Number of tumors of smaller than 1.5 mm in diameter.
: Number of tumors of greater than 1.5 mm in diameter.
: Adenocarcinoma grade was mild.
: Adenocarcinoma grade was moderate.
: p<0.01 compared to scrambled group.
**: p<0.01 compared to control group.
Figure 2Effect of Aerosol-delivered shOPN on expression level of OPN.
(A) Western blot analysis of OPN. (B) Densitometric analysis of OPN. (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of OPN. Magnification: ×400. Scale bar: 20 µm. (D) Comparison of OPN labeling index. Each bar represents the mean± S.E.M (n = 3). *Statistically significant different (P<0.05) compared to control group. **Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to control group. #Statistically different (P<0.05) compared to scrambled control. ##Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to scrambled control.
Figure 3Western Blot Analysis of CD44v6, VEGF, MMP-9, and MMP-2.
(A) Expression of CD44v6, VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9 in the lung. (B) Bands-of-interest were further analyzed by densitometry. Each bar represents the mean± S.E.M (n = 3). *Statistically different (P<0.05) compared to control group. **Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to control group. #Statistically different (P<0.05) compared to scrambled control. ##Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to scrambled control.
Figure 4Effect of Aerosol-delivered shOPN on expression level of PCNA.
(A) Western blot of PCNA. (B) Densitometric analysis of PCNA. (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of PCNA. Magnification: ×400. Scale bar: 20 µm. (D) Comparison of PCNA labeling index. Each bar represents the mean± S.E.M (n = 3). *Statistically different (P<0.05) compared to control group. **Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to control group. #Statistically different (P<0.05) compared to scrambled control. ##Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to scrambled control.
Figure 5Wound Healing Assay.
(A) Cell migration was inhibited by lentivirus-shOPN. MDA-MB 231 cells were grown up to 90% confluence, a single wound was made in the center of the cell monolayer and cell debris was removed by washing. After 24 h of incubation, the wound closure areas were visualized under an inverted microscope with a magnification ×100, (B) and the migrated cells were counted. **Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to control group. ##Statistically different (P<0.01) compared to scrambled control.