Literature DB >> 21202704

4-[(1H-Benzotriazol-1-yl)meth-yl]benzo-nitrile.

Wen-Xiang Wang1, Hong Zhao.   

Abstract

In the mol-ecule of the title compound, C(14)H(10)N(4), which was prepared by reaction of benzotriazole with 4-(bromo-meth-yl)benzonitrile in alkaline solution, the dihedral angle between the benzotriazole and benzene ring systems is 69.03 (6)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21202704      PMCID: PMC2961422          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808010969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the application of benzotriazole compounds in industry, see: Pillard et al. (2001 ▶); Kopanska et al. (2004 ▶); Gruden et al. (2001 ▶). For the structure of a related compound, see: Selvanayagam et al. (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H10N4 M = 234.26 Monoclinic, a = 8.1912 (13) Å b = 19.0520 (9) Å c = 8.6610 (6) Å β = 118.0390 (10)° V = 1193.0 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.50 × 0.40 × 0.40 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.960, T max = 0.969 11866 measured reflections 2715 independent reflections 1903 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.047

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.067 wR(F 2) = 0.182 S = 1.09 2715 reflections 163 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.34 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808010969/rz2206sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808010969/rz2206Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H10N4F000 = 488
Mr = 234.26Dx = 1.304 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2264 reflections
a = 8.1912 (13) Åθ = 3.0–27.4º
b = 19.0520 (9) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 8.6610 (6) ÅT = 293 (2) K
β = 118.0390 (10)ºBlock, yellow
V = 1193.0 (2) Å30.50 × 0.40 × 0.40 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer2715 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1903 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.047
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5º
T = 293(2) Kθmin = 3.0º
CCD Profile fitting scansh = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −24→24
Tmin = 0.960, Tmax = 0.969l = −11→11
11866 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.067H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.182  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0763P)2 + 0.2728P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
2715 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
163 parametersΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.7006 (4)0.10232 (14)0.9067 (4)0.0662 (7)
H1A0.68910.14960.87690.079*
C20.8443 (4)0.07658 (15)1.0621 (4)0.0714 (7)
H2B0.93200.10811.13800.086*
C30.8630 (4)0.00549 (15)1.1096 (4)0.0706 (7)
C40.7387 (4)−0.04391 (14)1.0033 (4)0.0674 (7)
H4A0.7493−0.09111.03440.081*
C50.5915 (3)−0.01855 (12)0.8418 (3)0.0554 (6)
C60.5771 (3)0.05233 (12)0.8006 (3)0.0546 (6)
C70.3403 (4)0.11817 (13)0.5272 (3)0.0631 (6)
H7A0.27900.10330.40580.076*
H7B0.43720.15100.54200.076*
C80.2010 (3)0.15545 (12)0.5681 (3)0.0513 (5)
C90.2298 (3)0.22412 (12)0.6302 (3)0.0626 (6)
H9A0.33790.24740.65040.075*
C100.0989 (3)0.25833 (13)0.6624 (3)0.0616 (6)
H10A0.11820.30440.70260.074*
C11−0.0614 (3)0.22289 (11)0.6339 (3)0.0515 (5)
C12−0.0901 (3)0.15394 (12)0.5744 (3)0.0583 (6)
H12A−0.19670.13020.55660.070*
C130.0408 (3)0.12081 (12)0.5417 (3)0.0574 (6)
H13A0.02120.07470.50150.069*
C14−0.2037 (4)0.25735 (12)0.6617 (3)0.0621 (6)
N10.4254 (3)0.05596 (10)0.6402 (3)0.0574 (5)
N20.3499 (3)−0.00893 (11)0.5862 (3)0.0684 (6)
N30.4492 (3)−0.05515 (11)0.7082 (3)0.0688 (6)
N4−0.3207 (3)0.28251 (13)0.6795 (4)0.0841 (8)
H3B0.9617−0.00851.21510.101*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0730 (16)0.0558 (14)0.0776 (18)−0.0081 (12)0.0417 (14)−0.0063 (12)
C20.0659 (16)0.0753 (18)0.0646 (17)−0.0119 (13)0.0238 (13)−0.0063 (13)
C30.0653 (16)0.0776 (18)0.0631 (16)−0.0004 (13)0.0253 (13)−0.0002 (13)
C40.0726 (17)0.0598 (15)0.0774 (18)0.0070 (12)0.0417 (15)0.0072 (13)
C50.0539 (13)0.0533 (13)0.0677 (15)−0.0040 (10)0.0358 (12)−0.0103 (11)
C60.0604 (14)0.0511 (12)0.0641 (14)0.0022 (10)0.0390 (12)−0.0023 (10)
C70.0645 (15)0.0679 (15)0.0641 (15)0.0104 (12)0.0361 (12)0.0075 (12)
C80.0492 (12)0.0554 (13)0.0497 (12)0.0039 (9)0.0235 (10)0.0039 (10)
C90.0508 (13)0.0606 (15)0.0791 (17)−0.0085 (10)0.0327 (12)−0.0035 (12)
C100.0604 (14)0.0509 (13)0.0748 (16)−0.0079 (11)0.0328 (12)−0.0098 (11)
C110.0509 (12)0.0520 (12)0.0526 (13)0.0003 (9)0.0252 (10)−0.0016 (10)
C120.0527 (13)0.0531 (13)0.0713 (15)−0.0084 (10)0.0310 (12)−0.0083 (11)
C130.0583 (14)0.0478 (12)0.0672 (15)−0.0029 (10)0.0303 (12)−0.0084 (10)
C140.0659 (15)0.0530 (13)0.0762 (16)−0.0044 (11)0.0408 (13)−0.0065 (12)
N10.0533 (11)0.0651 (12)0.0564 (12)0.0047 (9)0.0279 (9)−0.0029 (9)
N20.0658 (13)0.0603 (13)0.0782 (15)0.0012 (10)0.0330 (11)−0.0047 (11)
N30.0681 (13)0.0547 (12)0.0851 (15)−0.0019 (10)0.0373 (12)−0.0069 (11)
N40.0786 (16)0.0733 (15)0.119 (2)−0.0010 (12)0.0622 (16)−0.0153 (14)
C1—C61.379 (3)C7—H7B0.9700
C1—C21.396 (4)C8—C131.388 (3)
C1—H1A0.9301C8—C91.392 (3)
C2—C31.403 (4)C9—C101.391 (3)
C2—H2B0.9300C9—H9A0.9299
C3—C41.374 (4)C10—C111.391 (3)
C3—H3B0.9299C10—H10A0.9300
C4—C51.435 (4)C11—C121.390 (3)
C4—H4A0.9300C11—C141.453 (3)
C5—N31.384 (3)C12—C131.383 (3)
C5—C61.387 (3)C12—H12A0.9299
C6—N11.362 (3)C13—H13A0.9300
C7—N11.486 (3)C14—N41.145 (3)
C7—C81.521 (3)N1—N21.363 (3)
C7—H7A0.9700N2—N31.321 (3)
C6—C1—C2114.9 (2)C13—C8—C9119.1 (2)
C6—C1—H1A122.5C13—C8—C7119.6 (2)
C2—C1—H1A122.5C9—C8—C7121.3 (2)
C1—C2—C3123.2 (2)C10—C9—C8120.7 (2)
C1—C2—H2B118.4C10—C9—H9A119.6
C3—C2—H2B118.4C8—C9—H9A119.6
C4—C3—C2121.4 (2)C11—C10—C9119.3 (2)
C4—C3—H3B119.4C11—C10—H10A120.4
C2—C3—H3B119.3C9—C10—H10A120.4
C3—C4—C5116.2 (2)C12—C11—C10120.4 (2)
C3—C4—H4A121.9C12—C11—C14118.6 (2)
C5—C4—H4A121.9C10—C11—C14121.0 (2)
N3—C5—C6109.8 (2)C13—C12—C11119.7 (2)
N3—C5—C4129.6 (2)C13—C12—H12A120.2
C6—C5—C4120.6 (2)C11—C12—H12A120.2
N1—C6—C1132.6 (2)C12—C13—C8120.8 (2)
N1—C6—C5103.8 (2)C12—C13—H13A119.6
C1—C6—C5123.6 (2)C8—C13—H13A119.6
N1—C7—C8112.97 (18)N4—C14—C11177.3 (3)
N1—C7—H7A109.0C6—N1—N2110.69 (19)
C8—C7—H7A109.0C6—N1—C7129.3 (2)
N1—C7—H7B109.0N2—N1—C7120.0 (2)
C8—C7—H7B109.0N3—N2—N1108.7 (2)
H7A—C7—H7B107.8N2—N3—C5107.0 (2)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Fate and toxicity of aircraft deicing fluid additives through anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  C L Gruden; S M Dow; M T Hernandez
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.946

3.  Toxicity of benzotriazole and benzotriazole derivatives to three aquatic species.

Authors:  D A Pillard; J S Cornell; D L Dufresne; M T Hernandez
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Synthesis and activity of 1H-benzimidazole and 1H-benzotriazole derivatives as inhibitors of Acanthamoeba castellanii.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kopańska; Andzelika Najda; Justyna Zebrowska; Lidia Chomicz; Janusz Piekarczyk; Przemysław Myjak; Maria Bretner
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.641

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.