Literature DB >> 21202311

Methyl 4-methyl-benzoate.

Aamer Saeed, Hummera Rafique, Ulrich Flörke.   

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, C(9)H(10)O(2), is related to that of 4-methyl-phenyl 4-methyl-benzoate and ethyl-ene di-4-methyl-benzoate showing similar bond parameters. The mol-ecule is planar, the dihedral angle between the aromatic ring and the -COOMe group being 0.95 (6)°. The cystal structure exhibits inter-molecular C-H⋯O contacts that link mol-ecules into infinite chains extended in the [001] direction.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21202311      PMCID: PMC2961182          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808008738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Deguire & Brisse (1988 ▶); Gowda et al. (2007 ▶; Gray & Whalley (1971 ▶); Harris & Mantle (2001 ▶); Saeed & Rama (1994 ▶); Simpson (1978 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H10O2 M = 150.17 Monoclinic, a = 5.9134 (11) Å b = 7.6048 (14) Å c = 17.484 (3) Å β = 97.783 (4)° V = 779.0 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 120 (2) K 0.45 × 0.43 × 0.39 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.961, T max = 0.967 6617 measured reflections 1855 independent reflections 1482 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.038

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042 wR(F 2) = 0.124 S = 1.06 1855 reflections 102 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808008738/sg2231sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808008738/sg2231Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H10O2F000 = 320
Mr = 150.17Dx = 1.280 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 806 reflections
a = 5.9134 (11) Åθ = 2.4–27.8º
b = 7.6048 (14) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 17.484 (3) ÅT = 120 (2) K
β = 97.783 (4)ºBlock, colourless
V = 779.0 (2) Å30.45 × 0.43 × 0.39 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer1855 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube1482 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.039
T = 120(2) Kθmax = 27.9º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.4º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.961, Tmax = 0.967k = −10→9
6617 measured reflectionsl = −23→23
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.124  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0752P)2 + 0.0208P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1855 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
102 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.39091 (14)0.28701 (11)0.44793 (5)0.0280 (2)
O20.68910 (15)0.15425 (13)0.51751 (5)0.0325 (3)
C10.2956 (2)0.31740 (17)0.51874 (7)0.0320 (3)
H1A0.27930.20500.54480.048*
H1B0.14560.37320.50680.048*
H1C0.39740.39460.55260.048*
C20.59091 (19)0.20144 (15)0.45593 (6)0.0234 (3)
C30.67753 (18)0.17434 (15)0.38071 (6)0.0223 (3)
C40.55841 (19)0.23124 (15)0.31083 (7)0.0247 (3)
H4A0.41540.28880.30980.030*
C50.6496 (2)0.20350 (15)0.24261 (7)0.0262 (3)
H5A0.56750.24260.19520.031*
C60.8588 (2)0.11953 (15)0.24239 (7)0.0244 (3)
C70.97615 (19)0.06389 (15)0.31291 (7)0.0253 (3)
H7A1.11950.00680.31400.030*
C80.88716 (19)0.09050 (15)0.38126 (7)0.0242 (3)
H8A0.96930.05150.42870.029*
C90.9593 (2)0.08897 (17)0.16858 (7)0.0312 (3)
H9A1.12130.12130.17640.047*
H9B0.87820.16130.12730.047*
H9C0.9438−0.03550.15420.047*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0268 (5)0.0322 (5)0.0260 (4)0.0042 (3)0.0071 (3)0.0018 (3)
O20.0343 (5)0.0389 (5)0.0234 (5)0.0042 (4)0.0004 (4)0.0016 (3)
C10.0340 (7)0.0342 (7)0.0299 (7)0.0024 (5)0.0121 (5)−0.0009 (5)
C20.0249 (6)0.0201 (6)0.0248 (6)−0.0033 (4)0.0022 (5)0.0003 (4)
C30.0236 (6)0.0203 (6)0.0232 (6)−0.0031 (4)0.0031 (4)0.0006 (4)
C40.0214 (5)0.0252 (6)0.0271 (6)0.0008 (4)0.0022 (4)0.0024 (4)
C50.0271 (6)0.0281 (6)0.0222 (6)−0.0019 (5)−0.0006 (5)0.0029 (4)
C60.0275 (6)0.0210 (6)0.0251 (6)−0.0058 (4)0.0049 (4)−0.0010 (4)
C70.0231 (6)0.0215 (6)0.0316 (6)0.0008 (4)0.0042 (5)0.0002 (4)
C80.0245 (6)0.0221 (6)0.0251 (6)−0.0017 (4)0.0000 (4)0.0032 (4)
C90.0355 (7)0.0320 (7)0.0271 (6)−0.0005 (5)0.0079 (5)−0.0018 (5)
O1—C21.3405 (14)C5—C61.3927 (17)
O1—C11.4468 (14)C5—H5A0.9500
O2—C21.2065 (14)C6—C71.3962 (17)
C1—H1A0.9800C6—C91.5101 (16)
C1—H1B0.9800C7—C81.3843 (16)
C1—H1C0.9800C7—H7A0.9500
C2—C31.4890 (16)C8—H8A0.9500
C3—C81.3929 (16)C9—H9A0.9800
C3—C41.3940 (16)C9—H9B0.9800
C4—C51.3899 (16)C9—H9C0.9800
C4—H4A0.9500
C2—O1—C1115.38 (9)C4—C5—H5A119.3
O1—C1—H1A109.5C6—C5—H5A119.3
O1—C1—H1B109.5C5—C6—C7118.16 (10)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C5—C6—C9121.71 (11)
O1—C1—H1C109.5C7—C6—C9120.13 (11)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C8—C7—C6121.10 (10)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C8—C7—H7A119.5
O2—C2—O1123.28 (10)C6—C7—H7A119.5
O2—C2—C3124.43 (11)C7—C8—C3120.20 (10)
O1—C2—C3112.28 (9)C7—C8—H8A119.9
C8—C3—C4119.46 (10)C3—C8—H8A119.9
C8—C3—C2118.00 (10)C6—C9—H9A109.5
C4—C3—C2122.54 (10)C6—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—C3119.76 (11)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—H4A120.1C6—C9—H9C109.5
C3—C4—H4A120.1H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C5—C6121.33 (10)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C1—O1—C2—O2−1.07 (16)C3—C4—C5—C60.00 (17)
C1—O1—C2—C3179.72 (9)C4—C5—C6—C7−0.20 (17)
O2—C2—C3—C8−0.70 (18)C4—C5—C6—C9−179.94 (10)
O1—C2—C3—C8178.50 (10)C5—C6—C7—C80.28 (17)
O2—C2—C3—C4−179.94 (11)C9—C6—C7—C8−179.98 (10)
O1—C2—C3—C4−0.74 (16)C6—C7—C8—C3−0.16 (17)
C8—C3—C4—C50.12 (17)C4—C3—C8—C7−0.05 (17)
C2—C3—C4—C5179.36 (10)C2—C3—C8—C7−179.32 (10)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C9—H9B···O2i0.982.513.4930 (16)177
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C9—H9B⋯O2i0.982.513.4930 (16)177

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  The chemistry of fungi. 63. Rubrorotiorin, a metabolite of Penicillium hirayamae Udagawa.

Authors:  R W Gray; W B Whalley
Journal:  J Chem Soc Perkin 1       Date:  1971

3.  Biosynthesis of ochratoxins by Aspergillus ochraceus.

Authors:  J P Harris; P G Mantle
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.072

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Four Polymorphs of Methyl Paraben: Structural Relationships and Relative Energy Differences.

Authors:  Thomas Gelbrich; Doris E Braun; Arkady Ellern; Ulrich J Griesser
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.