Literature DB >> 21201784

4,4'-Dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridinium dichloride.

Urs David Eckensberger1, Hans-Wolfram Lerner, Michael Bolte.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(12)H(14)N(2) (2+)·2Cl(-), the n class="Chemical">4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridinium cation is essentially planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms = 0.004 Å) and is located on a crystallographic inversion centre. The cations and chloride anions lie in planes parallel to (111) and are connected by N-H⋯Cl and C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201784      PMCID: PMC2960639          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Eckensberger (2006 ▶); Scheibitz et al. (2005 ▶). For structures containing the 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridinium cation, see: Linden et al. (1999 ▶); Willett et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H14N2 2+·2Cl− M = 257.15 Triclinic, a = 5.1999 (10) Å b = 7.2705 (13) Å c = 8.4785 (15) Å α = 93.877 (15)° β = 102.349 (15)° γ = 97.759 (15)° V = 308.71 (10) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.50 mm−1 T = 173 (2) K 0.21 × 0.21 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Stoe IPDSII two-circle diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 2003 ▶; Blessing, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.902, T max = 0.933 3382 measured reflections 1147 independent reflections 926 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.058

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.079 S = 0.97 1147 reflections 78 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026615/bi2297sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808026615/bi2297Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H14N22+·2(Cl)Z = 1
Mr = 257.15F(000) = 134
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.383 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.1999 (10) ÅCell parameters from 3157 reflections
b = 7.2705 (13) Åθ = 3.6–25.8°
c = 8.4785 (15) ŵ = 0.50 mm1
α = 93.877 (15)°T = 173 K
β = 102.349 (15)°Block, colourless
γ = 97.759 (15)°0.21 × 0.21 × 0.14 mm
V = 308.71 (10) Å3
Stoe IPDSII two-circle diffractometer1147 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube926 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.058
ω scansθmax = 25.6°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 2003; Blessing, 1995)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.902, Tmax = 0.933k = −8→8
3382 measured reflectionsl = −10→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.079H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.97w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0407P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1147 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
78 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.97517 (12)0.22553 (7)0.26756 (7)0.02679 (18)
N10.6763 (4)0.3002 (2)0.5264 (2)0.0219 (4)
H10.749 (6)0.296 (4)0.444 (4)0.047 (8)*
C10.5194 (4)0.4274 (2)0.5570 (2)0.0195 (4)
C20.7255 (5)0.1636 (3)0.6223 (3)0.0254 (5)
H20.83620.07740.59670.031*
C30.6195 (5)0.1455 (3)0.7564 (3)0.0273 (5)
H30.65680.04830.82320.033*
C40.4553 (4)0.2725 (3)0.7936 (3)0.0223 (5)
C50.4078 (4)0.4121 (3)0.6904 (2)0.0210 (5)
H50.29570.49880.71250.025*
C60.3345 (5)0.2555 (3)0.9383 (3)0.0287 (5)
H6A0.23370.35850.94880.043*
H6B0.47610.26051.03620.043*
H6C0.21470.13650.92440.043*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0285 (3)0.0269 (3)0.0288 (3)0.00927 (19)0.0113 (2)0.00399 (18)
N10.0236 (10)0.0228 (8)0.0223 (10)0.0070 (7)0.0082 (8)0.0064 (7)
C10.0204 (11)0.0195 (9)0.0181 (10)0.0029 (8)0.0031 (8)0.0028 (8)
C20.0262 (12)0.0238 (9)0.0293 (12)0.0086 (8)0.0081 (10)0.0084 (8)
C30.0284 (13)0.0244 (10)0.0295 (12)0.0066 (9)0.0032 (10)0.0110 (9)
C40.0231 (11)0.0217 (9)0.0204 (10)−0.0012 (8)0.0035 (9)0.0039 (8)
C50.0243 (12)0.0196 (9)0.0200 (10)0.0061 (8)0.0043 (9)0.0049 (8)
C60.0350 (14)0.0301 (11)0.0218 (11)0.0040 (10)0.0076 (10)0.0075 (9)
N1—C21.342 (3)C3—H30.950
N1—C11.360 (2)C4—C51.397 (3)
N1—H10.86 (3)C4—C61.498 (3)
C1—C51.382 (3)C5—H50.950
C1—C1i1.484 (4)C6—H6A0.980
C2—C31.372 (3)C6—H6B0.980
C2—H20.950C6—H6C0.980
C3—C41.404 (3)
C2—N1—C1121.9 (2)C5—C4—C3117.6 (2)
C2—N1—H1113.5 (19)C5—C4—C6121.92 (17)
C1—N1—H1124.6 (19)C3—C4—C6120.46 (19)
N1—C1—C5118.08 (18)C1—C5—C4121.78 (17)
N1—C1—C1i117.0 (2)C1—C5—H5119.1
C5—C1—C1i124.9 (2)C4—C5—H5119.1
N1—C2—C3121.46 (17)C4—C6—H6A109.5
N1—C2—H2119.3C4—C6—H6B109.5
C3—C2—H2119.3H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C2—C3—C4119.17 (19)C4—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C3—H3120.4H6A—C6—H6C109.5
C4—C3—H3120.4H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C2—N1—C1—C5−0.5 (3)C2—C3—C4—C6179.4 (2)
C2—N1—C1—C1i179.7 (2)N1—C1—C5—C40.9 (3)
C1—N1—C2—C30.0 (3)C1i—C1—C5—C4−179.3 (2)
N1—C2—C3—C40.2 (3)C3—C4—C5—C1−0.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C50.1 (3)C6—C4—C5—C1−180.0 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···Cl10.86 (3)2.17 (3)3.009 (2)165 (3)
C2—H2···Cl1ii0.952.753.496 (2)136
C5—H5···Cl1i0.952.623.554 (2)169
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯Cl10.86 (3)2.17 (3)3.009 (2)165 (3)
C2—H2⋯Cl1i0.952.753.496 (2)136
C5—H5⋯Cl1ii0.952.623.554 (2)169

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy.

Authors:  R H Blessing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Crystal chemistry of the 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'bipyridine/copper bromide system.

Authors:  R D Willett; G Pon; C Nagy
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-08-13       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Electronic interactions in oligoferrocenes with cationic, neutral and anionic four-coordinate boron bridges.

Authors:  Matthias Scheibitz; Julia B Heilmann; Rainer F Winter; Michael Bolte; Jan W Bats; Matthias Wagner
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.390

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Redetermination of 2,2'-bipyridine-1,1'-diium dibromide.

Authors:  Basem F Ali; Rawhi Al-Far; Salim F Haddad
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-09-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.