Literature DB >> 21201729

Bis(1,2,3,4-tetra-hydro-quinolin-6-yl)methane.

Li Shen1, Qi Liu, Hai-Jun Shen.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(19)H(22)N(2), contains one half-mol-ecule. The 1,2,3,4-tetra-hydro-quinoline units are linked by a methyl-ene bridge, which lies on a twofold rotation axis. The non-aromatic ring adopts a flattened-boat conformation. The dihedral angle between the two symmetry-related benzene rings is 64.03 (7)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201729      PMCID: PMC2960691          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808025464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Xiao et al. (2008a ▶,b ▶,c ▶); Xiao et al. (2007a ▶,b ▶); Xue et al. (2007 ▶). For ring conformation puckering parameters, see: Cremer & Pople (1975 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C19H22N2 M = 278.39 Orthorhombic, a = 17.515 (3) Å b = 29.660 (4) Å c = 5.7678 (8) Å V = 2996.2 (8) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.07 mm−1 T = 292 (2) K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.979, T max = 0.986 4545 measured reflections 814 independent reflections 773 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.073

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048 wR(F 2) = 0.138 S = 1.07 814 reflections 100 parameters 2 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808025464/hk2506sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536808025464/hk2506Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C19H22N2F000 = 1200
Mr = 278.39Dx = 1.234 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: F 2 -2dCell parameters from 1297 reflections
a = 17.515 (3) Åθ = 2.9–25.2º
b = 29.660 (4) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
c = 5.7678 (8) ÅT = 292 (2) K
V = 2996.2 (8) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 80.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer814 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube773 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.073
T = 292(2) Kθmax = 26.0º
ω/2θ scansθmin = 2.7º
Absorption correction: ψ scan(North et al., 1968)h = −21→21
Tmin = 0.979, Tmax = 0.986k = −36→32
4545 measured reflectionsl = −7→6
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.138  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0996P)2 + 0.9957P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
814 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
2 restraintsExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.26094 (12)0.44383 (8)1.0848 (5)0.0605 (7)
H11A0.27000.45661.21590.073*
C10.00000.50000.5624 (6)0.0519 (9)
H10.0128 (16)0.5254 (7)0.464 (5)0.067 (10)*
C20.31123 (16)0.40914 (9)1.0048 (7)0.0637 (9)
H2A0.33600.39511.13680.076*
H2B0.35050.42240.90800.076*
C30.27005 (17)0.37452 (10)0.8715 (8)0.0662 (9)
H3A0.23570.35840.97400.079*
H3B0.30640.35300.80940.079*
C40.22470 (16)0.39493 (9)0.6743 (6)0.0579 (8)
H4A0.25950.40450.55300.070*
H4B0.19110.37220.60970.070*
C50.11375 (13)0.44942 (7)0.6314 (5)0.0415 (6)
H50.10040.43450.49540.050*
C60.06877 (12)0.48523 (8)0.7038 (5)0.0407 (6)
C70.09023 (12)0.50718 (8)0.9058 (5)0.0434 (6)
H70.06150.53150.95810.052*
C80.15365 (13)0.49360 (8)1.0313 (5)0.0435 (6)
H80.16670.50881.16670.052*
C90.19817 (12)0.45735 (7)0.9568 (5)0.0384 (5)
C100.17797 (12)0.43464 (7)0.7524 (5)0.0390 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0578 (13)0.0610 (13)0.0628 (17)0.0115 (10)−0.0273 (12)−0.0153 (13)
C10.0451 (19)0.068 (2)0.042 (2)0.0156 (17)0.0000.000
C20.0537 (15)0.0635 (16)0.074 (2)0.0170 (11)−0.0201 (16)0.0025 (16)
C30.0623 (16)0.0582 (15)0.078 (2)0.0198 (12)−0.0097 (17)−0.0042 (16)
C40.0622 (16)0.0558 (14)0.0558 (18)0.0202 (12)−0.0111 (15)−0.0126 (14)
C50.0420 (12)0.0442 (11)0.0384 (13)0.0016 (9)−0.0014 (11)−0.0069 (10)
C60.0324 (10)0.0460 (10)0.0437 (13)0.0024 (8)0.0016 (10)0.0000 (11)
C70.0383 (11)0.0416 (11)0.0504 (15)0.0045 (9)0.0061 (10)−0.0052 (11)
C80.0440 (12)0.0432 (11)0.0433 (14)−0.0040 (9)−0.0018 (11)−0.0113 (11)
C90.0345 (11)0.0392 (10)0.0416 (13)−0.0032 (8)−0.0034 (10)0.0013 (10)
C100.0398 (11)0.0375 (10)0.0398 (12)0.0008 (8)−0.0007 (10)−0.0036 (11)
N1—C21.431 (3)C4—H4B0.9700
N1—H11A0.8600C5—C61.387 (3)
C1—C61.519 (3)C5—C101.394 (3)
C1—C6i1.519 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—H10.97 (2)C7—C61.386 (4)
C2—C31.472 (4)C7—H70.9300
C2—H2A0.9700C8—C71.386 (3)
C2—H2B0.9700C8—H80.9300
C3—H3A0.9700C9—N11.384 (3)
C3—H3B0.9700C9—C81.396 (3)
C4—C31.514 (4)C9—C101.403 (4)
C4—H4A0.9700C10—C41.503 (3)
C9—N1—C2121.7 (3)C10—C4—H4B109.2
C9—N1—H11A119.2C3—C4—H4B109.2
C2—N1—H11A119.2H4A—C4—H4B107.9
C6—C1—C6i115.1 (3)C6—C5—C10123.3 (2)
C6—C1—H1110.8 (18)C6—C5—H5118.4
C6i—C1—H1105.9 (19)C10—C5—H5118.4
N1—C2—C3111.6 (2)C7—C6—C5117.3 (2)
N1—C2—H2A109.3C7—C6—C1122.0 (2)
C3—C2—H2A109.3C5—C6—C1120.6 (2)
N1—C2—H2B109.3C8—C7—C6121.3 (2)
C3—C2—H2B109.3C8—C7—H7119.3
H2A—C2—H2B108.0C6—C7—H7119.3
C2—C3—C4111.8 (2)C7—C8—C9120.7 (2)
C2—C3—H3A109.3C7—C8—H8119.6
C4—C3—H3A109.3C9—C8—H8119.6
C2—C3—H3B109.3N1—C9—C8120.2 (2)
C4—C3—H3B109.3N1—C9—C10120.6 (2)
H3A—C3—H3B107.9C8—C9—C10119.2 (2)
C10—C4—C3112.0 (2)C5—C10—C9118.2 (2)
C10—C4—H4A109.2C5—C10—C4122.4 (2)
C3—C4—H4A109.2C9—C10—C4119.4 (2)
C9—N1—C2—C3−33.5 (4)C9—C8—C7—C60.3 (4)
C6i—C1—C6—C7−39.05 (19)C8—C9—N1—C2−175.1 (2)
C6i—C1—C6—C5142.3 (3)C10—C9—N1—C25.6 (4)
N1—C2—C3—C454.2 (4)N1—C9—C8—C7−179.4 (2)
C10—C4—C3—C2−48.1 (4)C10—C9—C8—C70.0 (4)
C10—C5—C6—C70.6 (4)N1—C9—C10—C5179.4 (2)
C10—C5—C6—C1179.3 (2)C8—C9—C10—C50.0 (3)
C6—C5—C10—C9−0.3 (4)N1—C9—C10—C40.7 (4)
C6—C5—C10—C4178.3 (2)C8—C9—C10—C4−178.6 (2)
C8—C7—C6—C5−0.6 (4)C5—C10—C4—C3−157.7 (2)
C8—C7—C6—C1−179.2 (2)C9—C10—C4—C320.9 (4)
  4 in total

1.  Polyphenols based on isoflavones as inhibitors of Helicobacter pylori urease.

Authors:  Zhu-Ping Xiao; Da-Hua Shi; Huan-Qiu Li; Li-Na Zhang; Chen Xu; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis, antiproliferative activity, and structure-activity relationships of 3-aryl-1H-quinolin-4-ones.

Authors:  Zhu-Ping Xiao; Huan-Qiu Li; Lei Shi; Peng-Cheng Lv; Zhong-Cheng Song; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Synthesis, structure, and structure-activity relationship analysis of enamines as potential antibacterials.

Authors:  Zhu-Ping Xiao; Jia-Yu Xue; Shu-Hua Tan; Huan-Qiu Li; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.641

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.