Literature DB >> 21201526

3,3'-(Ethane-1,2-di-yl)bis-(2-thioxo-1,3-oxazolidin-4-one).

Chunhua Ge1, Ya'nan Guo, Xiangdong Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, Qitao Liu.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(8)H(8)N(2)O(4)S(2), contains one half of a centrosymmetric mol-ecule. A short C⋯O distance of 3.012 (4) Å between the carbonyl groups of neighbouring mol-ecules indicates the presence of dipole-dipole inter-actions. The crystal packing exhibits also weak inter-molecular O⋯S [3.239 (3) Å] and C-H⋯O inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21201526      PMCID: PMC2960409          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807057157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Gupta et al. (1981 ▶); Cutshall et al. (2005 ▶). For details of the synthesis, see: Doğan et al. (1992 ▶);

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H8N2O4S2 M = 260.28 Monoclinic, a = 6.2845 (12) Å b = 12.3252 (19) Å c = 7.080 (2) Å β = 105.22 (2)° V = 529.2 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.50 mm−1 T = 293 (2) K 0.20 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.908, T max = 0.955 1390 measured reflections 1012 independent reflections 761 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043 wR(F 2) = 0.127 S = 1.02 1012 reflections 73 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807057157/cv2350sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807057157/cv2350Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8N2O4S2F000 = 268
Mr = 260.28Dx = 1.634 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 554 reflections
a = 6.2845 (12) Åθ = 2.7–22.1º
b = 12.3252 (19) ŵ = 0.50 mm1
c = 7.080 (2) ÅT = 293 (2) K
β = 105.22 (2)ºBlock, colourless
V = 529.2 (2) Å30.20 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1012 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube761 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.028
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 26.0º
phi and ω scansθmin = 3.3º
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.908, Tmax = 0.955k = −15→1
1390 measured reflectionsl = −8→1
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.127  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0798P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.02(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1012 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
73 parametersΔρmin = −0.31 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.33868 (11)0.36411 (6)0.00385 (12)0.0506 (3)
O10.7149 (3)0.33522 (16)0.0792 (3)0.0486 (6)
C20.5626 (4)0.36727 (18)0.1543 (4)0.0373 (6)
N10.6306 (3)0.40084 (16)0.3674 (3)0.0350 (5)
C10.5096 (4)0.4388 (2)0.5081 (4)0.0389 (6)
H1A0.58840.41820.64010.047*
H1B0.36410.40630.47810.047*
O20.9269 (3)0.40856 (17)0.6269 (4)0.0600 (7)
C40.8323 (4)0.3902 (2)0.4422 (5)0.0442 (7)
C30.8954 (4)0.3505 (3)0.2477 (6)0.0605 (9)
H3A0.99500.40340.21590.073*
H3B0.97520.28260.27640.073*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0373 (4)0.0552 (5)0.0535 (5)−0.0042 (3)0.0018 (3)−0.0021 (3)
O10.0338 (10)0.0488 (11)0.0634 (13)0.0019 (8)0.0132 (9)−0.0174 (10)
C20.0359 (13)0.0282 (12)0.0484 (16)−0.0001 (10)0.0118 (12)0.0005 (11)
N10.0300 (10)0.0300 (10)0.0440 (14)0.0011 (8)0.0077 (9)−0.0010 (9)
C10.0397 (13)0.0354 (13)0.0432 (15)0.0007 (11)0.0137 (11)−0.0002 (12)
O20.0412 (11)0.0528 (12)0.0730 (16)−0.0003 (9)−0.0083 (10)−0.0046 (11)
C40.0337 (13)0.0307 (13)0.0613 (19)0.0023 (10)0.0000 (13)−0.0036 (12)
C30.0315 (14)0.0564 (18)0.090 (3)0.0008 (12)0.0094 (15)−0.0195 (18)
S1—C21.526 (3)C1—H1A0.9700
O1—C21.274 (3)C1—H1B0.9700
O1—C31.427 (4)O2—C41.307 (4)
C2—N11.514 (4)C4—C31.606 (5)
N1—C41.246 (3)C3—H3A0.9700
N1—C11.479 (3)C3—H3B0.9700
C1—C1i1.514 (5)
C2—O1—C397.4 (2)C1i—C1—H1B110.1
O1—C2—N1117.0 (2)H1A—C1—H1B108.4
O1—C2—S1110.9 (2)N1—C4—O2123.5 (3)
N1—C2—S1132.0 (2)N1—C4—C396.9 (3)
C4—N1—C1113.1 (2)O2—C4—C3139.6 (3)
C4—N1—C2112.6 (2)O1—C3—C4115.9 (2)
C1—N1—C2134.2 (2)O1—C3—H3A108.3
N1—C1—C1i108.0 (3)C4—C3—H3A108.3
N1—C1—H1A110.1O1—C3—H3B108.3
C1i—C1—H1A110.1C4—C3—H3B108.3
N1—C1—H1B110.1H3A—C3—H3B107.4
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3A···O2ii0.972.563.215 (4)125
C3—H3B···O2iii0.972.573.325 (4)135
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C3—H3A⋯O2i0.972.563.215 (4)125
C3—H3B⋯O2ii0.972.573.325 (4)135

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  Rhodanine derivatives as inhibitors of JSP-1.

Authors:  Neil S Cutshall; Christine O'Day; Marina Prezhdo
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Improvements in optical methods for measuring rapid changes in membrane potential.

Authors:  R K Gupta; B M Salzberg; A Grinvald; L B Cohen; K Kamino; S Lesher; M B Boyle; A S Waggoner; C H Wang
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 1.843

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.