Literature DB >> 21200676

7-Acetyl-amino-2,4-dimethyl-1,8-naphthyridine.

De-Hui Wang, Yao-Ming Yu, Jian-Hua Chen, Wen-Fu Fu.   

Abstract

The air-stable title compound, C(12)H(13)N(3)O, which is of inter-est due to its anti-bacterial properties, is an almost planar mol-ecule in which the ten atoms forming the 1,8-naphthyridine ring have an r.m.s. deviation of 0.03 Å from the least-squares plane calculated using the ten atoms. The plane of the acetyl-amino group is slightly inclined [11.7 (2)°] to the plane of the 1,8-naphthyridine ring.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21200676      PMCID: PMC2915183          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807042948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature, see: Catalano et al. (2000 ▶); Chen et al. (2001 ▶); Ferrarini et al. (1997 ▶, 2000 ▶); He & Lippard (2001 ▶); Henry & Hammond (1977 ▶); Mogilaiah et al. (2001 ▶); Nakatani et al. (2000 ▶); Roma et al. (2000 ▶); Saito et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H13N3O M = 215.25 Monoclinic, a = 7.970 (8) Å b = 7.309 (7) Å c = 19.071 (18) Å β = 91.883 (14)° V = 1110.4 (18) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 298 (2) K 0.52 × 0.36 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

SMART 1K CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.970, T max = 0.980 5375 measured reflections 1959 independent reflections 1169 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.036

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048 wR(F 2) = 0.153 S = 1.02 1959 reflections 145 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Bergerhoff, 1996 ▶) and XP (Bruker, 2000 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2000 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807042948/er2027sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536807042948/er2027Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H13N3OF000 = 456.0
Mr = 215.25Dx = 1.288 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1274 reflections
a = 7.970 (8) Åθ = 2.7–25.2º
b = 7.309 (7) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 19.071 (18) ÅT = 298 (2) K
β = 91.883 (14)ºBlock, pale yellow
V = 1110.4 (18) Å30.52 × 0.36 × 0.24 mm
Z = 4
SMART 1K CCD diffractometer1959 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1169 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.036
Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0º
T = 298(2) Kθmin = 2.1º
φ and ω scansh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.970, Tmax = 0.980l = −18→22
5375 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.153  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0724P)2 + 0.2527P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.02(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1959 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
145 parametersΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.8038 (2)0.1591 (3)0.16857 (10)0.0416 (5)
N20.6692 (2)−0.1164 (3)0.15749 (10)0.0443 (6)
N30.9292 (3)0.4340 (3)0.18935 (10)0.0483 (6)
H30.89560.41990.23140.058*
O11.0871 (3)0.6171 (3)0.12288 (10)0.0856 (8)
C10.7455 (3)0.0253 (3)0.12480 (11)0.0391 (6)
C20.6113 (3)−0.2514 (4)0.11782 (13)0.0480 (7)
C30.6280 (3)−0.2537 (4)0.04464 (14)0.0546 (7)
H3A0.5891−0.35460.01920.066*
C40.6991 (3)−0.1130 (4)0.01004 (12)0.0472 (7)
C50.7602 (3)0.0348 (3)0.05134 (12)0.0410 (6)
C60.8324 (3)0.1936 (4)0.02437 (13)0.0498 (7)
H60.84250.2063−0.02380.060*
C70.8875 (3)0.3283 (4)0.06768 (13)0.0519 (7)
H70.93310.43510.04990.062*
C80.8742 (3)0.3032 (3)0.14080 (12)0.0415 (6)
C90.5235 (4)−0.4030 (4)0.15366 (15)0.0654 (8)
H9A0.5582−0.40540.20230.098*
H9B0.5514−0.51730.13220.098*
H9C0.4045−0.38390.14960.098*
C100.7102 (4)−0.1127 (4)−0.06836 (13)0.0670 (9)
H10A0.6876−0.2334−0.08610.100*
H10B0.8208−0.0758−0.08090.100*
H10C0.6291−0.0287−0.08820.100*
C111.0292 (3)0.5810 (4)0.17874 (14)0.0531 (7)
C121.0655 (4)0.6957 (4)0.24196 (16)0.0728 (9)
H12A1.16890.76050.23640.109*
H12B1.07490.61880.28270.109*
H12C0.97590.78180.24750.109*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0491 (12)0.0434 (12)0.0325 (11)−0.0017 (10)0.0048 (9)0.0003 (10)
N20.0509 (12)0.0426 (13)0.0394 (12)0.0014 (10)0.0001 (9)0.0032 (10)
N30.0605 (13)0.0505 (14)0.0348 (11)−0.0094 (11)0.0131 (10)−0.0031 (10)
O10.1048 (17)0.1011 (18)0.0518 (13)−0.0489 (14)0.0190 (12)0.0028 (12)
C10.0413 (13)0.0436 (15)0.0323 (13)0.0071 (11)0.0007 (10)−0.0007 (11)
C20.0502 (15)0.0443 (16)0.0490 (16)0.0052 (12)−0.0052 (13)0.0001 (13)
C30.0593 (17)0.0520 (18)0.0515 (17)0.0047 (14)−0.0120 (14)−0.0105 (14)
C40.0478 (15)0.0560 (17)0.0376 (14)0.0117 (13)−0.0033 (11)−0.0068 (13)
C50.0408 (13)0.0503 (16)0.0318 (13)0.0076 (12)0.0005 (10)0.0005 (12)
C60.0562 (15)0.0649 (18)0.0285 (13)0.0037 (14)0.0053 (11)0.0025 (13)
C70.0626 (17)0.0556 (17)0.0381 (14)−0.0031 (14)0.0096 (12)0.0073 (13)
C80.0463 (14)0.0448 (15)0.0339 (13)0.0024 (12)0.0073 (11)0.0011 (12)
C90.073 (2)0.0542 (19)0.069 (2)−0.0094 (15)−0.0014 (16)0.0020 (15)
C100.078 (2)0.085 (2)0.0372 (15)0.0111 (17)−0.0053 (14)−0.0135 (15)
C110.0555 (16)0.0564 (18)0.0479 (16)−0.0107 (14)0.0118 (13)0.0033 (14)
C120.087 (2)0.068 (2)0.065 (2)−0.0249 (18)0.0199 (16)−0.0170 (16)
N1—C81.313 (3)C5—C61.401 (3)
N1—C11.357 (3)C6—C71.349 (4)
N2—C21.318 (3)C6—H60.9300
N2—C11.363 (3)C7—C81.414 (3)
N3—C111.357 (3)C7—H70.9300
N3—C81.392 (3)C9—H9A0.9600
N3—H30.8600C9—H9B0.9600
O1—C111.204 (3)C9—H9C0.9600
C1—C51.411 (3)C10—H10A0.9600
C2—C31.406 (4)C10—H10B0.9600
C2—C91.488 (4)C10—H10C0.9600
C3—C41.356 (4)C11—C121.489 (4)
C3—H3A0.9300C12—H12A0.9600
C4—C51.414 (3)C12—H12B0.9600
C4—C101.501 (4)C12—H12C0.9600
C8—N1—C1118.2 (2)C8—C7—H7120.8
C2—N2—C1117.4 (2)N1—C8—N3114.4 (2)
C11—N3—C8128.2 (2)N1—C8—C7123.3 (2)
C11—N3—H3115.9N3—C8—C7122.3 (2)
C8—N3—H3115.9C2—C9—H9A109.5
N1—C1—N2114.5 (2)C2—C9—H9B109.5
N1—C1—C5122.5 (2)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
N2—C1—C5123.0 (2)C2—C9—H9C109.5
N2—C2—C3122.4 (2)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
N2—C2—C9117.0 (2)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C3—C2—C9120.5 (2)C4—C10—H10A109.5
C4—C3—C2121.9 (2)C4—C10—H10B109.5
C4—C3—H3A119.0H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C2—C3—H3A119.0C4—C10—H10C109.5
C3—C4—C5116.7 (2)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C3—C4—C10121.7 (2)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C4—C10121.6 (3)O1—C11—N3123.3 (3)
C6—C5—C1117.0 (2)O1—C11—C12121.6 (3)
C6—C5—C4124.5 (2)N3—C11—C12115.1 (2)
C1—C5—C4118.5 (2)C11—C12—H12A109.5
C7—C6—C5120.6 (2)C11—C12—H12B109.5
C7—C6—H6119.7H12A—C12—H12B109.5
C5—C6—H6119.7C11—C12—H12C109.5
C6—C7—C8118.4 (2)H12A—C12—H12C109.5
C6—C7—H7120.8H12B—C12—H12C109.5
  5 in total

1.  Improved selectivity for the binding of naphthyridine dimer to guanine-guanine mismatch.

Authors:  K Nakatani; S Sando; I Saito
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  1,8-Naphthyridines IV. 9-substituted N,N-dialkyl-5-(alkylamino or cycloalkylamino) [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1, 8]naphthyridine-6-carboxamides, new compounds with anti-aggressive and potent anti-inflammatory activities.

Authors:  G Roma; M Di Braccio; G Grossi; F Mattioli; M Ghia
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Gold(I) and silver(I) metallocryptates based on 2,9-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,8-naphthyridine.

Authors:  V J Catalano; H M Kar; B L Bennett
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-01-10       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of certain quinolone derivatives.

Authors:  Y L Chen; K C Fang; J Y Sheu; S L Hsu; C C Tzeng
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Synthesis and beta-blocking activity of (R,S)-(E)-oximeethers of 2, 3-dihydro-1,8-naphthyridine and 2,3-dihydrothiopyrano[2, 3-b]pyridine:potential antihypertensive agents - part IX.

Authors:  P L Ferrarini; C Mori; M Badawneh; V Calderone; R Greco; C Manera; A Martinelli; P Nieri; G Saccomanni
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.514

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  2,7-Bis-(trichloro-meth-yl)-1,8-naphthyridine.

Authors:  Hoong-Kun Fun; Suchada Chantrapromma; Annada C Maity; Shyamaprosad Goswami
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-02-13

2.  N-(7-Dibromo-methyl-5-methyl-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl)acetamide-pyrrolidine-2,5-dione (1/1).

Authors:  Gao-Zhang Gou; Jun-Feng Kou; Qing-Di Zhou; Shao-Ming Chi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-01-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.