Literature DB >> 21199886

Identification of a serum-detectable metabolomic fingerprint potentially correlated with the presence of micrometastatic disease in early breast cancer patients at varying risks of disease relapse by traditional prognostic methods.

C Oakman1, L Tenori2, W M Claudino1, S Cappadona1, S Nepi2, A Battaglia1, P Bernini3, E Zafarana1, E Saccenti3, M Fornier4, P G Morris4, L Biganzoli1, C Luchinat5, I Bertini5, A Di Leo6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognostic tools in early breast cancer are inadequate. The evolving field of metabolomics may allow more accurate identification of patients with residual micrometastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four early breast cancer patients with pre- and postoperative serum samples had metabolomic assessment by nuclear magnetic resonance. Fifty-one metastatic patients served as control. Differential clustering was identified and used to calculate individual early patient 'metabolomic risk', calculated as inverse distance of each early patient from the metastatic cluster barycenter. Metabolomic risk was compared with Adjuvantionline 10-year mortality assessment.
RESULTS: Innate serum metabolomic differences exist between early and metastatic patients. Preoperative patients were identified with 75% sensitivity, 69% specificity and 72% predictive accuracy. Comparison with Adjuvantionline revealed discordance. Of 21 patients assessed as high risk by Adjuvantionline, 10 (48%) and 6 (29%) were at high risk by metabolomics in pre- and postoperative settings, respectively. Of 23 low-risk patients by Adjuvantionline, 11 (48%) preoperative and 20 (87%) postoperative patients were at low risk by metabolomics.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies metabolomic discrimination between early and metastatic breast cancer. Micrometastatic disease may account for metabolomic misclassification of some early patients as metastatic. Metabolomics identifies more patients as low relapse risk compared with Adjuvantionline. Further exploration of this metabolomic fingerprint is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199886     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  35 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomic profiling of hormone-dependent cancers: a bird's eye view.

Authors:  Stacy M Lloyd; James Arnold; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 12.015

2.  Serum Metabolomic Profiles Identify ER-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients at Increased Risk of Disease Recurrence in a Multicenter Population.

Authors:  Christopher D Hart; Alessia Vignoli; Leonardo Tenori; Gemma Leonora Uy; Ta Van To; Clement Adebamowo; Syed Mozammel Hossain; Laura Biganzoli; Emanuela Risi; Richard R Love; Claudio Luchinat; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Serum metabolomic profiles evaluated after surgery may identify patients with oestrogen receptor negative early breast cancer at increased risk of disease recurrence. Results from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Leonardo Tenori; Catherine Oakman; Patrick G Morris; Ewa Gralka; Natalie Turner; Silvia Cappadona; Monica Fornier; Cliff Hudis; Larry Norton; Claudio Luchinat; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 4.  Breast Cancer Metabolism.

Authors:  Jessica Tan; Anne Le
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Breast cancer risk in relation to plasma metabolites among Hispanic and African American women.

Authors:  Hua Zhao; Jie Shen; Steven C Moore; Yuanqing Ye; Xifeng Wu; Francisco J Esteva; Debasish Tripathy; Wong-Ho Chow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Metabolomics approach for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Siwei Wei; Lingyan Liu; Jian Zhang; Jeremiah Bowers; G A Nagana Gowda; Harald Seeger; Tanja Fehm; Hans J Neubauer; Ulrich Vogel; Susan E Clare; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Exploration of serum metabolomic profiles and outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Leonardo Tenori; Catherine Oakman; Wederson M Claudino; Patrizia Bernini; Silvia Cappadona; Stefano Nepi; Laura Biganzoli; Michael C Arbushites; Claudio Luchinat; Ivano Bertini; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Metabolic phenotyping in clinical and surgical environments.

Authors:  Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes; James M Kinross; Ara W Darzi; Zoltan Takats; John C Lindon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Metabolome-Wide Association Study of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  L Goodwin Burgess; Karan Uppal; Douglas I Walker; Rachel M Roberson; ViLinh Tran; Megan B Parks; Emily A Wade; Alexandra T May; Allison C Umfress; Kelli L Jarrell; Brooklyn O C Stanley; John Kuchtey; Rachel W Kuchtey; Dean P Jones; Milam A Brantley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Metabolic biomarker signature for predicting the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojie Lin; Rui Xu; Siying Mao; Yuzhu Zhang; Yan Dai; Qianqian Guo; Xue Song; Qingling Zhang; Li Li; Qianjun Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.