Literature DB >> 21199671

Spontaneous acceptance of mouse kidney allografts is associated with increased Foxp3 expression and differences in the B and T cell compartments.

Chuanmin Wang1, Shaun Cordoba, Min Hu, Patrick Bertolino, David G Bowen, Alexandra F Sharland, Richard D M Allen, Stephen I Alexander, Geoffrey W McCaughan, G Alex Bishop.   

Abstract

Spontaneous acceptance of organ allografts can identify novel mechanisms of drug-free transplantation tolerance. Spontaneous acceptance occurs in both mouse kidney transplants and rat liver transplants however the early immune processes of mouse kidney acceptance have not been studied. Acceptance of C57BL/6 strain kidney allografts in fully MHC-incompatible B10.BR recipients was compared with rejection (REJ) of heart allografts in the same strain combination. Graft infiltrate and antibody deposition were examined by immunohistochemical staining. Expression of mRNA was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Apoptosis was examined by TUNEL staining. The majority of kidney allografts were accepted long-term and induced tolerance (TOL) of donor-strain skin grafts, showing that acceptance was not due to immune ignorance. There was an extensive infiltrate of T cells in the TOL kidney that exceeded the level in REJ hearts but subsequently declined. The main differences were deposition of IgG2a antibody in REJ that was absent in TOL, more B cells infiltrating TOL kidneys and a progressive increase in the ratio of CD8:CD4 cells during rejection. There was also significantly greater Foxp3 mRNA expression in TOL. Kidneys from RAG-/- donors were accepted, showing that donor lymphocytes were not necessary for acceptance. Neutralising antibodies to TGF-β administered from day 0 to day 6 did not prevent TOL. On the basis of cytokine expression and apoptosis there was no evidence for immune deviation or deletion as mechanisms of acceptance. In accord with the findings of spontaneous acceptance of liver allografts in rats, the main difference between mouse kidney TOL and heart REJ was in the B cell compartment. The major difference to rat liver allograft acceptance was that apoptosis of infiltrate did not appear to play a role. Instead, increased Foxp3 expression in TOL kidneys implies that regulatory T cells might be important.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199671     DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Immunol        ISSN: 0966-3274            Impact factor:   1.708


  15 in total

Review 1.  Why some organ allografts are tolerated better than others: new insights for an old question.

Authors:  Travis D Hull; Gilles Benichou; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  Lessons and limits of mouse models.

Authors:  Anita S Chong; Maria-Luisa Alegre; Michelle L Miller; Robert L Fairchild
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Bidirectional alloreactivity: A proposed microchimerism-based solution to the NIMA paradox.

Authors:  William J Burlingham; Gilles Benichou
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2012-04-01

4.  A20-mediated modulation of inflammatory and immune responses in aortic allografts and development of transplant arteriosclerosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Siracuse; Mark D Fisher; Cleide G da Silva; Clayton R Peterson; Eva Csizmadia; Herwig P Moll; Scott M Damrauer; Peter Studer; Lynn Y Choi; Sanah Essayagh; Elzbieta Kaczmarek; Elizabeth R Maccariello; Andy Lee; Soizic Daniel; Christiane Ferran
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Organ-specific differences in achieving tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Lucia L Madariaga; Daniel Kreisel; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.640

6.  Pretransplant immune regulation predicts allograft outcome: bidirectional regulation correlates with excellent renal transplant function in living-related donor-recipient pairs.

Authors:  Ewa Jankowska-Gan; Adam Sheka; Hans W Sollinger; John D Pirsch; R Michael Hofmann; Lynn D Haynes; Michael J Armbrust; Joshua D Mezrich; William J Burlingham
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Immunosuppressive effects of erythropoietin on human alloreactive T cells.

Authors:  Paolo Cravedi; Joaquin Manrique; Katherine E Hanlon; Jessica Reid-Adam; Joshua Brody; Praeophayom Prathuangsuk; Anita Mehrotra; Peter S Heeger
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 8.  Heart transplantation: challenges facing the field.

Authors:  Makoto Tonsho; Sebastian Michel; Zain Ahmed; Alessandro Alessandrini; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  A modified method for heterotopic mouse heart transplantion.

Authors:  Chuanmin Wang; Zane Wang; Richard Allen; G Alex Bishop; Alexandra F Sharland
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Donor-specific indirect pathway analysis reveals a B-cell-independent signature which reflects outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  L D Haynes; E Jankowska-Gan; A Sheka; M R Keller; M P Hernandez-Fuentes; R I Lechler; V Seyfert-Margolis; L A Turka; K A Newell; W J Burlingham
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.