Literature DB >> 21198897

Analysis of the pattern of the alveolar ridge remodelling following single tooth extraction.

U Covani1, M Ricci, G Bozzolo, F Mangano, A Zini, A Barone.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tooth extraction is followed by marked osseous changes of the residual alveolar ridge including severe bone alterations both in height and in width. However, such remodelling could jeopardize the subsequent implant insertion for two main reasons. Firstly, the absence of adequate bone levels makes implant placement impossible; secondly, aesthetic problems in the fabrication of implanto-supported restoration could be caused by serious bone re-absorption. Thus, it is of crucial importance that the dental surgeon knows how the alveolar crest changes when a single tooth has been removed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of alveolar crest remodelling observed in a single intercalated area of tooth extraction after at least a period of 6 months of healing, using standardized photos of model casts.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among the patients who were treated for a single intercalated tooth extraction during the last 2 years at the department of dentistry at Versilia Hospital, Lido di Camaiore (Lucca), Italy, we selected 50 patients. The amount of alveolar crest remodelling was assessed on standardized photos of study models. All measurement were recorded on an Excel sheet (Excel, Windows XP(®)) and each value was multiplied by the enlargement index so that true values of re-absorption could be obtained. Finally, we have calculated the percentage of amount of alveolar crest remodelling and shifting of alveolar crest.
RESULTS: We calculated the percentage of buccal remodelling and alveolar crest shift. The buccal re-absorption was 19.4 ± 9.4% at mesial point, 39.1 ± 10.4% at midpoint and 20.3 ± 10.7% at distal level. Moreover, the shift of the alveolar crest was 59.1 ± 11.2% at mesial point, 64.8 ± 10.5% at the midpoint and 56 ± 12.5% at distal point.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that buccal wall tends to re-absorb after the extraction according to a specific pattern. Thus, the re-absorption at the midpoint represent the double of bone loss at the distal and the mesial points. Furthermore, we have observed first how the alveolar crest shifts placing along the more lingual/palatal line which divides the original alveolar crest into three parts.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21198897     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  14 in total

1.  Determinants of alveolar ridge preservation differ by anatomic location.

Authors:  Binnaz Leblebicioglu; Mabel Salas; Yirae Ort; Ashley Johnson; Vedat O Yildiz; Do-Gyoon Kim; Sudha Agarwal; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Immediate Placement of Zirconia Implants in Teeth with Periapical Lesions: A Case Report.

Authors:  Nizar A Ahmed; Caroline Annette Jacob; Preetham Prasad Nittla
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Effect of ultraviolet photofunctionalization of dental titanium implants on osseointegration.

Authors:  Christian Mehl; Matthias Kern; Friederike Neumann; Telse Bähr; Jörg Wiltfang; Volker Gassling
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series.

Authors:  Ioannis Konstantinidis; Tarun Kumar; Udatta Kher; Panagiotis D Stanitsas; James E Hinrichs; Georgios A Kotsakis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  The endoscopically assisted transcrestal sinus floor elevation with platelet-rich fibrin at an immediate implantation of periapical lesion site: A case report.

Authors:  Hanchi Wang; Jia Wang; Tianqi Guo; Xinxin Ding; Wanqi Yu; Jinghui Zhao; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  The Relevance of the Use of Radiographic Planning in Order to Avoid Complications in Mandibular Implantology: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gilberto Sammartino; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos; Francesco Riccitiello; Pietro Felice; Vincenzo Cerone; Roberta Gasparro; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Soft Tissue Stability around Single Implants Inserted to Replace Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A 3D Evaluation.

Authors:  F G Mangano; F Luongo; G Picciocchi; C Mortellaro; K B Park; C Mangano
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-05-19

8.  Effectiveness of buccal pouch grafting in minimizing loss of alveolar dimension: A canine investigation.

Authors:  Ehsan Birang; Douglas Deporter; Reza Birang; Meysam Mahabadi; Eshetu Atenafu; Mohammad Ketabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019-09-05

9.  Influence of the implant-abutment connection on the ratio between height and thickness of tissues at the buccal zenith: a randomized controlled trial on 188 implants placed in 104 patients.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Pietro Mario Pasini; Mattia Manfredini; Cristian Scognamiglio; Andrea Alain Orsina; Marco Farronato
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Myofibroblast Gene Expression Profile after Tooth Extraction in the Rabbit.

Authors:  Simone Marconcini; Maria Denaro; Saverio Cosola; Mario Gabriele; Paolo Toti; Eitan Mijiritsky; Agnese Proietti; Fulvio Basolo; Enrica Giammarinaro; Ugo Covani
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.