Literature DB >> 21198250

Interruption management in the intensive care unit: Predicting resumption times and assessing distributed support.

Tobias Grundgeiger1, Penelope Sanderson, Hamish G MacDougall, Balasubramanian Venkatesh.   

Abstract

Interruptions are frequent in many work domains. Researchers in health care have started to study interruptions extensively, but their studies usually do not use a theoretically guided approach. Conversely, researchers conducting theoretically rich laboratory studies on interruptions have not usually investigated how effectively their findings account for humans working in complex systems such as intensive care units. In the current study, we use the memory for goals theory and prospective memory theory to investigate which properties of an interruption influence how long it takes nurses to resume interrupted critical care tasks. We collected data with a mobile eye tracker in an intensive care unit and developed multiple regression models to predict resumption times. In 55.8% of all interruptions there was a finite-and therefore analyzable-resumption lag. For these cases, the main regression model explained 30.9% (adjusted R²) of the variance. Longer interruptions (β=.36, p<.001) and changes in physical location due to interruptions (β=.40, p<.001) lengthened the resumption lag. We also calculated regression models on subsets of the data to investigate the generality of the above findings across different situations. In a further 37.6% of all interruptions, nurses used behavioral strategies that greatly diminished or eliminated individual prospective memory demands caused by interruptions, resulting in no analyzable resumption lag. We introduce a descriptive model that accounts for how nurses' behaviors affect the cognitive demand of resuming an interrupted task. Finally, we discuss how the disruptive effects of interruptions in the intensive care unit could be diminished or prevented. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21198250     DOI: 10.1037/a0021912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  16 in total

1.  How do interruptions impact nurses' visual scanning patterns when using barcode medication administration systems?

Authors:  Ze He; Jenna L Marquard; Philip L Henneman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Thinking Together: Modeling Clinical Decision-Support as a Sociotechnical System.

Authors:  Mustafa I Hussain; Tera L Reynolds; Fatemeh E Mousavi; Yunan Chen; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Health care research that delivers: introduction to the special issue on cognitive factors in health care.

Authors:  Daniel G Morrow; Francis T Durso
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2011-09

4.  Pain-Contingent Interruption and Resumption of Work Goals: A Within-Day Diary Analysis.

Authors:  Morris Okun; Paul Karoly; Chung Jung Mun; Hanjoe Kim
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Investigating how implementation intentions improve non-focal prospective memory tasks.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Melissa D McConnell Rogers; Jennifer C McVay; Joshua A Lopez; Shayne Loft
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-06-12

6.  A fresh pair of eyes on prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Eddie A Christopher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

7.  Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions.

Authors:  Mindy E Flanagan; Jason J Saleem; Laura G Millitello; Alissa L Russ; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-09-01

9.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Interruptions of activities experienced by nursing professionals in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Daniele de Oliveira Prates; Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.