Literature DB >> 21194571

Translation of flecainide- and mexiletine-induced cardiac sodium channel inhibition and ventricular conduction slowing from nonclinical models to clinical.

B M Heath1, Y Cui, S Worton, B Lawton, G Ward, E Ballini, C P A Doe, C Ellis, B A Patel, N C McMahon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nonclinical in vivo models used for cardiovascular safety testing have not previously been studied for their sensitivity for detection of conduction slowing resulting from cardiac sodium channel block. The goal of this study was to examine the sensitivity of in vivo models to cardiac sodium channel block, and translation of the effect from in vitro to in vivo models using sodium channel inhibitors flecainide and mexiletine; flecainide, but not mexiletine is commonly associated with QRS complex prolongation in humans.
METHODS: Inhibition of cloned cardiac sodium channels (hNav1.5) was studied using the IonWorks platform. Conduction slowing was measured in vitro in the rabbit isolated ventricular wedge (RVW) and in vivo in the conscious telemetered rat and dog, and anaesthetised dog.
RESULTS: Flecainide and mexiletine inhibited hNav1.5 channels with IC50 values of 10.7 and 67.2 μM respectively. In the RVW, QRS was increased by flecainide at 60 bpm, and at 120bpm, there was an increased effect of both drugs. In conscious rats, flecainide significantly increased QRS complex duration; mexiletine had no significant effect, but there was an increase at the highest dose in 4/6 animals. QRS complex was increased by flecainide and mexiletine in anaesthetised dogs but this was not statistically significant; in conscious dog, only flecainide produced a significant increase in QRS complex. DISCUSSION: When compared to clinical data, effects of flecainide and mexiletine in RVW and conscious dog compared well with effects in patients and healthy volunteers in terms of sensitivity. The anaesthetised dog was least sensitive for detection of changes in QRS. All assays showed some differentiation between the expected conduction slowing activity of flecainide and mexiletine. Based on these data, RVW and conscious dog were most predictive for effects of compounds on QRS complex and cardiac conduction.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21194571     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  11 in total

Review 1.  Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling.

Authors:  Joanne Bowes; Andrew J Brown; Jacques Hamon; Wolfgang Jarolimek; Arun Sridhar; Gareth Waldron; Steven Whitebread
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  The 'overly-sensitive' heart: sodium channel block and QRS interval prolongation.

Authors:  Gary A Gintant; David J Gallacher; Michael K Pugsley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Dominant rule of community effect in synchronized beating behavior of cardiomyocyte networks.

Authors:  Kenji Yasuda
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  Impact of Astroglial Connexins on Modafinil Pharmacological Properties.

Authors:  Adeline Duchêne; Magali Perier; Yan Zhao; Xinhe Liu; Julien Thomasson; Frédéric Chauveau; Christophe Piérard; Didier Lagarde; Christèle Picoli; Tiffany Jeanson; Franck Mouthon; Yves Dauvilliers; Christian Giaume; Jian-Sheng Lin; Mathieu Charvériat
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 5.  The role of late I Na in development of cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Vladislav Nesterenko; John C Shryock; Sridharan Rajamani; Yejia Song; Luiz Belardinelli
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2014

6.  Predicting QRS and PR interval prolongations in humans using nonclinical data.

Authors:  L Bergenholm; J Parkinson; J Mettetal; N D Evans; M J Chappell; T Collins
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Murine Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher L-H Huang
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Cardiac Safety Implications of hNav1.5 Blockade and a Framework for Pre-Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Gül Erdemli; Albert M Kim; Haisong Ju; Clayton Springer; Robert C Penland; Peter K Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Deletion of PDK1 causes cardiac sodium current reduction in mice.

Authors:  Zhonglin Han; Yu Jiang; Yuqing Yang; Xuehan Li; Zhongzhou Yang; Kejiang Cao; Dao W Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On-chip spatiotemporal electrophysiological analysis of human stem cell derived cardiomyocytes enables quantitative assessment of proarrhythmia in drug development.

Authors:  Yumiko Asahi; Tomoyo Hamada; Akihiro Hattori; Kenji Matsuura; Masao Odaka; Fumimasa Nomura; Tomoyuki Kaneko; Yasuyuki Abe; Kiyoshi Takasuna; Atsushi Sanbuissho; Kenji Yasuda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.