Literature DB >> 21193764

Development of a clinical guideline to predict undiagnosed diabetes in dental patients.

Shanshan Li1, Paige L Williams, Chester W Douglass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2007, 17.9 million people in the United States had diagnosed diabetes, and 5.7 million had undiagnosed diabetes. The authors developed a clinical guideline to help dentists identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes.
METHODS: The authors used classification and regression tree (CART) methods to generate different prediction models using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) (1988-1994) and data from NHANES 2003-2004 for external validation. They classified participants who answered "No" to the question "Have you ever been told by a physician that you have diabetes?" and who had a fasting plasma glucose level greater than or equal to 126 milligrams per deciliter as having undiagnosed diabetes. The authors used oral examination data regarding the presence or absence of periodontitis and waist circumference, as well as data on participants' self-reported oral health status, weight, age, family history and race or ethnicity. The authors chose the best prediction model by means of 10-fold cross-validation, as well as internal and external validation methods, which evaluated each prediction model by comparing sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and ease of use criteria (N = 7,545).
RESULTS: The authors' final clinical guideline for predicting undiagnosed diabetes in dental patients had a sensitivity of 82.4 percent, a specificity of 52.8 percent and a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.72. They found that waist circumference, age, self-reported oral health status, self-reported race or ethnicity and self-reported weight information could be used to predict the risk of having undiagnosed diabetes (range, 0.1 to 9.1 percent).
CONCLUSION: Dental care providers should consider using a clinical guideline that includes the following predictors: waist circumference, age, self-reported oral health, self-reported weight and self-reported race or ethnicity, as well as any additional information on periodontal status and family history of diabetes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This clinical guideline could help dentists identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes, resulting in the early identification of dental patients who require treatment for diabetes and, thus, reduce morbidity and health care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21193764     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  13 in total

1.  Diabetes and oral disease: implications for health professionals.

Authors:  David A Albert; Angela Ward; Pamela Allweiss; Dana T Graves; William C Knowler; Carol Kunzel; Rudolph L Leibel; Karen F Novak; Thomas W Oates; Panos N Papapanou; Ann Marie Schmidt; George W Taylor; Ira B Lamster; Evanthia Lalla
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Diabetes mellitus and periodontitis: a tale of two common interrelated diseases.

Authors:  Evanthia Lalla; Panos N Papapanou
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  A novel intraoral diabetes screening approach in periodontal patients: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Janet Tuthill; Geetika Singh; David Rindskopf; Jack A Maggiore; Robert Schoor; Anya Brodsky; Adi Einhorn; Amanda Hochstein; Stefanie Russell; Mary Rosedale
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Screening for Diabetes Risk Using Integrated Dental and Medical Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  A Acharya; B Cheng; R Koralkar; B Olson; I B Lamster; C Kunzel; E Lalla
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2018-02-26

5.  Diabetes-related knowledge and sources of information among periodontal patients: is there a role for dental hygienists?

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Geetika Singh; Janet Tuthill; Anya Brodsky; Mary Rosedale; Ariana Bytyci; Inna Drayluk; Alisa Llambiri; Krystal Savice; Stefanie Russell
Journal:  J Dent Hyg       Date:  2013-04

6.  Insurer views on reimbursement of preventive services in the dental setting: results from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rebecca T Feinstein-Winitzer; Harold A Pollack; Carrigan L Parish; Margaret R Pereyra; Stephen N Abel; Lisa R Metsch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey.

Authors:  Rahsan Cevik Akyil; Ozkan Miloglu; Nermin Olgun; Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Resampling methods improve the predictive power of modeling in class-imbalanced datasets.

Authors:  Paul H Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Reliability of gingival blood sample to screen diabetes in dental hospital.

Authors:  Suneetha Koneru; Rambabu Tanikonda
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2015-03-20

10.  Screening for dysglycaemia in dental primary care practice settings: systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Ingrid Glurich; Barbara Bartkowiak; Richard L Berg; Amit Acharya
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.607

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.