Rebecca T Feinstein-Winitzer1, Harold A Pollack, Carrigan L Parish, Margaret R Pereyra, Stephen N Abel, Lisa R Metsch. 1. Rebecca T. Feinstein-Winitzer and Harold A. Pollack are with the School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Carrigan L. Parish, Margaret R. Pereyra, and Lisa R. Metsch are with the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Stephen N. Abel is with the School of Dental Medicine, University of Buffalo, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored insurers' perceptions regarding barriers to reimbursement for oral rapid HIV testing and other preventive screenings during dental care. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews between April and October 2010 with a targeted sample of 13 dental insurance company executives and consultants, whose firms' cumulative market share exceeded 50% of US employer-based dental insurance markets. Participants represented viewpoints from a significant share of the dental insurance industry. RESULTS: Some preventive screenings, such as for oral cancer, received widespread insurer support and reimbursement. Others, such as population-based HIV screening, appeared to face many barriers to insurance reimbursement. The principal barriers were minimal employer demand, limited evidence of effectiveness and return on investment specific to dental settings, implementation and organizational constraints, lack of provider training, and perceived lack of patient acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The dental setting is a promising venue for preventive screenings, and addressing barriers to insurance reimbursement for such services is a key challenge for public health policy.
OBJECTIVES: We explored insurers' perceptions regarding barriers to reimbursement for oral rapid HIV testing and other preventive screenings during dental care. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews between April and October 2010 with a targeted sample of 13 dental insurance company executives and consultants, whose firms' cumulative market share exceeded 50% of US employer-based dental insurance markets. Participants represented viewpoints from a significant share of the dental insurance industry. RESULTS: Some preventive screenings, such as for oral cancer, received widespread insurer support and reimbursement. Others, such as population-based HIV screening, appeared to face many barriers to insurance reimbursement. The principal barriers were minimal employer demand, limited evidence of effectiveness and return on investment specific to dental settings, implementation and organizational constraints, lack of provider training, and perceived lack of patient acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The dental setting is a promising venue for preventive screenings, and addressing barriers to insurance reimbursement for such services is a key challenge for public health policy.
Authors: Bernard M Branson; H Hunter Handsfield; Margaret A Lampe; Robert S Janssen; Allan W Taylor; Sheryl B Lyss; Jill E Clark Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2006-09-22
Authors: David A Albert; Herb Severson; Judith Gordon; Angela Ward; Judy Andrews; Don Sadowsky Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Harold A Pollack; Margaret Pereyra; Carrigan L Parish; Stephen Abel; Shari Messinger; Richard Singer; Carol Kunzel; Barbara Greenberg; Barbara Gerbert; Michael Glick; Lisa R Metsch Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Carrigan L Parish; Karolynn Siegel; Terri Liguori; Stephen N Abel; Harold A Pollack; Margaret R Pereyra; Lisa R Metsch Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2017-08-18