Literature DB >> 21193701

Ultrasound is safe... right?: resident and maternal-fetal medicine fellow knowledge regarding obstetric ultrasound safety.

Laura E Houston1, Jenifer Allsworth, George A Macones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was created to assess the knowledge levels of postgraduate year 4 obstetrics and gynecology residents and maternal-fetal medicine fellows in the United States regarding the safety of obstetric ultrasound and the use of the output display standard.
METHODS: An electronic survey was submitted to each Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency and each maternal-fetal medicine fellowship program in the United States over 2 academic years from 2008 to 2010.
RESULTS: A total of 165 surveys were completed (67 by postgraduate year 4 obstetrics and gynecology residents and 92 by maternal-fetal medicine fellows). In total, 13.4% of residents and 20.9% of maternal-fetal medicine fellows knew how to find or use the output display standard, and 10.9% of residents and 22.7% of fellows reported use of the output display standard during their ultrasound examinations. Overall, 37% to 46% of residents and fellows reported no limitations to the use of obstetric ultrasound and 22% to 39% reported no limitations to the use of Doppler ultrasound in the first, second, and third trimesters. Maternal-fetal medicine fellow knowledge of ultrasound safety generally improved with each year of training; however, only 34.8% of third-year fellows reported use of the output display standard.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, obstetrics and gynecology resident knowledge of obstetric ultrasound safety is low. Maternal-fetal medicine fellow knowledge is stronger overall; however, few are using the output display standard routinely in their last year of fellowship training. This study provides evidence of the need for improved education on the subject of obstetric ultrasound safety.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21193701     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound education in obstetrics and gynecology: Hawai'i experience.

Authors:  Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Shelby Wong; Ivica Zalud
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-05

2.  Survey of current practice in clinical transvaginal ultrasound scanning in the UK.

Authors:  Eleanor Martin; Adam Shaw; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-04-28

3.  Severity of ASD symptoms and their correlation with the presence of copy number variations and exposure to first trimester ultrasound.

Authors:  Sara Jane Webb; Michelle M Garrison; Raphael Bernier; Abbi M McClintic; Bryan H King; Pierre D Mourad
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.216

4.  Patient understanding of diagnostic ultrasound examinations in an Australian private radiology clinic.

Authors:  Amy Starcevich; Paul Lombardo; Michal Schneider
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-11-29

5.  National survey of Australian sonographer knowledge and behaviour surrounding the ALARA principles when conducting the 11-14-week obstetric screening ultrasound.

Authors:  Geraldene Carruthers Beirne; Susan Campbell Westerway; Curtise Kin Cheung Ng
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-05-20

6.  An Automated Region-Selection Method for Adaptive ALARA Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Katelyn M Flint; Emily C Barre; Matthew T Huber; Patricia J McNally; Sarah C Ellestad; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Ultrasound biosafety: Knowledge and opinions of health practitioners who perform obstetric scans in South Africa.

Authors:  Salome E Mashiane; Barbara van Dyk; Yasmin Casmod
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2019-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.