Literature DB >> 2119266

Screening and surveillance of pregnancy hypertension--an economic approach to the use of daycare.

K Rosenberg, S Twaddle.   

Abstract

Frequent measurement of blood pressure is an accepted part of routine outpatient antenatal care. Women found to have mild hypertension may be further monitored for signs of progressive disease, while women with proteinuria or severe hypertension may be admitted for more intensive surveillance or treatment. In practice, the course and ultimate severity of this disorder are unpredictable and women with mild hypertension are frequently admitted. Recently, daycare has grown as an option for assessing women with hypertension as it offers the advantage of more extensive evaluation than is possible at an outpatient clinic and is widely assumed to be more cost-effective than conventional management. However, its use in obstetrics has not been subject to a formal economic appraisal. Such an evaluation is currently being carried out in two hospitals in Scotland, one of which uses daycare and inpatient admissions in the management of hypertension and one of which uses domiciliary midwife visits as well as hospital beds. Preliminary results suggest that the pregnancy outcome in terms of birthweight, gestation at delivery, admission to a special unit, etc., are the same in the two units for women with mild hypertension (diastolic 90-99 mmHg, no proteinuria). The costs per patient were less in the hospital with a daycare unit. These lower individual costs, however, do not mean that the overall costs to the health service are less in a hospital with daycare. This will depend on the average number of visits to daycare for women with mild hypertension, the proportion of hypertensive women receiving daycare, whether freed inpatient beds are closed or redeployed, and the capital costs of establishing a day unit. Data has also been collected on women's costs and views which will ultimately be presented and should play a part in any decision to implement or continue daycare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2119266     DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80214-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0950-3552


  10 in total

Review 1.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Nonpharmacologic management and prevention of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Authors:  J M Moutquin; P R Garner; R F Burrows; E Rey; M E Helewa; I R Lange; S W Rabkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Effect of a fetal surveillance unit.

Authors:  S Twaddle; V Harper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-14

3.  Is day care equivalent to inpatient care for active rheumatoid arthritis? Randomised controlled clinical and economic evaluation.

Authors:  C M Lambert; N P Hurst; J F Forbes; A Lochhead; M Macleod; G Nuki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

4.  Genetic thromobophilia in pregnancy: a case-control study among North Indian women.

Authors:  Lovejeet Kaur; Manju Puri; Shweta Kaushik; Mohinder Pal Sachdeva; Shubha Sagar Trivedi; Kallur Nava Saraswathy
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Antioxidants in Pregnancy: Do We Really Need More Trials?

Authors:  Carolina Di Fabrizio; Veronica Giorgione; Asma Khalil; Colin E Murdoch
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 6.  Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Philippa Middleton; Andrew Weeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

7.  Blood pressure assessments of pregnant women in a Day Assessment Unit - A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Vidhu Krishnan; Angela Makris; AnneMarie Hennessy; Brian Hollis; Gaksoo Lee
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2019-12-04

8.  Antiplatelet agents for prevention of pre-eclampsia and its consequences: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Economic evaluation of Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) in South Asian and African countries: a study protocol.

Authors:  Asif R Khowaja; Craig Mitton; Stirling Bryan; Laura A Magee; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Peter von Dadelszen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Magpie Trial in the UK: methods and additional data for women and children at 2 years following pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Rebecca M D Smyth; Patsy Spark; Nina Armstrong; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.