Literature DB >> 21192213

Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus intralaminar C2 fixation in C2-C6 subaxial constructs.

Michael T Benke1, Joseph R O'Brien, Alexander W L Turner, Warren D Yu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative rigidity of C2 transpedicular versus intralaminar fixation with and without offset connectors in C2-C6 subaxial constructs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Insufficient biomechanical data exists on C2 laminar fixation in subaxial constructs, and no study has considered C2-C6 subaxial constructs or the use of offset connectors.
METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spines underwent rigidity testing in the intact condition and after a destabilizing C3-C6 laminectomy. Specimens were instrumented with 20 mm pedicle and 20 mm intralaminar screws at C2, and with 14 mm lateral mass screws from C3-C6. In random order, three conditions (C2 pedicle screws, C2 laminar screws, and C2 laminar screws with offset connectors) were tested in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending.
RESULTS: Laminar screws in C2-C6 constructs were equivalent to transpedicular fixation in flexion-extension (P = 0.985), were significantly more rigid than pedicle screws in axial rotation (P = 0.002), and were significantly less rigid than pedicle screws in lateral bending (P = 0.002). Laminar screw constructs were more rigid than the intact condition in all planes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21192213     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eea6e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Translaminar screws of the axis--an alternative technique for rigid screw fixation in upper cervical spine instability.

Authors:  D Meyer; F Meyer; Th Kretschmer; W Börm
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Simultaneous Use of Both Bilateral Intralaminar and Pedicle Screws for C2 Stabilization.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Tarukado; Osamu Tono; Toshio Doi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

3.  Feasibility of Sub-Axial Cervical Laminar Screws, Including C7, in the Indian Population: A Study on 50 Patients Using Computed Tomography-Based Morphometry Measurements.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Geetanjali Nanda; Rajat Mahajan; Ankur Nanda; Sahil Batra; Nirajana Mishra; Naveen Pandita; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-18

4.  Biomechanical study of C1 posterior arch crossing screw and C2 lamina screw fixations for atlantoaxial joint instability.

Authors:  Chuang Liu; Allieu Kamara; Yunhui Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Limited morbidity and possible radiographic benefit of C2 vs. subaxial cervical upper-most instrumented vertebrae.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cole A Bortz; Frank Segreto; Samantha Horn; Katherine E Pierce; Haddy Alas; Avery E Brown; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Breton Line; Robert Eastlack; Daniel M Sciubba; Eric O Klineberg; Alexandra Soroceanu; Douglas C Burton; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.