Literature DB >> 21191590

Chemoembolization decreases drop-off risk of hepatocellular carcinoma patients on the liver transplant list.

Constantine Frangakis1, Jean-Francois Geschwind, Daniel Kim, Yong Chen, Ayman Koteish, Kelvin Hong, Eleni Liapi, Christos S Georgiades.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The drop-off risk for patients awaiting liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is 22%. Transplant liver availability is expected to worsen, resulting in longer waiting times and increased drop-off rates. Our aim was to determine whether chemoembolization can decrease this risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven consecutive HCC patients listed for liver transplant (Milan criteria) underwent statistical comparability adjustments using the propensity score (Wilcoxon, Fisher's, and chi-square tests). Forty-three nonchemoembolization patients and 22 chemoembolization patients were comparable for Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, tumor size and number, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and cause of cirrhosis. We calculated the risk of dropping off the transplant list by assigning a transplant time to those who dropped off (equal probability with patients who were on the list longer than the patient in question). The significance level was obtained by calculating the simulation distribution of the difference compared with the permutations of chemoembolization versus nonchemoembolization assignment of the patients. Kaplan-Meier estimators (log-rank test) were used to determine survival rates.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 187 ± 110 weeks (range 38 to 435, date of diagnosis). The chemoembolization group had an 80% drop-off risk decrease (15% nonchemoembolization versus 3% chemoembolization, p = 0.04). Although survival was better for the chemoembolization group, it did not reach statistical significance. Two-year survival for the nonchemoembolization and chemoembolization group was 57.3% ± 7.1% and 76.0% ± 7.9%, respectively (p = 0.078).
CONCLUSIONS: Chemoembolization appears to result in a significant decrease in the risk of dropping off liver transplant list for patients with HCC and results in a tendency toward longer survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21191590      PMCID: PMC4137764          DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-0077-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  28 in total

1.  Milan criteria are useful predictors for favorable outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver transplantation after transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Do Young Kim; Moon Seok Choi; Joon Hyoek Lee; Kwang Cheol Koh; Seung Woon Paik; Byung Chul Yoo; Sung Wook Shin; Sung Wook Choo; Young Soo Do; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Response to preoperative chemoembolization correlates with outcome after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gunda Millonig; Ivo W Graziadei; Martin C Freund; Werner Jaschke; Sylvia Stadlmann; Ruth Ladurner; Raimund Margreiter; Wolfgang Vogel
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation in 60 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  G Otto; M Heise; C Moench; S Herber; F Bittinger; M Schuchmann; M Hoppe-Lotichius; M Pitton
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Patients without hepatocellular carcinoma progression after transarterial chemoembolization benefit from liver transplantation.

Authors:  Aiman Obed; Alexander Beham; Kerstin Püllmann; Heinz Becker; Hans J Schlitt; Thomas Lorf
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerd Otto; Sascha Herber; Michael Heise; Ansgar W Lohse; Christian Mönch; Fernando Bittinger; Maria Hoppe-Lotichius; Marcus Schuchmann; Anja Victor; Michael Pitton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 6.  Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephen H Caldwell; Deborah M Crespo; Hyon Scott Kang; Abdullah M S Al-Osaimi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Impact of pretransplantation transarterial chemoembolization on survival and recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Decaens; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Solange Bresson-Hadni; Carole Meyer; Jean Gugenheim; Francois Durand; Pierre-Henri Bernard; Olivier Boillot; Karim Boudjema; Yvon Calmus; Jean Hardwigsen; Christian Ducerf; Georges Philippe Pageaux; Sebastien Dharancy; Olivier Chazouilleres; Daniel Dhumeaux; Daniel Cherqui; Christophe Duvoux
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Disease course after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with complete tumor necrosis in liver explants after performance of bridging treatments.

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; M Malago; E P Molmenti; A Radtke; E I Brokalaki; S Nadalin; H Lang; A Frilling; H A Baba; H Kühl; R Verhagen; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.175

9.  Pre-liver transplantation locoregional adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma as a strategy to improve longterm survival.

Authors:  Ankit Bharat; Daniel B Brown; Jeffrey S Crippin; Jennifer E Gould; Jeffrey A Lowell; Surendra Shenoy; Niraj M Desai; William C Chapman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Deaths on the liver transplant waiting list: an analysis of competing risks.

Authors:  W Ray Kim; Terry M Therneau; Joanne T Benson; Walter K Kremers; Charles B Rosen; Gregory J Gores; E Rolland Dickson
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: past, present and future.

Authors:  Reza F Saidi; Seyed Kamran Hejazi Kenari
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2013-10

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: An Assessment of Benefits and Harms.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Amit G Singal; David W Hutton; Elliot B Tapper
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 12.045

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.