Literature DB >> 21189352

Prepared for anything?: an investigation of female genital arousal in response to rape cues.

Kelly D Suschinsky1, Martin L Lalumière.   

Abstract

Men's genital arousal occurs in response to a limited number of sexual stimuli, whereas women's genital arousal occurs in response to a wide range of sexual stimuli, including those depicting nonpreferred cues. Researchers have hypothesized that women's nonspecific pattern of genital arousal prepares the body for sexual activity, thus functioning to protect the genital organs against injury. If this hypothesis is correct, women should show genital responses to any cues suggesting sexual activity, even unappealing cues that involve nonconsensual sex and extreme violence. Fifteen men and 15 women listened to fourteen 2-min audiotaped narratives that depicted an interaction between a man and a woman and that varied factorially according to the presence of consent, violence, and sexual activity. The results support the preparation hypothesis: Men showed the greatest genital arousal in response to narratives depicting consensual, nonviolent sex, whereas women showed similar responses to all the narratives involving sexual activities, including those describing a sexual assault.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21189352     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610394660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  16 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of female sexual arousal in forensic populations.

Authors:  Natasha M Knack; Lisa Murphy; Rebekah Ranger; Cindy Meston; J Paul Fedoroff
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Assessing Paraphilic Interests Among Women Who Sexually Offend.

Authors:  Katrina N Bouchard; Heather M Moulden; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Prepared for Pleasure? An Alternative Perspective on the Preparation Hypothesis.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-09

4.  Four Additional Questions for the Preparation Hypothesis.

Authors:  Kirstin Clephane; Anneliis Sartin-Tarm; Tierney K Lorenz
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-07-18

Review 5.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

6.  Use of the Bogus Pipeline Increases Sexual Concordance in Women But Not Men.

Authors:  Kelly D Suschinsky; Terri D Fisher; Larah Maunder; Tom Hollenstein; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-06-05

7.  Straight but Not Narrow; Within-Gender Variation in the Gender-Specificity of Women's Sexual Response.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Katrina N Bouchard; Amanda D Timmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can the Vaginal Photoplethysmograph and Its Associated Methodology Be Used to Assess Anal Vasocongestion in Women and Men?

Authors:  Megan L Sawatsky; Kelly D Suschinsky; Sofija Lavrinsek; Meredith L Chivers; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  More Research on Context and Moderators Is Needed to Understand Reflexive Vaginal Arousal Responses.

Authors:  Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Julia G Kaufmann
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

10.  Development and validation of the Male Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (MRMAS).

Authors:  Benjamin A Hine; Anthony D Murphy; Jamie S Churchyard
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.