Literature DB >> 10068081

Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer management.

C K Osborne1.   

Abstract

Estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) have now been studied in clinical breast cancer for more than 20 years. Positive receptor status correlates with favorable prognostic features including a lower rate of cell proliferation and histologic evidence of tumor differentiation. During the first several years after diagnosis, patients with ER-positive tumors tend to have a lower recurrence rate; however, this is balanced by a higher recurrence rate in subsequent years so that the overall prognostic significance of receptor status is modest. ER and PR have their greatest utility in predicting response to hormonal therapy, both in the adjuvant setting and for advanced disease. When the assay is done properly and cut-offs for ER-negativity and positivity are defined by clinical studies of patients treated with endocrine therapy, receptor status is very helpful in identifying groups of patients who are very unlikely to benefit from hormonal therapy. Tumors that express both ER and PR have the greatest benefit from hormonal therapy, but those containing only ER or only PR still have significant responses. Two types of estrogen receptors, ERalpha and ERbeta, have now been identified. Although there is considerable homology between these receptor forms, they appear to have important structural and functional differences that may be important for tissue and promoter-specific regulation of gene expression. These receptor forms, as well as ER variants and mutants, may also contribute to hormonal sensitivity and resistance. PR also exists in two forms, PRA and PRB. PRA appears to have repressor functions on both PRB and ERalpha, and the ratio of PRA to PRB in clinical breast tumors needs to be studied for its possible clinical relevance. Expression of receptor-interacting proteins can also modulate ER transcriptional activity, and these too need additional study to determine if they are markers of hormonal sensitivity or resistance. In summary, ER and PR status are important biomarkers that help physicians individualize therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10068081     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006132427948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  114 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Organoruthenium(II) Complexes Bearing an Aromatase Inhibitor: Synthesis, Characterization, in Vitro Biological Activity and in Vivo Toxicity in Zebrafish Embryos.

Authors:  Golara Golbaghi; Mohammad Mehdi Haghdoost; Debbie Yancu; Yossef López de Los Santos; Nicolas Doucet; Shunmoogum A Patten; J Thomas Sanderson; Annie Castonguay
Journal:  Organometallics       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  Systems approaches to molecular cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Shuyi Ma; Cory C Funk; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.970

4.  A lipid-modified estrogen derivative that treats breast cancer independent of estrogen receptor expression through simultaneous induction of autophagy and apoptosis.

Authors:  Sutapa Sinha; Sayantani Roy; Bathula Surendar Reddy; Krishnendu Pal; Godeshala Sudhakar; Seethalakshmi Iyer; Shamit Dutta; Enfeng Wang; Pawan Kumar Vohra; Karnati Rammohan Roy; Pallu Reddanna; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Rajkumar Banerjee
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  The role of circadian rhythm in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shujing Li; Xiang Ao; Huijian Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Anti-Tumoral Activity of a Short Decapeptide Fragment of the Alzheimer's Abeta Peptide.

Authors:  Daniel Paris; Nikunj Patel; Nowell J Ganey; Vincent Laporte; Amita Quadros; Michael J Mullan
Journal:  Int J Pept Res Ther       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  Estrogen Receptor β Mediated Neuroprotective Efficacy of Cicer microphyllum Seed Extract in Global Hypoxia.

Authors:  Deepti Sharma; Surya Narayan Biswal; Kushal Kumar; Pushpendar Bhardwaj; Kalpana Kumari Barhwal; Ashish Kumar; Sunil Kumar Hota; Om Prakash Chaurasia
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 8.  Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer: Evolving Paradigms in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rossi; Olivia Pagani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

9.  HspBP1 levels are elevated in breast tumor tissue and inversely related to tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Ana Paula Souza; Caroline Albuquerque; Carolina Torronteguy; Antonio Frasson; Fabio Maito; Luciana Pereira; Vinícius Duval da Silva; Felipe Zerwes; Deborah Raynes; Vince Guerriero; Cristina Bonorino
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.667

10.  A kinetic model identifies phosphorylated estrogen receptor-α (ERα) as a critical regulator of ERα dynamics in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dan Tian; Natalia M Solodin; Prashant Rajbhandari; Kelsi Bjorklund; Elaine T Alarid; Pamela K Kreeger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.