Literature DB >> 21188284

Classifying Facial Actions.

Gianluca Donato1, Marian Stewart Bartlett, Joseph C Hager, Paul Ekman, Terrence J Sejnowski.   

Abstract

The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) [23] is an objective method for quantifying facial movement in terms of component actions. This system is widely used in behavioral investigations of emotion, cognitive processes, and social interaction. The coding is presently performed by highly trained human experts. This paper explores and compares techniques for automatically recognizing facial actions in sequences of images. These techniques include analysis of facial motion through estimation of optical flow; holistic spatial analysis, such as principal component analysis, independent component analysis, local feature analysis, and linear discriminant analysis; and methods based on the outputs of local filters, such as Gabor wavelet representations and local principal components. Performance of these systems is compared to naive and expert human subjects. Best performances were obtained using the Gabor wavelet representation and the independent component representation, both of which achieved 96 percent accuracy for classifying 12 facial actions of the upper and lower face. The results provide converging evidence for the importance of using local filters, high spatial frequencies, and statistical independence for classifying facial actions.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 21188284      PMCID: PMC3008166          DOI: 10.1109/34.799905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell        ISSN: 0098-5589            Impact factor:   6.226


  13 in total

1.  Measuring facial expressions by computer image analysis.

Authors:  M S Bartlett; J C Hager; P Ekman; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Automated face analysis by feature point tracking has high concurrent validity with manual FACS coding.

Authors:  J F Cohn; A J Zlochower; J Lien; T Kanade
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Genuine, suppressed and faked facial behavior during exacerbation of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Kenneth D Craig; Susan A Hyde; Christopher J Patrick
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust.

Authors:  M L Phillips; A W Young; C Senior; M Brammer; C Andrew; A J Calder; E T Bullmore; D I Perrett; D Rowland; S C Williams; J A Gray; A S David
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  J P Jones; L A Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Emotional expression in upside-down faces: evidence for configurational and componential processing.

Authors:  S J McKelvie
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-09

8.  Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex.

Authors:  D A Pollen; S F Ronner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Human expression recognition from motion using a radial basis function network architecture.

Authors:  M Rosenblum; Y Yacoob; L S Davis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1996
View more
  21 in total

1.  Robust Full-Motion Recovery of Head by Dynamic Templates and Re-registration Techniques.

Authors:  Jing Xiao; Tsuyoshi Moriyama; Takeo Kanade; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  Int J Imaging Syst Technol       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Computerized measurement of facial expression of emotions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christopher Alvino; Christian Kohler; Frederick Barrett; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Ragini Verma
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Neural portraits of perception: reconstructing face images from evoked brain activity.

Authors:  Alan S Cowen; Marvin M Chun; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Automatic detection of pain intensity.

Authors:  Zakia Hammal; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  Proc ACM Int Conf Multimodal Interact       Date:  2012-10

5.  Recognizing Action Units for Facial Expression Analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Li Tian; Takeo Kanade; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Training facial expression production in children on the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Iris Gordon; Matthew D Pierce; Marian S Bartlett; James W Tanaka
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-10

7.  Improving Pain Recognition Through Better Utilisation of Temporal Information.

Authors:  Patrick Lucey; Jessica Howlett; Jeff Cohn; Simon Lucey; Sridha Sridharan; Zara Ambadar
Journal:  Int Conf Audit Vis Speech Process       Date:  2008

8.  Face recognition by independent component analysis.

Authors:  M S Bartlett; J R Movellan; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2002

9.  Objective, computerized video-based rating of blepharospasm severity.

Authors:  David A Peterson; Gwen C Littlewort; Marian S Bartlett; Antonella Macerollo; Joel S Perlmutter; H A Jinnah; Mark Hallett; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  A Gabor-block-based kernel discriminative common vector approach using cosine kernels for human face recognition.

Authors:  Arindam Kar; Debotosh Bhattacharjee; Dipak Kumar Basu; Mita Nasipuri; Mahantapas Kundu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.