Literature DB >> 21188086

Circadian variation on the onset of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in diabetic subjects.

Jing Li1, Qi Hua, Lin Pi, Jing Tan, Boyu Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND#ENTITYSTARTX02014;: Previous studies have shown that there is a circadian variation in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction. The aim of this study is to examine the circadian rhythms of acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS#ENTITYSTARTX02014;: 1016 consecutive patients admitted to a coronary care unit with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction were studied from January 2004 to December 2008. All patients were divided into two groups according to with or without diabetes. Admission rates were calculated according to the 6-hour interval of the day (circadian rhythm). The data were analyzed for variations within subgroups. In diabetic group, number of patients in the first to fourth quarters was 38, 45, 43, 46 respectively (NS). The corresponding figures for the controls were 174, 295, 183, 192 (P<0.01). The difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.02). CONCLUSION#ENTITYSTARTX02014;: There is no a significant circadian variation in the onset of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circadian variation; diabetes; myocardial infarction

Year:  2010        PMID: 21188086      PMCID: PMC3004166          DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.59981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res        ISSN: 0975-3583


INTRODUCTION

Circadian variation of the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been reported by some studies and may carry important pathophysiologic implications. Some studies show an increased onset in the morning between 6:00 AM and 12:00 noon. Furthermore, a secondary peak in the late evening has also been reported in some studies.1 Diabetes neuropathy occurs in approximately 16~50% of individuals with long-standing type 1 and type 2 diabetes. It may manifest as polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy2 and/ or autonomic neuropathy. Diabetic neuropathy may lead to loss of the normal circadian pattern of autonomic nervous system activity3, and altered normal circadian variation in some physiological process.4 Zarich et al report that time of onset of ischemia in diabetic patients follows a circadian distribution, with a peak incidence in the morning hours, suggesting that alterations in sympathovagal balance may have an effect on the circadian pattern of cardiovascular events.5 However, there are conflicting reports regarding circadian variation on the onset of AMI among patients with diabetes. To determine whether diabetes has an impact on the circadian variation of AMI onset, we investigate the circadian pattern in diabetic patients and compare with the controls.

Study Population

Consecutive patients admitted to the cardiac care unit (CCU) of Xuanwu hospital with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between January 2004 and December 2008 were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were: age greater than or equal to 18 and diagnosis of STEMI. STEMI was diagnosed if two of the following criteria were present: (1) the presence of ischemic pain or other symptoms lasting ≥30 minutes; (2) ST-segment elevation of ≥ 2 mm in at least 2 contiguous precordial leads, ST-segment elevation of ≥1mm in at least 2 inferior leads (II, III, or aVF), or new left bundlebranch block; (3) an increase in serum MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase(CKMB) to more than twice the upper limit of normal. Exclusion criteria: (1) myocardial infarction occurring after invasive coronary artery procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG ; (2) history of myocardial infarction; (3) causes of myocardial infarction without coronary atherosclerosis. All subjects were assigned into two groups according to with or without diabetes. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was based on history of treatment with hypoglycemic agents and/or fasting blood glucose >126 mg/dl. We divided the day in into four 6-h intervals from 0:00 to 5:59, 6:00 to 11:59, 12:00 to 17:59, and 18:00 to 23:59 and calculated number of patients in each interval.

Data collection

For each patient enrolled, the structured data form was completed by experienced cardiologists within 72 hours after admission. Clinical features were obtained from coronary care unit admission logs and other medical documentation, including: (1) baseline data: age, gender, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, smoking, history of disease (diabetes, hypertension, cerebral vascular disease). Duration from onset to emergency room was calculated. (2) laboratory examination: white cell count (WBC), total cholestrol, peak of MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase, serum potassium, blood glucose, serum creatinine (CRE). Fasting blood samples for laboratory measurements were obtained early in the morning after overnight fasting within 24h of admission. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured by ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) within 24 hours of admission. (3) Clinical outcome: Killip Class, in-hospital mortality.

Statistical analysis

The hypothesis that the number of diabetes patients with infarction during each time interval was equal to an expected frequency was tested using a χ2 goodness of fit analysis. The χ2 test was used to assess the significance of circadian variation between the two groups.

RESULTS

1. Baseline characteristics

Among 1016 subjects enrolled in this study, 172 were diagnosed as diabetes. Compared with the control group, diabetes patients were elder and more female. There was no significant difference on level of serum creatinine and left ventricular ejection fraction between two groups. Diabetes patients had more comorbidities and worse in-hospital outcome. Proportion of patients taking β adrenergic receptor blockers before onset of MI was similar between two groups (table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients between two groups

Diabetes groupControl groupP value
N172(16.9%)844(83.1%)
Age(year)65.3±10.562.4±12.40.001
Men(%)105(61.0)632(74.9)<0.001
Women (%)67(39.0)212(25.1)<0.001
Time(h)5.05.00.756
Heart rate (bpm)84.2±20.777.9±17.5<0.001
Systolic pressure(mmHg)133.6±28.9132.8±44.60.833
Diastolic pressure(mmHg)80.4±17.080.6±16.50.419
Killip Class(%)0.006
 I82(48.0)512(62.2)
 II59(34.5)225(26.8)
 III17(9.9)62(7.4)
 IV13(7.6)29(3.5)
WBC(G/L)10.6±3.810.9±5.80.801
Peak of CKMB(IU/L)121.0144.00.041
Cholesterol(mg/dl)191.4±47.8186.6±44.70.222
Serum creatinine(mg/dl)1.3±0.51.2±0.90.123
Serum potassium (mmol/L)4.3±0.74.1±1.50.688
Ejection fraction(%)55.9±11.056.0±10.60.936
Hypertension(%)111(64.5%)367(43.5%)<0.001
Smoker(%)49(28.5%)448(53.1%)<0.001
Cerebral vascular disease39(22.8%)88(10.6%)0.001
Death(%)32(18.6%)57(6.7%)<0.001
Prior β blocker29(17.0%)34(19.6%)0.0

Data are presented as means±SD, median or cases(percentages) of patient. WBC, white blood corpuscle; CKMB, MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients between two groups Data are presented as means±SD, median or cases(percentages) of patient. WBC, white blood corpuscle; CKMB, MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase

2. Circadian variation

The 6-h interval of AMI onset was shown in Table 2. There was no circadian variation in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic subjects. The circadian variation was significant in the controls (P<0.01). The peak incidence occurred in the second quarter (6 am to 12 noon), this was statistically higher than the average incidence in the remainder of the day (P<0.01). The difference between the circadian pattern of diabetic patients and controls was highly statistically significant (P<0.02).
Table 2

distribution of 6-hour interval

0:00~5:596:00~11:5912:00~17:5918:00~23:59
diabetes group38(22.2%)45(26.1%)43(24.9%)46(26.8%)
control group174(20.6%)295(34.9%)183(21.7%)192(22.8%)

Data are presented as case s(percentages) of patient

distribution of 6-hour interval Data are presented as case s(percentages) of patient

DISCUSSION

Circadian variation has been demonstrated in several types of acute cardiovascular disease, including acute myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, silent ambulatory ischemia, and thrombotic stroke. The morning peak of incidence of AMI is related to some known daily rhythms. It is well known that a surge in sympathetic activity and vagal withdrawal occurs after waking accompanying by increase of plasma levels of catecholamine, renin and cortisol (morning peak approximately 6:00 AM, decreasing but still high until noon). As a result, higher level of heart rate, blood pressure, coronary vascular tone, platelet aggregability and a lower level of fibrinolytic activity are observed during the early morning hours. These changes may increase shear forces in the coronary arterial bed, thus promoting plaque disruption and causing unstable angina and AMI. Also, a morning increase in platelet reactivity may make a thrombus more likely to grow and cause symptoms. A study6 including 4,796 patients firstly showed that circadian variation of the onset of acute myocardial infarction altered with specific clinical characteristics such as diabetes, smoking, heart failure, non Q wave infarction, taking beta-blocking drugs. Some study had confirmed this finding,7 but other study showed conflicting reports. They failed to demonstrate such a variation in the circadian pattern in the onset of AMI[8] among patients with diabetes. Our study showed there was no a significant morning peak in patients with diabetes but was obvious in control group (6 am to 12 noon). The mechanism of change of circadian pattern in the onset of AMI among diabetic subjects is unclear. It can be related to the blunting of diurnal variation in physiological variables. Autonomic nervous system plays an important role in determining the circadian pattern of cardiovascular events. It suggests that in patients with diabetes, abnormalities in the circadian rhythm of autonomic tone may be responsible for the altered temporal onset of cardiovascular events.9~12 One study13 found that 25.3% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 34.3% of patients with type 2 diabetes had abnormal findings in more than two of six autonomic function tests. Another study observed prevalence rate of autonomic neuropathy for individuals with type 1 diabetes was 16.6%.14 As a result of autonomic neuropathy, the rhythm of sympathovagal balance is significantly attenuated in patients with diabetes compared with those without diabetes. The morning rise in platelet aggregability has been reported to be lost in diabetic patients by some investigators. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and von Willebrand factor show no circadian variation in patients with diabetes.15 Diabetic subjects also show diminished circadian variation in blood pressure.16 Yamamoto reported patients with diabetes and symptomatic autonomic neuropathy had markedly impaired heart rate variability.17 However, there were also conflicted reports. Behar showed the preponderance of the morning peak persisted in patients with diabetes mellitus.18 Jamal reported circadian morning peak of AMI symptom onset existed in patient with history of type 2 diabetes less than 5 years, but it was attenuated in patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes for 5 or more years.19 In this study, we demonstrated disappear of morning peak of onset of AMI was not associated with duration of diabetes. In fact, while autonomic dysfunction is an established complication of diabetes and clinical symptoms of autonomic neuropathy generally do not occur until long after the onset of diabetes, but impaired autonomic function is often detected at the time of diabetes diagnosis. Subclinical autonomic dysfunction can, however, occur within a year of diagnosis in type 2 diabetes patients and within two years in type 1 diabetes patients. This suggests that autonomic dysfunction may be present after a relatively brief exposure to hyperglycemia or perhaps even in the clinically normal range of glucose.20–21 Data in our study which indicates that resting heart rate of diabetic subjects is higher than non diabetics, maybe support this opinion indirectly, because resting tachycardia is a marker of autonomic dysfunction. The lack of circadian variation in the onset of acute myocardial infarction may have therapeutic implications. As cardio-protective medication has been shown to exert its effect mainly by diminishing the morning peak in acute myocardial infarction, the optimal timing of such medication may differ in diabetic subjects from their non-diabetic counterparts.22
  22 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

Authors:  Aaron I Vinik; Raelene E Maser; Braxton D Mitchell; Roy Freeman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Altered circadian rhythm of pulp sensibility in elderly diabetic and hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Bin Guo; Si-jing Xie; Ke-hua Que; Fan Yang; Jing Liu; Zheng-rong Wang; Xue-dong Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Impaired diurnal cardiac autonomic function in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; Y Yamasaki; M Kodama; M Matsuhisa; M Kishimoto; H Ozaki; A Tani; N Ueda; M Iwasaki; M Hori
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Factors determining the 24-h blood pressure profile in normotensive patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  V Spallone; M R Maiello; E Cicconetti; A Pannone; A Barini; S Gambardella; G Menzinger
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  The epidemiology of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetic Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy Multicenter Study Group.

Authors:  D Ziegler; F A Gries; M Spüler; F Lessmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.852

6.  Influence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction on the development of type 2 diabetes: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Mercedes R Carnethon; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; Kiang Liu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Circadian variation and possible external triggers of onset of myocardial infarction. SPRINT Study Group.

Authors:  S Behar; M Halabi; H Reicher-Reiss; M Zion; E Kaplinsky; L Mandelzweig; U Goldbourt
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Value of sympathetic skin response test in the early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Yi-ning Huang; Zhi-rong Jia; Xin Shi; Xiang-ru Sun
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Modification of the circadian variation of symptom onset of acute myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  T Tanaka; M Fujita; T Fudo; S Tamaki; R Nohara; S Sasayama
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.439

10.  Absence of circadian variation in the onset of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic subjects.

Authors:  S Fava; J Azzopardi; H A Muscat; F F Fenech
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors for silent myocardial ischemia in patients with well-controlled essential hypertension.

Authors:  Domenico Rendina; Renato Ippolito; Gianpaolo De Filippo; Riccardo Muscariello; Daniela De Palma; Silvana De Bonis; Michele Schiano di Cola; Domenico Benvenuto; Maurizio Galderisi; Pasquale Strazzullo; Ferruccio Galletti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.397

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.