Literature DB >> 21187569

Flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS): technique and results.

José Ramón Cansino Alcaide1, Javier Reinoso Elbers, David López Sánchez, Sonia Pérez González, Alfredo Aguilera Bazán, Alberto Rando Tous, Luís Hidalgo Togores, Javier De La Peña Barthel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper has two main objectives: First, to expose the URS technique used in our Department because there are important differences with respect to others centres published, explaining same aspect that can benefit to the better development of the technique. Second, we present the results of a series of 100 cases. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (Flex URS) has been little used to date, mainly because of the technical difficulties created by the deficient quality of the instruments used, such as ureteroscopes offering scant visibility, poor illumination, a small working channel, deficient quality of the forceps and baskets, etc.
METHODS: We present our recent series of flexible URS for the treatment of renal lithiasis. We performes a retrospective analysis of this treatment corresponding to the period between January 2007 and March 2010. In this period we have treated 100 patients. The medium size of the stone treated is 1.5cm (0.5-6cm) and we used ureteroscopic protector sheath in all cases. The lithotripter system used in all cases was Ho:YAG Laser with 200 and 365 micras fibers
RESULTS: The stone-free rate (SFR) in the immediate postoperative period was 77% (77/100 patients). Residual stones, defined as stone fragments visualized in the operating room via fluoroscopy and directly with the flexible ureteroscope. Three months after surgery, the SFR was 92.7% (89/96 patients) confirmed by intravenous urography. Regarding complications, we had 5 patients with ureteral lesions during protector sheath pass and 9 patients that presented at the emergency room with pain secondary to the double J catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: Flexible URS for of renal lithiasis can be defended in stones measuring up to 2 cm in diameter, based on our treatment algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21187569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Esp Urol        ISSN: 0004-0614            Impact factor:   0.436


  9 in total

1.  Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.

Authors:  Susanne Deininger; Luis Haberstock; Stephan Kruck; Eva Neumann; Ines Anselmo da Costa; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Steffen Rausch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation.

Authors:  Ural Oğuz; Melih Balci; Gokhan Atis; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Altug Tuncel; Fikret Halis; Yilmaz Aslan; Ismail Okan Yildirim; Cagri Senocak; Mustafa Yordam; Ali Atan; Turhan Caskurlu; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones?

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; J Stuart Wolf; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Sheathless and fluoroscopy-free retrograde intrarenal surgery: An attractive way of renal stone management in high-volume stone centers.

Authors:  Sarwar Noori Mahmood; Hewa Toffeq; Saman Fakhralddin
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-07-16

5.  Factors associated with postoperative pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones.

Authors:  Ural Oğuz; Tolga Şahin; Çağrı Şenocak; Ekrem Özyuvalı; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Berkan Reşorlu; Ali Ünsal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

6.  A comparison of efficacies of holmium YAG laser, and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ekrem Akdeniz; Lokman İrkılata; Hüseyin Cihan Demirel; Acun Saylık; Mustafa Suat Bolat; Necmettin Şahinkaya; Mehmet Zengin; Mustafa Kemal Atilla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

7.  Small renal pelvis stones: Shock wave lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy? A match-pair analysis.

Authors:  Zafer Gökhan Gürbüz; Nevzat Can Şener; Ediz Vuruşkan; Mehmet Eflatun Deniz; Güçlü Gürlen; Ferhat Ortoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-09-04

8.  External validation of the T.O.HO. score as predictor of success after retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Samet Senel; Yusuf Kasap; Yalcin Kizilkan; Sedat Tastemur; Cuneyt Ozden
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 2.090

9.  Evaluation of mini-PCNL and RIRS for renal stones 1-2 cm in an economically challenged setting: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sarwar Noori Mahmood; Choman J Ahmed; Hewa Tawfeeq; Rawa Bapir; Saman Salih Fakhralddin; Berwn A Abdulla; Renato N Pedro; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.