| Literature DB >> 21184200 |
Lia H Campbell1, Kelvin G M Brockbank.
Abstract
There are many compounds that can and have been used as cryoprotectants including disaccharides such as trehalose. Many organisms in nature use trehalose to help protect themselves at colder temperatures. Trehalose has also been used to a limited extent for the preservation of mammalian cells and tissues, but mainly as a supplement to other cryoprotectants like dimethyl sulfoxide. Recently, the use of trehalose as the primary cryoprotectant has gained much interest because of its low-potential cytotoxicity. Trehalose does not readily pass through mammalian cells membranes and research has shown that it is most effective when present on both sides of the cell membrane prior to preservation. Different strategies for introducing disaccharide sugars into cells have been investigated with limited success. In this study, two separate strategies are investigated for the introduction of disaccharide sugars into cells. Electroporation using an electric pulse to create temporary holes in the membrane so that molecules could pass through and a transport peptide (Chariot™) that covalently binds to the molecule of interest and then moves it across the membrane. Both strategies have the potential to load disaccharide sugars into cells at concentrations that would provide ample protection during preservation. In preparation for cryopreservation studies, smooth muscle cells that are difficult to cryopreserve using conventional preservation protocols were used to evaluate and compare the translocation potential of these two strategies using β-galactosidase. Assessment of each loading strategy was done by measuring viability and the presence of β-galactosidase inside the cells. The results indicate that both methods appear feasible as potential delivery systems and that treatment cytotoxicity can be minimized. The next step is definition of the best loading strategy to introduce trehalose into cells followed by preservation by freezing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21184200 PMCID: PMC7565924 DOI: 10.1007/s11626-010-9379-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim ISSN: 1071-2690 Impact factor: 2.416