Literature DB >> 21184176

Survival of White Ibises (Eudocimus albus) in response to chronic experimental methylmercury exposure.

Peter Frederick1, Ashley Campbell, Nilmini Jayasena, Rena Borkhataria.   

Abstract

Although methylated mercury (MeHg) is known to have neurological, immunological, reproductive, and endocrine effects on vertebrates at low environmental exposure levels, effects on survival of exposed birds have not been demonstrated in the wild. Here, we report on survival of the same group of White Ibises (Eudocimus albus) during exposure to 4 levels of dietary MeHg in captivity and later as depurated free-ranging animals. Ibises were chronically exposed in captivity to dietary MeHg in groups at 0 (control), 0.05 (Low), 0.1 (Medium) and 0.3 (High) ppm MeHg ww for 43 months. No differences in annualized survival among captive MeHg groups were seen within age classes. Survival of all ages taken together was significantly lower for Control birds than for Low or Medium dosed birds, but was not different from High dosed birds. While this might be evidence of a hormetic effect, none of the captive results support the prediction that MeHg impairs survival. Using a mark-recapture analysis we found no effects of dose group or of Hg exposure on survival or resight probabilities during the first 99 days post-release to the wild. The latter results suggest that there is no lasting, post-depuration effect of even high MeHg exposure (0.3 ppm ww dietary) on survival. While these results agree with a variety of studies of survival of free-ranging birds, we suggest many survival studies have been confounded by seasonal depuration through molt, and variation in exposure rates. We suggest future studies concentrate on evaluating survival effects during nonmolting periods in species for which methylmercury exposure is relatively constant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184176     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0586-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  19 in total

1.  Altered pairing behaviour and reproductive success in white ibises exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of methylmercury.

Authors:  Peter Frederick; Nilmini Jayasena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Enhanced reproduction in mallards fed a low level of methylmercury: an apparent case of hormesis.

Authors:  Gary H Heinz; David J Hoffman; Jon D Klimstra; Katherine R Stebbins
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Survival of postfledging Forster's terns in relation to mercury exposure in San Francisco Bay.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; John Y Takekawa; Samuel A Iverson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 4.  The endocrine effects of mercury in humans and wildlife.

Authors:  Shirlee W Tan; Jesse C Meiller; Kathryn R Mahaffey
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Mercury contamination and effects on survival of American avocet and black-necked stilt chicks in San Francisco Bay.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; John Y Takekawa; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Samuel A Iverson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs.

Authors:  Daniel A Cristol; Rebecka L Brasso; Anne M Condon; Rachel E Fovargue; Scott L Friedman; Kelly K Hallinger; Adrian P Monroe; Ariel E White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The chronic toxicity of aluminium, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review.

Authors:  A M Scheuhammer
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 8.  Mercury-induced reproductive impairment in fish.

Authors:  Kate L Crump; Vance L Trudeau
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons.

Authors:  David C Evers; Lucas J Savoy; Christopher R DeSorbo; David E Yates; William Hanson; Kate M Taylor; Lori S Siegel; John H Cooley; Michael S Bank; Andrew Major; Kenneth Munney; Barry F Mower; Harry S Vogel; Nina Schoch; Mark Pokras; Morgan W Goodale; Jeff Fair
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Mercury and monomethylmercury: present and future concerns.

Authors:  W F Fitzgerald; T W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Projecting changes in Everglades soil biogeochemistry for carbon and other key elements, to possible 2060 climate and hydrologic scenarios.

Authors:  William Orem; Susan Newman; Todd Z Osborne; K Ramesh Reddy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Mercury bioaccumulation in Southern Appalachian birds, assessed through feather concentrations.

Authors:  Rebecca Hylton Keller; Lingtian Xie; David B Buchwalter; Kathleen E Franzreb; Theodore R Simons
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.823

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.