Literature DB >> 18563558

Survival of postfledging Forster's terns in relation to mercury exposure in San Francisco Bay.

Joshua T Ackerman1, Collin A Eagles-Smith, John Y Takekawa, Samuel A Iverson.   

Abstract

We examined factors influencing mercury concentrations in 90 fledgling Forster's terns (Sterna forsteri) and evaluated whether mercury influenced postfledging survival in San Francisco Bay, California. Mercury concentrations (+/- SE) in chicks 21-29 days old (just before fledging) were 0.33 +/- 0.01 microg g(-1) ww for blood and 6.44 +/- 0.28 microg g(-1) fw for breast feathers. Colony site had an overriding influence on fledgling contamination, however hatching date and age also affected blood, but not feather, mercury concentrations. Blood mercury concentrations decreased by 28% during the 50-day hatching period and increased with chick age by 30% during the last week prior to fledging. Using radio-telemetry, we calculated that cumulative survival during the 35-day postfledging time period was 0.81 +/- 0.09 (SE). Postfledging survival rates increased with size-adjusted mass, and cumulative survival probability was 61% lower for terns with the lowest, compared to the highest, observed masses. Conversely, survival was not influenced by blood mercury concentration, time since fledging, sex, or hatch date. Mercury concentrations in breast feathers of fledglings found dead at nesting colonies also were no different than those in live chicks. Our results indicate that colony site, hatching date, and age influenced mercury concentrations in fledgling Forster's terns, but that mercury did not influence postfledging survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563558     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0237-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  24 in total

1.  Mercury concentrations in blood and feathers of prebreeding Forster's terns in relation to space use of San Francisco Bay, California, USA, habitats.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; John Y Takekawa; Jill D Bluso; Terrence L Adelsbach
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Effects of low dietary levels of methyl mercury on mallard reproduction.

Authors:  G Heinz
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Mercury and growth of tree swallows at Acadia National Park, and at Orono, Maine, USA.

Authors:  Jerry R Longcore; Reza Dineli; Terry A Haines
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Risk, mercury levels, and birds: relating adverse laboratory effects to field biomonitoring.

Authors:  J Burger; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Mercury contamination and effects on survival of American avocet and black-necked stilt chicks in San Francisco Bay.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; John Y Takekawa; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Samuel A Iverson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Mercury concentrations and space use of pre-breeding American avocets and black-necked stilts in San Francisco Bay.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; John Y Takekawa; Scott A Demers; Terrence L Adelsbach; Jill D Bluso; A Keith Miles; Nils Warnock; Thomas H Suchanek; Steven E Schwarzbach
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Effects of methylmercury exposure on the immune function of juvenile common loons (Gavia immer).

Authors:  Kevin P Kenow; Keith A Grasman; Randy K Hines; Michael W Meyer; Annette Gendron-Fitzpatrick; Marilyn G Spalding; Brian R Gray
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Mercury in seabird feathers: insight on dietary habits and evidence for exposure levels in the western Indian Ocean.

Authors:  Jessica Kojadinovic; Paco Bustamante; Carine Churlaud; Richard P Cosson; Matthieu Le Corre
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Effects of methylmercury on reproduction in American kestrels.

Authors:  Peter H Albers; Michael T Koterba; Ronald Rossmann; William A Link; John B French; Richard S Bennett; Wayne C Bauer
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Bioenergetic and pharmacokinetic model for exposure of common loon (Gavia immer) chicks to methylmercury.

Authors:  William H Karasov; Kevin P Kenow; Michael W Meyer; Francois Fournier
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  5 in total

1.  Survival of White Ibises (Eudocimus albus) in response to chronic experimental methylmercury exposure.

Authors:  Peter Frederick; Ashley Campbell; Nilmini Jayasena; Rena Borkhataria
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury exposure and survival in free-living tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor).

Authors:  Kelly K Hallinger; Kerri L Cornell; Rebecka L Brasso; Daniel A Cristol
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Reducing methylmercury accumulation in the food webs of San Francisco Bay and its local watersheds.

Authors:  J A Davis; R E Looker; D Yee; M Marvin-Di Pasquale; J L Grenier; C M Austin; L J McKee; B K Greenfield; R Brodberg; J D Blum
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Unintended consequences of management actions in salt pond restoration: cascading effects in trophic interactions.

Authors:  John Y Takekawa; Joshua T Ackerman; L Arriana Brand; Tanya R Graham; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Mark P Herzog; Brent R Topping; Gregory G Shellenbarger; James S Kuwabara; Eric Mruz; Sara L Piotter; Nicole D Athearn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Wide range of mercury contamination in chicks of southern ocean seabirds.

Authors:  Pierre Blévin; Alice Carravieri; Audrey Jaeger; Olivier Chastel; Paco Bustamante; Yves Cherel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.