Literature DB >> 32944749

Use of vasopressors during esophagectomy is not associated with increased risk of anastomotic leak.

Kevin J Walsh1,2, Hao Zhang1,2, Kay See Tan3, Alessia Pedoto1,2, Dawn P Desiderio1,2, Gregory W Fischer1,2, Manjit S Bains4, David R Jones4, Daniela Molena4, David Amar1,2.   

Abstract

Vasopressor use during esophagectomy has been reported to increase the risk of postoperative anastomotic leak and associated morbidity. We sought to assess the association between vasopressor use and fluid (crystalloid and colloid) administration and anastomotic leak following open esophagectomy. Patients who underwent open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were identified from a prospective institutional database. The primary outcome was postoperative anastomotic leak (any grade) and analyzed using logistic regression models. Postoperative anastomotic leak developed in 52 of 327 consecutive patients (16%) and was not significantly associated with vasopressor use or fluid administered in either univariable or multivariable analyses. Increasing body mass index was the only significant characteristic of both univariable (P = 0.004) and multivariable analyses associated with anastomotic leak (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.09; P = 0.007). Of the 52 patients that developed an anastomotic leak, 12 (23%) were grade 1, 21 (40%) were grade 2 and 19 (37%) were grade 3. In our cohort, only body mass index, and not intraoperative vasopressor use and fluid administration, was significantly associated with increased odds of postoperative anastomotic leak following open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; esophagogastrectomy; norepinephrine; phenylephrine; thoracic surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 32944749      PMCID: PMC8024447          DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  30 in total

Review 1.  Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Deng; Quan-Xing Liu; Dong Zhou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Martin Rutegård; Pernilla Lagergren; Ioannis Rouvelas; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.

Authors:  Ashish Khanna; Shane W English; Xueyuan S Wang; Kealy Ham; James Tumlin; Harold Szerlip; Laurence W Busse; Laith Altaweel; Timothy E Albertson; Caleb Mackey; Michael T McCurdy; David W Boldt; Stefan Chock; Paul J Young; Kenneth Krell; Richard G Wunderink; Marlies Ostermann; Raghavan Murugan; Michelle N Gong; Rakshit Panwar; Johanna Hästbacka; Raphael Favory; Balasubramanian Venkatesh; B Taylor Thompson; Rinaldo Bellomo; Jeffrey Jensen; Stew Kroll; Lakhmir S Chawla; George F Tidmarsh; Adam M Deane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Conduit Vascular Evaluation is Associated with Reduction in Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Chase Campbell; Mark K Reames; Myra Robinson; James Symanowski; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Phenylephrine infusion improves blood flow to the stomach during oesophagectomy in the presence of a thoracic epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Darshan Pathak; Stephen H Pennefather; Glenn N Russell; Omar Al Rawi; I C Dave; Susan Gilby; Richard D Page
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 6.  Perioperative fluid management for pulmonary resection surgery and esophagectomy.

Authors:  Edmond Hung Leong Chau; Peter Slinger
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-05-29

7.  Prediction of major postoperative complications and survival for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Somkiat Sunpaweravong; Sakchai Ruangsin; Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol; Somrit Mahattanobon; Alan Geater
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.767

8.  Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

9.  The effects of vasopressors on perfusion of gastric graft after esophagectomy. An experimental study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Theodorou; Panagiotis G Drimousis; Andreas Larentzakis; Apostolos Papalois; Konstantinos G Toutouzas; Stylianos Katsaragakis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Shobhit Arya; Alan Karthikesalingam; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint.

Authors:  Cristian Deana; Luigi Vetrugno; Elena Bignami; Flavio Bassi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jieping Yang; Xukeng Guo; Zonggui Zheng; Weiqi Ke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.376

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.