Literature DB >> 21183646

Accessing the soil metagenome for studies of microbial diversity.

Tom O Delmont1, Patrick Robe, Sébastien Cecillon, Ian M Clark, Florentin Constancias, Pascal Simonet, Penny R Hirsch, Timothy M Vogel.   

Abstract

Soil microbial communities contain the highest level of prokaryotic diversity of any environment, and metagenomic approaches involving the extraction of DNA from soil can improve our access to these communities. Most analyses of soil biodiversity and function assume that the DNA extracted represents the microbial community in the soil, but subsequent interpretations are limited by the DNA recovered from the soil. Unfortunately, extraction methods do not provide a uniform and unbiased subsample of metagenomic DNA, and as a consequence, accurate species distributions cannot be determined. Moreover, any bias will propagate errors in estimations of overall microbial diversity and may exclude some microbial classes from study and exploitation. To improve metagenomic approaches, investigate DNA extraction biases, and provide tools for assessing the relative abundances of different groups, we explored the biodiversity of the accessible community DNA by fractioning the metagenomic DNA as a function of (i) vertical soil sampling, (ii) density gradients (cell separation), (iii) cell lysis stringency, and (iv) DNA fragment size distribution. Each fraction had a unique genetic diversity, with different predominant and rare species (based on ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis [RISA] fingerprinting and phylochips). All fractions contributed to the number of bacterial groups uncovered in the metagenome, thus increasing the DNA pool for further applications. Indeed, we were able to access a more genetically diverse proportion of the metagenome (a gain of more than 80% compared to the best single extraction method), limit the predominance of a few genomes, and increase the species richness per sequencing effort. This work stresses the difference between extracted DNA pools and the currently inaccessible complete soil metagenome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21183646      PMCID: PMC3067229          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01526-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  39 in total

1.  Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils.

Authors:  A Frostegård; S Courtois; V Ramisse; S Clerc; D Bernillon; F Le Gall; P Jeannin; X Nesme; P Simonet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Quantification of bacterial subgroups in soil: comparison of DNA extracted directly from soil or from cells previously released by density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  S Courtois; A Frostegård; P Göransson; G Depret; P Jeannin; P Simonet
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Prokaryotic diversity--magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors.

Authors:  Vigdis Torsvik; Lise Øvreås; Tron Frede Thingstad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The uncultured microbial majority.

Authors:  Michael S Rappé; Stephen J Giovannoni
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 15.500

5.  Amplification of DNA from native populations of soil bacteria by using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K D Bruce; W D Hiorns; J L Hobman; A M Osborn; P Strike; D A Ritchie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Exploring the microbial biodegradation and biotransformation gene pool.

Authors:  Teca Calcagno Galvão; William W Mohn; Víctor de Lorenzo
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity.

Authors:  Luiz F W Roesch; Roberta R Fulthorpe; Alberto Riva; George Casella; Alison K M Hadwin; Angela D Kent; Samira H Daroub; Flavio A O Camargo; William G Farmerie; Eric W Triplett
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment.

Authors:  Cora Carrigg; Olivia Rice; Siobhán Kavanagh; Gavin Collins; Vincent O'Flaherty
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Next-generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jay Shendure; Hanlee Ji
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  What would you do if you could sequence everything?

Authors:  Avak Kahvejian; John Quackenbush; John F Thompson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  63 in total

1.  Development and application of an enzymatic and cell flotation treatment for the recovery of viable microbial cells from environmental matrices such as anaerobic sludge.

Authors:  Florence Braun; Jérôme Hamelin; Gaëlle Gévaudan; Dominique Patureau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Physical Isolation of Endospores from Environmental Samples by Targeted Lysis of Vegetative Cells.

Authors:  Tina Wunderlin; Thomas Junier; Christophe Paul; Nicole Jeanneret; Pilar Junier
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Metagenomic mining for microbiologists.

Authors:  Tom O Delmont; Cedric Malandain; Emmanuel Prestat; Catherine Larose; Jean-Michel Monier; Pascal Simonet; Timothy M Vogel
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Analysis of Bacterial Communities by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in a Melon-Producing Agro-environment.

Authors:  Eduardo Franco-Frías; Victor Mercado-Guajardo; Angel Merino-Mascorro; Janeth Pérez-Garza; Norma Heredia; Juan S León; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Jorge Dávila-Aviña; Santos García
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Strengths and Biases of High-Throughput Sequencing Data in the Characterization of Freshwater Ciliate Microbiomes.

Authors:  Vittorio Boscaro; Alessia Rossi; Claudia Vannini; Franco Verni; Sergei I Fokin; Giulio Petroni
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 6.  Emergent Properties of Microbial Activity in Heterogeneous Soil Microenvironments: Different Research Approaches Are Slowly Converging, Yet Major Challenges Remain.

Authors:  Philippe C Baveye; Wilfred Otten; Alexandra Kravchenko; María Balseiro-Romero; Éléonore Beckers; Maha Chalhoub; Christophe Darnault; Thilo Eickhorst; Patricia Garnier; Simona Hapca; Serkan Kiranyaz; Olivier Monga; Carsten W Mueller; Naoise Nunan; Valérie Pot; Steffen Schlüter; Hannes Schmidt; Hans-Jörg Vogel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Characterization of bioaerosols from dairy barns: reconstructing the puzzle of occupational respiratory diseases by using molecular approaches.

Authors:  Pascale Blais Lecours; Marc Veillette; David Marsolais; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Changes in diversity, abundance, and structure of soil bacterial communities in Brazilian Savanna under different land use systems.

Authors:  Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto; Adão de Siqueira Ferreira; Anthony Diego Muller Barboza; Luiz Fernando Wurdig Roesch
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Survival of prokaryotes in a polluted waste dump during remediation by alkaline hydrolysis.

Authors:  Marie Bank Nielsen; Kasper Urup Kjeldsen; Mark Alexander Lever; Kjeld Ingvorsen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Targeted and highly multiplexed detection of microorganisms by employing an ensemble of molecular probes.

Authors:  Weihong Xu; Sujatha Krishnakumar; Molly Miranda; Michael A Jensen; Marilyn Fukushima; Curtis Palm; Eula Fung; Ronald W Davis; Robert P St Onge; Richard W Hyman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.