Literature DB >> 21183097

Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Jorge L Alió1, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David P Piñero, Francisco Amparo, Ramón Jiménez, Jose L Rodríguez-Prats, Jaime Javaloy, Vanessa Pongo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reading performance, changes in quality of life, and optical performance after cataract surgery with multifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
SETTING: Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: Patients with bilateral cataract had implantation of Acri.LISA 366D multifocal IOLs. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity outcomes were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Other parameters evaluated included reading performance (Salzburg Reading Desk), a 25-item quality-of-life questionnaire (National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 [NEI VFQ-25] and appendix NEI VFQ-39), and ocular optical performance (ocular aberrometry and modulation transfer function).
RESULTS: The study included 48 eyes (24 patients) ranging in age from 47 to 77 years. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (logMAR) improved significantly 1 month postoperatively (P<.01), with no significant changes afterward (6 months, P≥.06). The mean reading acuity without correction improved significantly from 0.68 logRAD ± 0.20 (SD) to 0.16 ± 0.08 logRAD 1 month after surgery (P < .01). However, it was worse by the end of the follow-up (6 months, P = .04). During the follow-up, no significant changes were found in the mean reading speed without near correction (6 months, P = .50). Contrast sensitivity improved significantly at all spatial frequencies under photopic and scotopic conditions after surgery (6 months, P≤.02). The quality-of-life index related to reading ability also improved significantly (3 months, P = .03).
CONCLUSION: Implantation of the multifocal diffractive IOL significantly improved reading performance, which had a positive effect on the patient's quality of life postoperatively. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21183097     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  18 in total

1.  Diffractive trifocal lens implantation with or without excimer laser enhancement: is a touch-up procedure a negative predictor for refractive and subjective outcome?

Authors:  Anne-Karen von Beckerath; Toam Katz; Anna Harfst; Vasyl Druchkiv; Andreas Frings
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Error induced by the estimation of the corneal power and the effective lens position with a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Vicente J Camps; María L Ramón; Verónica Mateo; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Özge Güngör Akkuş; Ikbal Seza Petriçli
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Mei-Fang Chu; Na Hui; Cong-Yi Wang; Lei Yu; Bo Ma; Yan Li; Cheng Pei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Eleonora Favuzza; Orsola Caporossi; Alfonso Savastano; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  [Multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) surgery in young non-presbyopic ametropes : Reasonable and safe?]

Authors:  A Frings; J Steinberg; S J Linke; V Druchkiv; T Katz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Implantation of Monofocal IOL in One Eye and ERV IOL in the Contralateral Eye with Mini-Monovision.

Authors:  Sheetal Brar; Sri Ganesh; Raghavender Reddy Arra; Smith Snehal Sute
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-04

8.  Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jérôme C Vryghem; Steven Heireman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Visual Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence with a Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Florian Tobias Alwin Kretz; Chul Young Choi; Matthias Müller; Matthias Gerl; Ralf Helmar Gerl; Gerd Uwe Auffarth
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18

10.  Clinical outcomes with a new microincisional diffractive multifocal IOL.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Alfredo Vega-Estrada; Ana B Plaza-Puche
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.