BACKGROUND: Active patient-based learning by working together at an interprofessional clinical education ward (CEW) increases collaborative and professional competence among students. AIM: To assess the patients' perceptions of collaborative and communicative aspects of care when treated by interprofessional student teams as compared to usual care. METHOD: Patients treated by student teams (medical, nurse, physiotherapy and occupational therapy students) at a CEW comprised the intervention group. Patients treated at a regular ward were taken as controls. The patients answered a questionnaire representing collaborative and communicative aspects of care. Questionnaires from CEW (n = 84) and control (n = 62) patients were obtained (82% vs 73% response rates). RESULTS: CEW patients rated a significantly higher grade of own participation in decisions regarding treatment as compared to controls (p = 0.006). They did further rate a higher grade of satisfaction with information regarding need of help at home (p = 0.003) and perceived that the CEW staff had taken their home situation into account at a higher grade in the preparation of discharge (p = 0.0002). Finally, CEW patients felt better informed (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients perceived a higher grade of quality of care as compared to controls with no signs of disadvantages when treated and informed by supervised interprofessional student teams.
BACKGROUND: Active patient-based learning by working together at an interprofessional clinical education ward (CEW) increases collaborative and professional competence among students. AIM: To assess the patients' perceptions of collaborative and communicative aspects of care when treated by interprofessional student teams as compared to usual care. METHOD:Patients treated by student teams (medical, nurse, physiotherapy and occupational therapy students) at a CEW comprised the intervention group. Patients treated at a regular ward were taken as controls. The patients answered a questionnaire representing collaborative and communicative aspects of care. Questionnaires from CEW (n = 84) and control (n = 62) patients were obtained (82% vs 73% response rates). RESULTS: CEW patients rated a significantly higher grade of own participation in decisions regarding treatment as compared to controls (p = 0.006). They did further rate a higher grade of satisfaction with information regarding need of help at home (p = 0.003) and perceived that the CEW staff had taken their home situation into account at a higher grade in the preparation of discharge (p = 0.0002). Finally, CEW patients felt better informed (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION:Patients perceived a higher grade of quality of care as compared to controls with no signs of disadvantages when treated and informed by supervised interprofessional student teams.
Authors: Elaissa L Trybus Hardy; Brenda Williams; Christopher Harden; Oluwamayokun Oshinowo; Renee Copeland; Marcus A Carden; Beatrice E Gee; Wilbur A Lam Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Thomas W Vijn; Cornelia R M G Fluit; Jan A M Kremer; Thimpe Beune; Marjan J Faber; Hub Wollersheim Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Maria Fröberg; Charlotte Leanderson; Birgitta Fläckman; Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf; Karin Björklund; Gunnar H Nilsson; Terese Stenfors Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 2.581