Literature DB >> 21182154

Small area variation and geographic and patient-specific determinants of metabolic testing in antipsychotic users.

Elaine H Morrato1, Benjamin G Druss, Daniel M Hartung, Robert J Valuck, Deborah Thomas, Richard Allen, Elizabeth Campagna, John W Newcomer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American Diabetes Association and American Psychiatric Association recommend metabolic monitoring for all patients using second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) drugs. We estimated glucose and lipid testing rates among SGA-users from three state Medicaid programs and investigated small area variation and patient and geographic determinants of testing.
METHODS: A retrospective new-user cohort study using Medicaid claims data from California, Missouri, and Oregon was conducted among 30,563 patients in 207 counties starting SGA medication September 2004-December 2005. Adjusted odds ratios for state, county, and patient factors associated with testing were calculated from multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Mean 6-month testing rates were 51.6% (glucose) and 26.2% (lipids). Screening rates were positively associated with the number of Type 2 diabetes risk factors (RF) present: glucose -39% (0 RF) to 82% (5 RF); lipids -13% (0 RF) to 66% (5 RF). A four-fold difference in glucose testing rates (21-85%) and a greater than six-fold difference in lipid testing rates (0-62%) were observed between counties. In the adjusted regression models, age, cardiometabolic co-morbidity (diabetes, dyslipidemia), serious mental illness, persistent use of SGAs, and frequency of non-psychiatric medical office visits were significant determinants of glucose and lipid testing. Lipid testing was more likely for children and adults in California, as was glucose testing for children.
CONCLUSIONS: Glucose and lipid testing among SGA-users varied significantly between states, counties, and by patient characteristics. More effort is needed to understand provider and system reasons for testing disparities in order to inform risk management quality improvement interventions.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21182154     DOI: 10.1002/pds.2062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

1.  Predictors of metabolic parameter monitoring in adolescents on antipsychotics in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Sameer R Ghate; Christina A Porucznik; Qayyim Said; Mia Hashibe; Elizabeth Joy; Diana I Brixner
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2012-09

2.  Antipsychotic Cardiometabolic Side Effect Monitoring in a State Community Mental Health System.

Authors:  Robert O Cotes; Alex de Nesnera; Michael Kelly; Karen Orsini; Haiyi Xie; Greg McHugo; Stephen Bartels; Mary F Brunette
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2015-02-03

3.  Changes in antipsychotic use among patients with severe mental illness after a Food and Drug Administration advisory.

Authors:  Stacie B Dusetzina; Alisa B Busch; Rena M Conti; Julie M Donohue; G Caleb Alexander; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Psychotropic drug use among preschool children in the Medicaid program from 36 states.

Authors:  Lauren D Garfield; Derek S Brown; Benjamin T Allaire; Raven E Ross; Ginger E Nicol; Ramesh Raghavan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Role of Clinical Setting and Management Approach in Metabolic Testing Among Youths and Adults Treated With Antipsychotics.

Authors:  Ginger E Nicol; Elizabeth J Campagna; Lauren D Garfield; John W Newcomer; Joseph J Parks; Elaine H Morrato
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Recent advances in understanding and mitigating adipogenic and metabolic effects of antipsychotic drugs.

Authors:  Julia M Gohlke; Emily J Dhurandhar; Christoph U Correll; Elaine H Morrato; John W Newcomer; Gary Remington; Henry A Nasrallah; Stephen Crystal; Ginger Nicol; David B Allison
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Screening for cardiovascular risk factors in adults with serious mental illness: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Julia B Baller; Emma E McGinty; Susan T Azrin; Denise Juliano-Bult; Gail L Daumit
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Utilization of the Behavior Change Wheel framework to develop a model to improve cardiometabolic screening for people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Christina Mangurian; Grace C Niu; Dean Schillinger; John W Newcomer; James Dilley; Margaret A Handley
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Antipsychotic medication adherence and preventive diabetes screening in Medicaid enrollees with serious mental illness: an analysis of real-world administrative data.

Authors:  Erica L Stockbridge; Nathaniel J Webb; Eleena Dhakal; Manasa Garg; Abiah D Loethen; Thaddeus L Miller; Karabi Nandy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Adjusting for geographic variation in observational comparative effectiveness studies: a case study of antipsychotics using state Medicaid data.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dowling Root; Deborah S K Thomas; Elizabeth J Campagna; Elaine H Morrato
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.