Literature DB >> 2118171

Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy.

G J Hankey1, C P Warlow, A J Molyneux.   

Abstract

It is essential to image the carotid bifurcation adequately in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia if they are being considered for carotid endarterectomy. Optimal resolution is achieved by selective intraarterial contrast angiography which is an invasive procedure carrying some risk. The overall risk-benefit of carotid endarterectomy is currently being investigated in several large randomised trials in Europe and North America. Because cerebral angiography is a prerequisite for carotid endarterectomy, the risks of cerebral angiography will need to be added to those of surgery when considering whether carotid endarterectomy is effective in the management of these patients. This study evaluated prospectively 382 patients with symptomatically mild carotid ischaemia who had cerebral angiography to visualise a potentially resectable lesion at the carotid bifurcation. Complications followed 14 cerebral angiograms in 13 patients (3.4%); two complications were local (0.5%), two systemic (0.5%) and 10 were neurological (2.6%). The neurological complications were transient (TIA 1, generalised seizure 1) in two patients (0.5%), reversible (stroke) in three (0.8%) and permanent (stroke) in five patients (1.3%). There were no deaths. The significant risk factors for post angiographic stroke were (1) stroke before angiography compared with transient ischaemic attacks of the eye or brain and (2) the presence of greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis of the symptomatic internal carotid artery; unfortunately it may be the latter patients who are most at risk of stroke as part of the natural history of their disease and therefore most in need of prophylactic carotid endarterectomy (which requires cerebral angiography). The absolute risk of post-angiographic stroke of patients for cerebral angiography using clinical evaluation and Duplex carotid ultrasound screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2118171      PMCID: PMC488126          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  19 in total

1.  The failure of intravenous digital subtraction angiography in replacing carotid arteriography.

Authors:  R D Cebul; R A Paulus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J A Murie; P J Morris
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Neurological complications of cerebral angiography.

Authors:  M Gasparini; M Arosio; N Galbiati; S Cappa; E Rota; L Bevilacqua; R Sterzi
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1986-06

4.  Neurologic complications of angiography in patients with critical stenosis of the carotid artery.

Authors:  R L Eisenberg; W O Bank; M W Hedgcock
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Complications of intravenous digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  J B Ball; R R Lukin; T A Tomsick; A A Chambers
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-10

6.  Complications of intravenous DSA performed for carotid artery disease: a prospective study.

Authors:  J O Aaron; J R Hesselink; R Oot; R L Jones; K R Davis; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Outcome in patients with asymptomatic neck bruits.

Authors:  B R Chambers; J W Norris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Complications following transfemoral cerebral angiography for cerebral ischemia. Report of 159 angiograms and correlation with surgical risk.

Authors:  B C Theodotou; R Whaley; M S Mahaley
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1987-08

9.  Neurological morbidity of arch and carotid arteriography in cerebrovascular disease. The influence of contrast medium and radiologist.

Authors:  J McIvor; T J Steiner; G D Perkin; R M Greenhalgh; F C Rose
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral).

Authors:  I O Skalpe; I M Anke
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  26 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography. Cooperative study between the ASNR, ASITN, and the SCVIR. American Society of Neuroradiology. American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Evaluation of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass function with magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  P Horn; P Vajkoczy; P Schmiedek; W Neff
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Perioperative stroke. Part I: General surgery, carotid artery disease, and carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  D H Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention.

Authors:  John J Connors; David Sacks; Anthony J Furlan; Warren R Selman; Eric J Russell; Philip E Stieg; Mark N Hadley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Cost-effective investigation of patients with suspected transient ischaemic attacks.

Authors:  G J Hankey; C P Warlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 7.  [Extracranial carotid stenosis: diagnostics, therapy and follow-up].

Authors:  W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  [Neurology and carotid artery interventions. What has to be done first?].

Authors:  T Reiff; P A Ringleb
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 9.  Vascular imaging in stroke: comparative analysis.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Non-invasive carotid imaging.

Authors:  G R Young; P R Humphrey; T E Nixon; E T Smith
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.