Literature DB >> 21181470

Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not compromise the surgical outcome.

Joon Suk Park1, Hong Kwan Kim, Yong Soo Choi, Jhingook Kim, Young Mog Shim, Kwhanmien Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns remain unresolved regarding the safety of unplanned conversion to open thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. We analyzed both early and late outcomes after thoracotomy conversion from VATS.
METHODS: From December 2003 to December 2008, a total of 738 VATS lobectomies were attempted. Among them were 34 unplanned conversions to open thoracotomy. Patient characteristics, operative data, and early and late postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Among the 34 conversion cases, 26 patients had lung cancer and 8 had benign lung disease. The conversion rate was 4.61%. Left and right upper lobectomies were most often associated with unplanned conversions. Conversion was classified into five groups: (1) problems related to anthracofibrosis of hilar lymph nodes in 14 patients; (2) intraoperative vessel or bronchus injury in 11 patients; (3) fused interlobar fissure in 4 patients; (4) oncologic problems, including mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastasis in 2 patients; and (5) vascular anomalies in 3 patients. There was one death due to postoperative pneumonia in a patient with multiple co-morbidities. Two patients had an episode of pneumonia. The mean hospital stay was 10 days, and the median follow-up period was 30.0 ± 11.47 months. Three patients with lung cancer developed recurrent disease, all of whom were found to have stage III disease. No cancer-related death occurred. There was no significant difference in survival or recurrence between patients with conversion and those with successful VATS. However, the operating time and hospital stay were significantly longer in conversion patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the claim that VATS lobectomy can be safely performed with an acceptable conversion rate. Unplanned conversion to open thoracotomy does not appear to compromise the prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21181470     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0913-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

1.  Outcomes of unexpected pathologic N1 and N2 disease after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hong Kwan Kim; Yong Soo Choi; Jhingook Kim; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the lung: analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications over 15 years and review of the literature.

Authors:  L Solaini; F Prusciano; P Bagioni; F di Francesco; L Solaini; D B Poddie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Jason P Shaw; Francine R Dembitzer; Juan P Wisnivesky; Virginia R Litle; Todd S Weiser; Jaime Yun; Cynthia Chin; Scott J Swanson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tristan D Yan; Deborah Black; Paul G Bannon; Brian C McCaughan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy with systemic lymph node dissection for lymph node positive non-small cell lung cancer--is thoracoscopic lymph node dissection feasible?

Authors:  T Shiraishi; M Hiratsuka; Y Yoshinaga; S Yamamoto; A Iwasaki; T Shirakusa
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer.

Authors:  G Roviaro; C Rebuffat; F Varoli; C Vergani; C Mariani; M Maciocco
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-09

8.  Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Tomaszek; Stephen D Cassivi; K Robert Shen; Mark S Allen; Francis C Nichols; Claude Deschamps; Dennis A Wigle
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy requiring emergency conversion to thoracotomy.

Authors:  Shigeki Sawada; Eisaku Komori; Motohiro Yamashita
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Thoracoscopic resection of 85 pulmonary lesions.

Authors:  R J Landreneau; S R Hazelrigg; P F Ferson; J A Johnson; W Nawarawong; T M Boley; J J Curtis; C M Bowers; D B Herlan; R D Dowling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  30 in total

1.  Uniportal complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with partial pulmonary arterioplasty for lung cancer with calcified lymph node.

Authors:  Guang-Suo Wang; Jian Wang; Zhan-Peng Rao; Guang-Gui Ding; Zheng Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  [Application of the da Vinci robotic system in thoracic surgery].

Authors:  M Ismail; M Swierzy; M Ulrich; J C Rückert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Surgical Outcome of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery vs. Thoracotomy for Primary Lung Cancer >5 cm in Diameter.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Nakano; Shunsuke Endo; Tetsuya Endo; Shinichi Otani; Hiroyoshi Tsubochi; Shinichi Yamamoto; Kenji Tetsuka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

4.  Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy.

Authors:  Kwhanmien Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-02-12

5.  [Invasive procedure for clarification of pulmonary nodules].

Authors:  A H Mahnken
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Troubleshooting in thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Prevention and management of intraoperative crisis in VATS and open chest surgery: how to avoid emergency conversion.

Authors:  Fernando M Safdie; Manuel Villa Sanchez; Inderpal S Sarkaria
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-26

8.  Staged bronchial closure in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for lung cancer with calcified lymph nodes.

Authors:  Ying-Yuan Chen; Tzu-Hung Lin; Chao-Chun Chang; Wei-Li Huang; Yi-Ting Yen; Yau-Lin Tseng
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-28

Review 9.  Reasons for conversion during VATS lobectomy: what happens with increased experience.

Authors:  Dario Amore; Davide Di Natale; Roberto Scaramuzzi; Carlo Curcio
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 10.  Contraindications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy and determinants of conversion to open.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hanna; Mark F Berry; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.