Literature DB >> 18222201

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: state of the art and future directions.

Jason P Shaw1, Francine R Dembitzer, Juan P Wisnivesky, Virginia R Litle, Todd S Weiser, Jaime Yun, Cynthia Chin, Scott J Swanson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic lobectomy is performed with increasing frequency for early-stage lung cancer. Several published reports suggest thoracoscopic resection is safe, with the potential advantage of shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery, and comparable oncologic results.
METHODS: Data on 180 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy or sublobar anatomic resection at our institution between January 2002 and December 2006 were reviewed. The conversion rate to thoracotomy, complications, length of stay, and duration of chest tube drainage were determined. Similar variables were evaluated for patients aged older than 80 years, those with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) that was less than 50% predicted, those who had undergone preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, and those who had undergone lung-sparing anatomic resections.
RESULTS: Thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection was performed successfully in 166 patients. One of 180 patients (0.6%) died, and 14 patients (9.2%) underwent conversions. Overall median length of stay was 4 days (range, 1 to 98; interquartile range [IQR], 3), and median duration of chest tube drainage was 3 days (range, 0 to 35 days; IQR, 2). The median length of hospital stay and median chest tube duration for the group aged 80 years and older was 5 and 3 days; for the segmental resection group, 4 and 3 days; for the chemotherapy or radiotherapy induction group, 3.5 and 3 days; and for the FEV1 less than 50% group, 5.5 and 4 days, respectively. No patients died in any of these groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic lung resection can be performed safely in selected patients aged 80 years and older, in those with marginal pulmonary function, and in those with pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222201     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  36 in total

1.  Outcomes of a hybrid technique for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resection in a community setting.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe; Charles G Lockhart
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sanghoon Jheon; Hee Chul Yang; Sukki Cho
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28

3.  Diagnostic and therapeutic value of computed tomography guided coil placement after digital subtraction angiography guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery resection for solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Yong Qiang; Lei Zhang; Nan Yang; Jian Xu; De-Min Li; Tangfeng Lv; Ping Zhan; Yong Song; Zhong-Dong Li; Hao Li
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10

4.  Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not compromise the surgical outcome.

Authors:  Joon Suk Park; Hong Kwan Kim; Yong Soo Choi; Jhingook Kim; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Johannes Bodner; Herbert Maier; Christoph Schwinghammer; Burkhard Pichler; Paolo Lucciarini; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  A hybrid technique: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resections for community-based surgeons.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe; Charles G Lockhart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Ming-Hui Hung; Hsao-Hsun Hsu; Ya-Jung Cheng; Jin-Shing Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lynda Wyld; Riccardo A Audisio; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Surgical management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Adam Lackey; Jessica S Donington
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 10.  Contraindications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy and determinants of conversion to open.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hanna; Mark F Berry; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.