Literature DB >> 21181387

[Fool's gold standards in language screening. Sensitivity and specificity of the Hessian child language screening test (Kindersprachscreening, KiSS)].

K Neumann1, I Holler-Zittlau, S van Minnen, U Sick, Y Zaretsky, H A Euler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The German Kindersprachscreening (KiSS) is a universal speech and language screening test for large-scale identification of Hessian kindergarten children requiring special educational language training or clinical speech/language therapy. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: To calculate the procedural screening validity, 257 children (aged 4.0 to 4.5 years) were tested using KiSS and four language tests (Reynell Development Language Scales III, Patholinguistische Diagnostik, PLAKSS, AWST-R). The majority or consensus judgements of three speech-language professionals, based on the language test results, served as a reference criterion. The base (fail) rates of the professionals were either self-determined or preset based on known prevalence rates.
RESULTS: Screening validity was higher for preset than for self-determined base rates due to higher inter-judge agreement. The confusion matrices of the overall index classification of the KiSS (speech-language abnormalities with educational or clinical needs) with the fixed base rate expert judgement about language impairment, including fluency or voice disorders, yielded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 78%, for just language impairment 84% and 75%, respectively. Specificities for disorders requiring clinical diagnostics in the KiSS (language impairment alone or combined with fluency/voice disorders) related to the test-based consensus expert judgment was about 93%. Sensitivities were unsatisfactory because the differentiation between educational and clinical needs requires improvement.
CONCLUSION: Since the judgement concordances between the speech-language professionals was only moderate, the development of a comprehensive German reference test for speech and language disorders with evidence-based algorithmic decision rules rather than subjective clinical judgement is advocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21181387     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-010-2231-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  16 in total

1.  Early childhood stuttering I: persistency and recovery rates.

Authors:  E Yairi; N G Ambrose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The parameters of early language screening.

Authors:  J Law; F Harris
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.508

3.  Taxometric analyses of specific language impairment in 3- and 4-year-old children.

Authors:  Christine A Dollaghan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A randomized control trial to investigate the impact of the Lidcombe Program on early stuttering in German-speaking preschoolers.

Authors:  Christina Lattermann; Harald A Euler; Katrin Neumann
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  Psychosocial outcomes at 15 years of children with a preschool history of speech-language impairment.

Authors:  Margaret J Snowling; D V M Bishop; Susan E Stothard; Barry Chipchase; Carole Kaplan
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 6.  Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Peggy Nygren; Miranda Walker; Rita Panoscha
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; N L Records; P Buckwalter; X Zhang; E Smith; M O'Brien
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Law; Zoe Garrett; Chad Nye
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Clinical decision making: describing the decision rules of practicing speech-language pathologists.

Authors:  N L Records; J B Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

10.  High heritability of speech and language impairments in 6-year-old twins demonstrated using parent and teacher report.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Glynis Laws; Caroline Adams; Courtenay Frazier Norbury
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 2.805

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Guideline-conform diagnostics in language impairments].

Authors:  M Ptok; D Kühn; M Jungheim; C Schwemmle; S Miller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Identifying Language Disorder Within a Migration Context: Development and Performance of a Pre-school Screening Tool for Children With German as a Second Language.

Authors:  Daniel Holzinger; Christoph Weber; Magdalena Jezek
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  The Effectiveness of an Integrated Treatment for Functional Speech Sound Disorders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Denise I Siemons-Lühring; Harald A Euler; Philipp Mathmann; Boris Suchan; Katrin Neumann
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.