BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that changes in vascular flow dynamics resulting from age and cardiovascular disease (CVD) would correlate to neurocognitive capacities, even in adults screened to exclude dementia and neurological disease. We studied endothelial-dependent as well as endothelial-independent brachial responses in older adults with CVD to study the associations of vascular responses with cognition. Comprehensive neurocognitive testing was used to discern which specific cognitive domain(s) correlated to the vascular responses. METHODS: Eighty-eight independent, community-dwelling older adults (70.02+7.67 years) with mild to severe CVD were recruited. Enrollees were thoroughly screened to exclude neurological disease and dementia. Flow-mediated (endothelial-dependent) and nitroglycerin-mediated (endothelial-independent) brachial artery responses were assessed using 2-d ultrasound. Cognitive functioning was assessed using comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between the endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular flow dynamics and specific domains of neurocognitive function. RESULTS: Endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent brachial artery responses both correlated with neurocognitive testing indices. The strongest independent relationship was between endothelial function and measures of attention-executive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular responsiveness correlate with neurocognitive performance among older CVD patients, particularly in the attention-executive domain. While further study is needed to substantiate causal relationships, our data demonstrate that brachial responses serve as important markers of risk for common neurocognitive changes. Learning and behavior-modifying therapeutic strategies that compensate for such common, insidious neurocognitive limitations will likely improve caregiving efficacy.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that changes in vascular flow dynamics resulting from age and cardiovascular disease (CVD) would correlate to neurocognitive capacities, even in adults screened to exclude dementia and neurological disease. We studied endothelial-dependent as well as endothelial-independent brachial responses in older adults with CVD to study the associations of vascular responses with cognition. Comprehensive neurocognitive testing was used to discern which specific cognitive domain(s) correlated to the vascular responses. METHODS: Eighty-eight independent, community-dwelling older adults (70.02+7.67 years) with mild to severe CVD were recruited. Enrollees were thoroughly screened to exclude neurological disease and dementia. Flow-mediated (endothelial-dependent) and nitroglycerin-mediated (endothelial-independent) brachial artery responses were assessed using 2-d ultrasound. Cognitive functioning was assessed using comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between the endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular flow dynamics and specific domains of neurocognitive function. RESULTS: Endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent brachial artery responses both correlated with neurocognitive testing indices. The strongest independent relationship was between endothelial function and measures of attention-executive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vascular responsiveness correlate with neurocognitive performance among older CVD patients, particularly in the attention-executive domain. While further study is needed to substantiate causal relationships, our data demonstrate that brachial responses serve as important markers of risk for common neurocognitive changes. Learning and behavior-modifying therapeutic strategies that compensate for such common, insidious neurocognitive limitations will likely improve caregiving efficacy.
Authors: Karin F Hoth; David F Tate; Athena Poppas; Daniel E Forman; John Gunstad; David J Moser; Robert H Paul; Angela L Jefferson; Andreana P Haley; Ronald A Cohen Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Minoru Asahi; Zhihong Huang; Sunu Thomas; Shin-ichi Yoshimura; Toshihisa Sumii; Tatsuro Mori; Jianhua Qiu; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Paul L Huang; James K Liao; Eng H Lo; Michael A Moskowitz Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: T Neunteufl; R Katzenschlager; A Hassan; U Klaar; S Schwarzacher; D Glogar; P Bauer; F Weidinger Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 1997-02-28 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: A Uehata; E H Lieberman; M D Gerhard; T J Anderson; P Ganz; J F Polak; M A Creager; A C Yeung Journal: Vasc Med Date: 1997 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Lauren E Salminen; Peter R Schofield; Kerrie D Pierce; Yi Zhao; Xi Luo; Youdan Wang; David H Laidlaw; Ryan P Cabeen; Thomas E Conturo; David F Tate; Erbil Akbudak; Elizabeth M Lane; Jodi M Heaps; Jacob D Bolzenius; Laurie M Baker; Lee M Cagle; Robert H Paul Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Andreana P Haley; Karin F Hoth; John Gunstad; Robert H Paul; Angela L Jefferson; David F Tate; Makoto Ono; Beth A Jerskey; Athena Poppas; Lawrence H Sweet; Ronald A Cohen Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Chelsea M Stillman; Andrea M Weinstein; Anna L Marsland; Peter J Gianaros; Kirk I Erickson Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Sarah J Catchlove; Helen Macpherson; Matthew E Hughes; Yufen Chen; Todd B Parrish; Andrew Pipingas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eros da Mota Dias; Luiz Tadeu Giollo; Débora Dada Martinelli; Camila Mazeti; Heitor Moreno Júnior; José Fernando Vilela-Martin; Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 2.062