BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The presence of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI is common among elderly individuals. Previous research suggests that cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased white matter hyperintensities. Examining the role of direct physiological measures of vascular function will help to clarify the vascular mechanisms related to white matter hyperintensities. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vasodilatation and white matter hyperintensity volume. METHODS: Twenty-five older adults with a range of cardiovascular diseases underwent brain MRI and completed assessments of blood vessel integrity using endothelial-dependent and independent flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery. A semi-automated pixel-based method was used to quantify total brain volume and white matter hyperintensity volume, with white matter hyperintensity volume corrected for total brain volume. The association between measures of flow-mediated dilation and log-transformed white matter hyperintensities was examined. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that endothelial-dependent vasodilatation was significantly and inversely associated with white matter hyperintensity volume. In contrast, endothelial-independent vasodilatation was not associated with white matter hyperintensities. Neither endothelial-dependent nor endothelial-independent vasodilatation was associated with total brain volume. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide preliminary evidence that the integrity of the vascular endothelium is associated with white matter hyperintensities in older adults with cardiovascular disease. Impaired vascular function may be one mechanism that contributes to the development of white matter hyperintensities in the brain. Additional longitudinal research combining measures of vessel function, neuroimaging and cognition will be helpful in clarifying this potential mechanism.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The presence of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI is common among elderly individuals. Previous research suggests that cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased white matter hyperintensities. Examining the role of direct physiological measures of vascular function will help to clarify the vascular mechanisms related to white matter hyperintensities. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vasodilatation and white matter hyperintensity volume. METHODS: Twenty-five older adults with a range of cardiovascular diseases underwent brain MRI and completed assessments of blood vessel integrity using endothelial-dependent and independent flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery. A semi-automated pixel-based method was used to quantify total brain volume and white matter hyperintensity volume, with white matter hyperintensity volume corrected for total brain volume. The association between measures of flow-mediated dilation and log-transformed white matter hyperintensities was examined. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that endothelial-dependent vasodilatation was significantly and inversely associated with white matter hyperintensity volume. In contrast, endothelial-independent vasodilatation was not associated with white matter hyperintensities. Neither endothelial-dependent nor endothelial-independent vasodilatation was associated with total brain volume. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide preliminary evidence that the integrity of the vascular endothelium is associated with white matter hyperintensities in older adults with cardiovascular disease. Impaired vascular function may be one mechanism that contributes to the development of white matter hyperintensities in the brain. Additional longitudinal research combining measures of vessel function, neuroimaging and cognition will be helpful in clarifying this potential mechanism.
Authors: John Gunstad; Ronald A Cohen; David F Tate; Robert H Paul; Athena Poppas; Karin Hoth; Kristin L Macgregor; Angela L Jefferson Journal: Blood Press Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Robert H Paul; Omar Haque; John Gunstad; David F Tate; Stuart M Grieve; Karin Hoth; Adam M Brickman; Ronald Cohen; Kelly Lange; Angela L Jefferson; Kristin L MacGregor; Evian Gordon Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Jie Liu; Benjamin Y Tseng; Muhammad Ayaz Khan; Takashi Tarumi; Candace Hill; Niki Mirshams; Timea M Hodics; Linda S Hynan; Rong Zhang Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Joshua I Barzilay; James F Lovato; Anne M Murray; Jeff Williamson; Faramaz Ismail-Beigi; Diane Karl; Vasilios Papademetriou; Lenore J Launer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ronald A Cohen; Athena Poppas; Daniel E Forman; Karin F Hoth; Andreana P Haley; John Gunstad; Angela L Jefferson; David F Tate; Robert H Paul; Lawrence H Sweet; Mokato Ono; Beth A Jerskey; Marie Gerhard-Herman Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Patrick J Smith; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Babyak; Alan Hinderliter; Andrew Sherwood Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Farzin Irani; Lawrence H Sweet; Andreana P Haley; John J Gunstad; Beth A Jerskey; Richard C Mulligan; Angela L Jefferson; Athena Poppas; Ronald A Cohen Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Christopher D Beer; Kathleen Potter; David Blacker; Leonard Arnolda; Graeme J Hankey; Ian B Puddey Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 2.062