| Literature DB >> 21179318 |
Raja Kumar Seshadri1, Makarand Madhukar Desai, Thummala Veera Raghavaraju, Deepa Krishnan, Dama Venugopala Rao, Ivon Elisha Chakravarthy.
Abstract
A simple ultra performance liquid chromatographic (UPLC) method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of Metoprolol (MT), Atorvastatin (AT) and Ramipril (RM) from capsule dosage form. The method was developed using Zorbax XDB-C18 (4.6 mm à 50 mm, 1.8 Îm) column with a mobile phase consisting of 0.06% ortho phosphoric acid in Milli Q water having an ion pair reagent, 0.0045 M Sodium lauryl sulphate as buffer, at ratio of buffer: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v), at 55ÂC column temperature with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Detection was carried out with ultra-violet detection at 210 nm for RM, MT and AT respectively. The retention times were about 1.3, 2.1 and 2.6 min for MT, AT and RM respectively, the method was validated for linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness and ruggedness. The % mean recoveries are 101.9, 102.1 and 101.4 for MT, AT and RM respectively. The method was found to be rugged and robust and can be successfully used to determine the three drugs and its combinations.Entities:
Keywords: Chromatography; Fixed-dose combination; Impurities; Method Validation; Reviro
Year: 2010 PMID: 21179318 PMCID: PMC3007609 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1004-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Fig.1.Chemical structures of RM, AT and MT
Fig. 3.Overlay chromatogram of blank and standard, extracted at 210nm for RM, AT and MT
Fig. 4.Overlay chromatogram of Placebo and Test, extracted at 210nm for RM, AT and MT
Fig. 5.Spiked chromatogram of AT, RM and MT along with impurities.
System suitability results
| Retention times min | 1.310 | 2.252 | 2.661 |
| Theoretical plates | 7638 | 8581 | 4958 |
| Asymmetric factor | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Resolution | – | 10 | 4 |
Forced degradation data
| Exposed to Visible light for about 1,200 K lux | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| Exposed to UV for 200 Watt hours m−2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Exposed to humidity at 25 °C, 90% RH for about 7 days | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Refluxed with purified water for about 1 hour at 60 °C | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Refluxed with 0.1 N HCI solution for about 30 min at 60 °C | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.7 |
| Refluxed with 0.1 N NaOH solution for about 30 min at 60 °C | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.6 |
| Refluxed with 3% H2O2 solution for about 30 min at 60 °C | 0.3 | 2.2 | 4.8 |
| Exposed to dry heat for about 15 hours at 105 °C | 0.4 | 32.3 | 33.5 |
Fig. 6.Chromatogram and purity plots of heat stressed MT, AT and RM capsules test
Precision of the method
| 1. | 101.9 | 102.4 | 102.2 |
| 2. | 101.5 | 101.7 | 100.4 |
| 3. | 102.0 | 102.0 | 101.7 |
| 4. | 101.3 | 102.3 | 102.3 |
| 5. | 102.3 | 102.1 | 100.4 |
| 6. | 102.3 | 102.3 | 101.5 |
| Average | 101.9 | 102.1 | 101.4 |
| % RSD | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
Accuracy of the method
| 20% | 99.960 | 101.0 | 20.565 | 101.6 | 10.283 | 100.6 | |||
| 50% | 246.954 | 101.8 | 52.036 | 100.2 | 26.018 | 102.0 | |||
| 80% | 392.084 | 102.1 | 101.8 | 80.700 | 102.5 | 101.8 | 40.350 | 101.4 | 101.2 |
| 100% | 495.629 | 102.1 | 102.731 | 102.4 | 51.366 | 101.0 | |||
| 160% | 783.014 | 102.0 | 162.870 | 102.4 | 81.435 | 101.0 |
Mean for three determinations at each level.