Literature DB >> 21179254

Virtual patients and problem-based learning in advanced therapeutics.

Neal Benedict1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To enhance student learning of a complex therapeutic concept through the incorporation of 2 case-based, active-learning strategies with lecture in a required advanced therapeutics course.
DESIGN: A virtual patient session using a branched-outcome decision-making model and a problem-based learning (PBL) practica were developed from the course learning objectives for severe sepsis and septic shock. Following lecture of this material, students were required to complete the simulation session and attend the PBL. ASSESSMENT: Student learning was assessed through review of examination scores, as well as quality and accuracy of the pharmaceutical care plan developed as part of the PBL. Satisfaction of the teaching format was assessed through a course evaluation survey. For questions pertaining to sepsis or septic shock on the final examination, the class average was 90%, despite an average of 76% on the examination as a whole. Class average for the pharmacuetical care plan was 90%. Sixty-three percent of students stated the simulation contributed to their learning, and 93% stated the PBL contributed to their learning.
CONCLUSION: Using a multifaceted teaching approach, combining active- and passive-learning strategies, was well received by students and fostered an effective learning environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active learning; clinical decision making; problem-based learning; simulation; virtual patient

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21179254      PMCID: PMC2987283          DOI: 10.5688/aj7408143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps.

Authors:  David A Cook; Marc M Triola
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Fundamental concepts of problem-based learning for the new facilitator.

Authors:  S L Kanter
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1998-07

4.  CASE: a Computer-Aided Simulation of the Clinical Encounter.

Authors:  W G Harless; G G Drennon; J J Marxer; J A Root; G E Miller
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1971-05

5.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools.

Authors:  Grace Huang; Robby Reynolds; Chris Candler
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Clinical and economic outcomes of involving pharmacists in the direct care of critically ill patients with infections.

Authors:  Robert MacLaren; C A Bond; Steven J Martin; David Fike
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Virtual patients: ED-2 band-aid or valuable asset in the learning portfolio?

Authors:  Janet Tworek; Sylvain Coderre; Bruce Wright; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

  8 in total
  20 in total

1.  Computer-based simulation training to improve learning outcomes in mannequin-based simulation exercises.

Authors:  Lindsay B Curtin; Laura A Finn; Quinn A Czosnowski; Craig B Whitman; Michael J Cawley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Physical assessment experience in a problem-based learning course.

Authors:  Justin J Sherman; Daniel M Riche; Kayla R Stover
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Transitioning knowledge gained from simulation to pharmacy practice.

Authors:  Sandra L Kane-Gill; Pamela L Smithburger
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Integration of problem-based learning and innovative technology into a self-care course.

Authors:  Marsha McFalls
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Promotion of self-directed learning using virtual patient cases.

Authors:  Neal Benedict; Kristine Schonder; James McGee
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  A virtual patient software program to improve pharmacy student learning in a comprehensive disease management course.

Authors:  Mark A Douglass; Jillian P Casale; J Andrew Skirvin; Margarita V DiVall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Blended Simulation Progress Testing for Assessment of Practice Readiness.

Authors:  Neal Benedict; Pamela Smithburger; Amy Calabrese Donihi; Philip Empey; Lawrence Kobulinsky; Amy Seybert; Thomas Waters; Scott Drab; John Lutz; Deborah Farkas; Susan Meyer
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Online virtual-patient cases versus traditional problem-based learning in advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Sara Al-Dahir; Kendrea Bryant; Kathleen B Kennedy; Donna S Robinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Virtual Patient Case Sharing Across Two Schools of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Laura A Siemianowski; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 10.  Effectiveness of educational technology to improve patient care in pharmacy curricula.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.