Literature DB >> 21178920

Measuring ovarian function in young cancer survivors.

H I Su1.   

Abstract

It is known that young female cancer survivors are at higher risk for decreased fertility and early menopause. Because the risk of these outcomes varies by age, cancer type, treatment regimen and other patient-specific characteristics, there is a need for valid tools for measuring and predicting reproductive function in this population. Ovarian reserve tests (ORT) include serum and ultrasound biomarkers used in characterizing healthy ovarian aging and predicting ovarian reserve prior to fertility treatment. This review summarizes efforts to translate ORT to use in female cancer patients. To date, small longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of young cancer patients demonstrate that gonadotoxic chemotherapy impact ORT. While follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B, antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume have all been demonstrated to change with exposure to gonadotoxic therapy, FSH, AMH and AFC appear to be the most sensitive. More data are needed to determine the long-term effect of hormonal agents from tamoxifen to GnRH agonists on ORT. The effect of unilateral oophorectomy acutely or in the long-term on ORT is not known. There are some early data postulating that cancer itself may impair ovarian reserve. Among cancer survivors, ORT correlate with amenorrhea. Even in young survivors with normal menstrual cycles, hormone and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve suggest decreased underlying ovarian reserve than age-matched healthy women. More studies are needed to determine the optimal time to test ORT in the large number of young survivors on combined estrogen and progesterone contraceptives. A significant utility of ORT would be to be able to predict fertility for young survivors, and there are no data on this outcome to date. The goal of future studies of ORT in young girls and women with cancer is to determine their utility as surrogate measures of ovarian function or predictors of infertility or ovarian failure. To do so, large-scale data need to be collected through cooperative group mechanisms. Epidemiologically, studies need to move from association studies to develop ORT into appropriate screening and predictive tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21178920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Endocrinol        ISSN: 0391-1977            Impact factor:   2.184


  10 in total

1.  Impact of CD4+ lymphocytes and HIV infection on Anti-Müllerian Hormone levels in a large cohort of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women.

Authors:  Rebecca Scherzer; Peter Bacchetti; Geralyn Messerlian; Johanna Goderre; Pauline M Maki; David B Seifer; Kathryn Anastos; Roksana Karim; Ruth M Greenblatt
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  A multidimensional scale to measure the reproductive concerns of young adult female cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jessica R Gorman; H Irene Su; John P Pierce; Samantha C Roberts; Sally A Dominick; Vanessa L Malcarne
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Pilot study on sex hormone levels and fertility in women with malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Matthias Preusser; Stefanie Seywald; Katarzyna Elandt; Christine Kurz; Andrea Rottenfusser; Karin Dieckmann; Gabriele Altorjai; Christoph C Zielinski; Christine Marosi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Experiencing reproductive concerns as a female cancer survivor is associated with depression.

Authors:  Jessica R Gorman; H Irene Su; Samantha C Roberts; Sally A Dominick; Vanessa L Malcarne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  How do you feel about fertility and parenthood? The voices of young female cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jessica R Gorman; Samantha Bailey; John P Pierce; H Irene Su
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Risk of recurrence and pregnancy outcomes in young women with breast cancer who do and do not undergo fertility preservation.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Megan E Tesch; Chloe Lim; Ying Hui Xu; Shaina Lee; Kirstin Perdizet; Dan Yokom; Ellen Warner; Jeffery Roberts; Caroline A Lohrisch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.624

7.  Impact of breast cancer on anti-mullerian hormone levels in young women.

Authors:  H I Su; S W Flatt; L Natarajan; A DeMichele; A Z Steiner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Caring for the breast cancer survivor's health and well-being.

Authors:  Petra M Casey; Stephanie S Faubion; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Margaret E Long; Sandhya Pruthi
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-10

9.  Cancer, fertility preservation, and future pregnancy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michelle L Matthews; Bradley S Hurst; Paul B Marshburn; Rebecca S Usadi; Margaret A Papadakis; Terry Sarantou
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-03-18

10.  Adverse reproductive health outcomes in a cohort of young women with breast cancer exposed to systemic treatments.

Authors:  Cristina Silva; Ana Cristina Ribeiro Rama; Sérgio Reis Soares; Mariana Moura-Ramos; Teresa Almeida-Santos
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.234

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.