Literature DB >> 21178649

Intraobserver agreement among endosonographers for endoscopic ultrasound features of chronic pancreatitis: a blinded multicenter study.

John G Lieb1, David T Palma, Cynthia W Garvan, Julia K Leblanc, Joseph Romagnuolo, James J Farrell, Thomas J Savides, Mohamad A Eloubeidi, Peter V Draganov, Chris E Forsmark, Mihir S Wagh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess intraobserver agreement among endosonographers for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features of chronic pancreatitis (CP).
METHODS: Thirty EUS images from patients with suspected CP were shown twice in random order to 5 blinded endosonographers. The following accepted features of CP were assessed: (1) hyperechoic foci, (2) hyperechoic strands, (3) lobularity, (4) cysts, (5) stones, (6) main pancreatic duct dilatation, (7) pancreatic duct irregularity, (8) hyperechoic duct margins, (9) visible side branches, and (10) overall assessment for CP. Intraobserver κ statistics were calculated for each endosonographer and for each feature. Interobserver κ was also calculated.
RESULTS: The mean intraobserver κ values were 0.82, 0.65, 0.71, 0.59, and 0.86 for the 5 endosonographers. The mean intraobserver κ values for each feature were (1) 0.66, (2) 0.67, (3) 0.70, (4) not calculable, (5) 0.96, (6) 0.81, (7) 0.77, (8) 0.69, (9) 0.51, and (10) 0.73. The mean interobserver κ values were 0.19, 0.07, 0.53, not calculable, 0.77, 0.77, 0.60, 0.34, 0.11, and 0.39, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was good intraobserver agreement in the interpretation of EUS features of CP. The intraobserver agreement seems better than the published interobserver agreement for EUS features of CP and better than the published intraobserver agreement for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography imaging for CP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21178649     DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182016a25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  5 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of diagnosing pancreatic fibrosis using EUS-elastography (comparison with surgical specimens).

Authors:  Yuya Itoh; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hajime Sumi; Daijuro Hayashi; Takamichi Kuwahara; Tomomasa Morishima; Kohei Funasaka; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Naoki Ohmiya; Yoshiaki Katano; Masatoshi Ishigami; Hidemi Goto; Yoshiki Hirooka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  EUS-derived criteria for distinguishing benign from malignant metastatic solid hepatic masses.

Authors:  Larissa L Fujii-Lau; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Marco J Bruno; Kenneth J Chang; John M DeWitt; Paul Fockens; David Forcione; Bertrand Napoleon; Laurent Palazzo; Mark D Topazian; Maurits J Wiersema; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan E Clain; Douglas O Faigel; Ferga C Gleeson; Robert Hawes; Prasad G Iyer; Elizabeth Rajan; Tyler Stevens; Michael B Wallace; Kenneth K Wang; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Matthew J DiMagno; Eugene P DiMagno
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 4.  Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Giancarlo Caletti; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Finding a needle in a haystack: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic masses in the setting of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Chencheng Xie; Kimberlee Bohy; Mohamed A Abdallah; Bhaveshkumar Patel; Morgan E Nelson; Jonathan Bleeker; Ryan Askeland; Ammar Abdullah; Khalil Aloreidi; Rabia Kiani; Muslim Atiq
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.