Literature DB >> 21177994

Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

K Fricke1, A A Seeber, N Thirugnanasambandam, W Paulus, M A Nitsche, J C Rothwell.   

Abstract

Several mechanisms have been proposed that control the amount of plasticity in neuronal circuits and guarantee dynamic stability of neuronal networks. Homeostatic plasticity suggests that the ease with which a synaptic connection is facilitated/suppressed depends on the previous amount of network activity. We describe how such homeostatic-like interactions depend on the time interval between two conditioning protocols and on the duration of the preconditioning protocol. We used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to produce short-lasting plasticity in the motor cortex of healthy humans. In the main experiment, we compared the aftereffect of a single 5-min session of anodal or cathodal tDCS with the effect of a 5-min tDCS session preceded by an identical 5-min conditioning session administered 30, 3, or 0 min beforehand. Five-minute anodal tDCS increases excitability for about 5 min. The same duration of cathodal tDCS reduces excitability. Increasing the duration of tDCS to 10 min prolongs the duration of the effects. If two 5-min periods of tDCS are applied with a 30-min break between them, the effect of the second period of tDCS is identical to that of 5-min stimulation alone. If the break is only 3 min, then the second session has the opposite effect to 5-min tDCS given alone. Control experiments show that these shifts in the direction of plasticity evolve during the 10 min after the first tDCS session and depend on the duration of the first tDCS but not on intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The results are compatible with a time-dependent "homeostatic-like" rule governing the response of the human motor cortex to plasticity probing protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21177994     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00608.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  84 in total

Review 1.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

Review 2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Dante Duarte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.635

3.  Serial treatments of primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke: characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders.

Authors:  James R Carey; Huiqiong Deng; Bernadette T Gillick; Jessica M Cassidy; David C Anderson; Lei Zhang; William Thomas
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Lasting modulation of in vitro oscillatory activity with weak direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  EEG-NIRS based assessment of neurovascular coupling during anodal transcranial direct current stimulation--a stroke case series.

Authors:  Anirban Dutta; Athira Jacob; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury; Abhijit Das; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.

Authors:  Claudia Ammann; Martin A Lindquist; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Xin Zheng; David C Alsop; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates visual motion adaptation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.