BACKGROUND:Dalcetrapib is a modulator of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity developed to raise levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) with the goal of further reduction of cardiovascular events additive to standard of care alone. In clinical studies, dalcetrapib has been shown to effectively increase levels of HDL-C with no significant safety concerns. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to investigate the safety of single ascending and multiple ascending doses of dalcetrapib at doses markedly greater than that intended therapeutically (600 mg/day). Secondary objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and dose proportionality of dalcetrapib. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, combined single and multiple ascending dose phase I study. Healthy males (age 18-65 years, body mass index 18-32 kg/m2) were randomized to four of five dalcetrapib doses (2100, 2700, 3300, 3900 or 4500 mg) or placebo, with ≥10 days washout between doses (n = 15, single ascending doses) or to dalcetrapib (1800, 2100, 3000 or 3900 mg once daily) or placebo for 7 days (four cohorts, each n = 10, randomization 8 : 2, multiple ascending doses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs and 12-lead ECG recordings. Primary pharmacokinetic assessments were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) [single doses] and AUC from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(24)) and C(max) (multiple doses). Pharmacodynamic assessments included CETP activity and lipids (multiple dosing only). RESULTS: Exposure increased with dose but was less than proportional to increasing dose after single dosing, although deviation from dose proportionality could not be demonstrated for C(max). Dose proportionality was consistent following multiple doses. Steady state was modelled to have been reached by approximately 4 days, with little to no accumulation. CETP activity reduction was dose dependent (maximum -55% after 3900 mg; placebo -2.6%) at 6 hours post-dose on day 1, while HDL-C increased by 12-19% (placebo -13%) on day 8 following treatment with 1800-3900 mg/day for 7 days. All AEs were mild or moderate in intensity and there were no serious AEs, deaths or withdrawals due to AEs. No clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters, cardiac parameters or vital signs were noted. CONCLUSION: Single-dose dalcetrapib up to 4500 mg and multiple doses up to 3900 mg were generally safe and well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Dalcetrapib is a modulator of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity developed to raise levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) with the goal of further reduction of cardiovascular events additive to standard of care alone. In clinical studies, dalcetrapib has been shown to effectively increase levels of HDL-C with no significant safety concerns. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to investigate the safety of single ascending and multiple ascending doses of dalcetrapib at doses markedly greater than that intended therapeutically (600 mg/day). Secondary objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and dose proportionality of dalcetrapib. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, combined single and multiple ascending dose phase I study. Healthy males (age 18-65 years, body mass index 18-32 kg/m2) were randomized to four of five dalcetrapib doses (2100, 2700, 3300, 3900 or 4500 mg) or placebo, with ≥10 days washout between doses (n = 15, single ascending doses) or to dalcetrapib (1800, 2100, 3000 or 3900 mg once daily) or placebo for 7 days (four cohorts, each n = 10, randomization 8 : 2, multiple ascending doses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs and 12-lead ECG recordings. Primary pharmacokinetic assessments were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) [single doses] and AUC from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(24)) and C(max) (multiple doses). Pharmacodynamic assessments included CETP activity and lipids (multiple dosing only). RESULTS: Exposure increased with dose but was less than proportional to increasing dose after single dosing, although deviation from dose proportionality could not be demonstrated for C(max). Dose proportionality was consistent following multiple doses. Steady state was modelled to have been reached by approximately 4 days, with little to no accumulation. CETP activity reduction was dose dependent (maximum -55% after 3900 mg; placebo -2.6%) at 6 hours post-dose on day 1, while HDL-C increased by 12-19% (placebo -13%) on day 8 following treatment with 1800-3900 mg/day for 7 days. All AEs were mild or moderate in intensity and there were no serious AEs, deaths or withdrawals due to AEs. No clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters, cardiac parameters or vital signs were noted. CONCLUSION: Single-dose dalcetrapib up to 4500 mg and multiple doses up to 3900 mg were generally safe and well tolerated.
Authors: Greetje J de Grooth; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Anton F H Stalenhoef; Jacqueline de Graaf; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jan L Posma; Arie van Tol; John J P Kastelein Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven E Nissen; Jean-Claude Tardif; Stephen J Nicholls; James H Revkin; Charles L Shear; William T Duggan; Witold Ruzyllo; William B Bachinsky; Gabriel P Lasala; Gregory P Lasala; E Murat Tuzcu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip J Barter; Mark Caulfield; Mats Eriksson; Scott M Grundy; John J P Kastelein; Michel Komajda; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Lori Mosca; Jean-Claude Tardif; David D Waters; Charles L Shear; James H Revkin; Kevin A Buhr; Marian R Fisher; Alan R Tall; Bryan Brewer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory G Schwartz; Anders G Olsson; Christie M Ballantyne; Phillip J Barter; Ingar M Holme; David Kallend; Lawrence A Leiter; Eran Leitersdorf; John J V McMurray; Prediman K Shah; Jean-Claude Tardif; Bernard R Chaitman; Regina Duttlinger-Maddux; John Mathieson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Eric J Niesor; Christine Magg; Naoto Ogawa; Hiroshi Okamoto; Elisabeth von der Mark; Hugues Matile; Georg Schmid; Roger G Clerc; Evelyne Chaput; Denise Blum-Kaelin; Walter Huber; Ralf Thoma; Philippe Pflieger; Makoto Kakutani; Daisuke Takahashi; Gregor Dernick; Cyrille Maugeais Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Evan A Stein; Erik S G Stroes; George Steiner; Brendan M Buckley; Alessandro M Capponi; Tracy Burgess; Eric J Niesor; David Kallend; John J P Kastelein Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Michiel L Bots; Frank L Visseren; Gregory W Evans; Ward A Riley; James H Revkin; Charles H Tegeler; Charles L Shear; William T Duggan; Ralph M Vicari; Diederick E Grobbee; John J Kastelein Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Meng Zhang; River Charles; Huimin Tong; Lei Zhang; Mili Patel; Francis Wang; Matthew J Rames; Amy Ren; Kerry-Anne Rye; Xiayang Qiu; Douglas G Johns; M Arthur Charles; Gang Ren Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Meng Zhang; Dongsheng Lei; Bo Peng; Mickey Yang; Lei Zhang; M Art Charles; Kerry-Anne Rye; Ronald M Krauss; Douglas G Johns; Gang Ren Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 4.698