Literature DB >> 21173353

Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Victoria Delgado1, Rutger J van Bommel, Matteo Bertini, C Jan Willem Borleffs, Nina Ajmone Marsan, C T Arnold, Gaetano Nucifora, Nico R L van de Veire, Claudia Ypenburg, Eric Boersma, Eduard R Holman, Martin J Schalij, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative merits of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, LV lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy remain unknown and were evaluated in the present study. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 397 ischemic heart failure patients, 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging was performed, with comprehensive assessment of LV radial dyssynchrony, identification of the segment with latest mechanical activation, and detection of myocardial scar in the segment where the LV lead was positioned. For LV dyssynchrony, a cutoff value of 130 milliseconds was used. Segments with <16.5% radial strain in the region of the LV pacing lead were considered to have extensive myocardial scar (>50% transmurality, validated in a subgroup with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging). The LV lead position was derived from chest x-ray. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure. Mean baseline LV radial dyssynchrony was 133±98 milliseconds. In 271 patients (68%), the LV lead was placed at the latest activated segment (concordant LV lead position), and the mean value of peak radial strain at the targeted segment was 18.9±12.6%. Larger LV radial dyssynchrony at baseline was an independent predictor of superior long-term survival (hazard ratio, 0.995; P=0.001), whereas a discordant LV lead position (hazard ratio, 2.086; P=0.001) and myocardial scar in the segment targeted by the LV lead (hazard ratio, 2.913; P<0.001) were independent predictors of worse outcome. Addition of these 3 parameters yielded incremental prognostic value over the combination of clinical parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline LV radial dyssynchrony, discordant LV lead position, and myocardial scar in the region of the LV pacing lead were independent determinants of long-term prognosis in ischemic heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Larger baseline LV dyssynchrony predicted superior long-term survival, whereas discordant LV lead position and myocardial scar predicted worse outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21173353     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.945345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  78 in total

1.  An early proof-of-concept of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Martial G Bourassa; Paul Khairy; Denis Roy
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-26

2.  Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.

Authors:  Steven Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Nuclear image-guided left ventricular pacing lead navigation feasibility of a new technique.

Authors:  Daniel R Ludwig; Prahlad G Menon; David Schwartzman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  The prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Himanshu Aggarwal; Wael A AlJaroudi; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn Mannon; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Baseline asynchrony, assessed circumferentially using temporal uniformity of strain, besides coincidence between site of latest mechanical activation and presumed left ventricular lead position, predicts favourable prognosis after resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Cavallino; Elisa Rondano; Andrea Magnani; Lucia Leva; Eugenio Inglese; Gabriele Dell'era; Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo N Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Impact of scar on SPECT assay of left ventricular contraction dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Daniel R Ludwig; Mati Friehling; Erik B Schelbert; David Schwartzman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Not left ventricular lead position, but the extent of immediate asynchrony reduction predicts long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wolfram C Poller; Henryk Dreger; Marius Schwerg; Hansjürgen Bondke; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.