Literature DB >> 21172485

Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients: a multiinstitutional study.

Vinod H Thourani1, Gorav Ailawadi, Wilson Y Szeto, Todd M Dewey, Robert A Guyton, Michael J Mack, Irving L Kron, Patrick Kilgo, Joseph E Bavaria.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of transcatheter aortic valves has focused attention on outcomes after open aortic valve replacement (AVR) in very high-risk patients. This study analyzes the short-term and midterm outcomes of AVR in this patient cohort in the current surgical era.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 159 patients who underwent isolated, primary AVR with a STS PROM (Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality) of 10% or greater from January 2002 to December 2007 at four US academic institutions. Patients with previous valve operations were excluded. A multivariable model was constructed to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Estimates of the cumulative event rate mortality were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 76.1±11.2 years, most were men (92 of 159, 57.9%), and mean STS PROM was 16.3%±7.3%. Significant preoperative factors included the following: peripheral vascular disease, 33.3% (53 of 159); stroke, 23.3% (37 of 159); renal failure, 50.3% (80 of 159); New York Heart Association class III-IV heart failure, 78.0% (124 of 159); and previous coronary artery bypass grafting, 39.0% (62 of 159). Mean ejection fraction was 0.461±0.153 and median implanted valve size was 23 mm. Postoperative complications included the following: stroke, 4.4% (7 of 159); heart block, 5.0% (8 of 159); multisystem organ failure, 6.9% (11 of 159); pneumonia, 7.5% (12 of 159); and dialysis, 8.2% (13 of 159). Postoperative length of stay was 12.6±11.0 days and in-hospital mortality was 16.4% (26 of 159). One-, three-, and 5-year survival was 70.9%, 56.8%, and 47.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current era, high-risk surgical patients undergoing open AVR have respectable short and mid-term survival. These results should serve as a benchmark for evaluating outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21172485     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  19 in total

1.  Impact of New York Heart Association classification, advanced age and patient-prosthesis mismatch on outcomes in aortic valve replacement surgery.

Authors:  Alex Zapolanski; Andrew W C Mak; Giovanni Ferrari; Christopher Johnson; Richard E Shaw; Mariano E Brizzio; Jason S Sperling; Juan B Grau
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Clinical and prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Pablo Salinas; Raúl Moreno; Luis Calvo; Santiago Jiménez-Valero; Guillermo Galeote; Angel Sánchez-Recalde; Teresa López-Fernández; Sergio Garcia-Blas; Diego Iglesias; Luis Riera; Isidro Moreno-Gómez; Jose María Mesa; Ignacio Plaza; Rocio Ayala; Rosa Gonzalez; José-Luis López-Sendón
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-26

3.  The versatility of transapical access: Will it lead to a completely new approach to valvular therapy?

Authors:  Christian Shults; Rebecca Gunter; Vinod H Thourani
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Perspective on the cost-effectiveness of transapical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: Outcomes of a decision-analytic model.

Authors:  Hemal Gada; Shikhar Agarwal; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Aortic root sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a shape model parameterisation.

Authors:  Bart Bosmans; Toon Huysmans; Patricia Lopes; Eva Verhoelst; Tim Dezutter; Peter de Jaegere; Jan Sijbers; Jos Vander Sloten; Johan Bosmans
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Francesco Nicolini; Daniela Fortuna; Giovanni Andrea Contini; Davide Pacini; Davide Gabbieri; Rossana De Palma; Tiziano Gherli
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 7.  Advances in transcatheter valve therapies.

Authors:  Daniel H Steinberg; Mario Castillo-Sang; Eric R Powers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Safety and efficiency assessment of training Canadian cardiac surgery residents to perform aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Kuan-chin J Chen; Corey Adams; Larry W Stitt; L R Guo
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Review of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Ricardo Boix-Garibo; Mohammed Mohsin Uzzaman; Vinayak Nilkanth Bapat
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-09

10.  Intensive insulin therapy to maintain normoglycemia after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G Van den Berghe
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.