Literature DB >> 21171804

Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.

Bernhard Pastötter1, Sabine Schicker, Julia Niedernhuber, Karl-Heinz T Bäuml.   

Abstract

In multiple-list learning, retrieval during learning has been suggested to improve recall of the single lists by enhancing list discrimination and, at test, reducing interference. Using electrophysiological, oscillatory measures of brain activity, we examined to what extent retrieval during learning facilitates list encoding. Subjects studied 5 lists of items in anticipation of a final cumulative recall test and did either a retrieval or a no-retrieval task between study of the lists. Retrieval was from episodic memory (recall of the previous list), semantic memory (generation of exemplars from an unrelated category), or short-term memory (2-back task). Behaviorally, all 3 forms of retrieval enhanced recall of both previously and subsequently studied lists. Physiologically, the results showed an increase of alpha power (8-14 Hz) from List 1 to List 5 encoding when no retrieval activities were interpolated but no such increase when any of the 3 retrieval activities occurred. Brain-behavior correlations showed that alpha-power dynamics from List 1 to List 5 encoding predicted subsequent recall performance. The results suggest that, without intermittent retrieval, encoding becomes ineffective across lists. In contrast, with intermittent retrieval, there is a reset of the encoding process for each single list that makes encoding of later lists as effective as encoding of early lists. 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21171804     DOI: 10.1037/a0021801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  30 in total

1.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.

Authors:  Magdalena Abel; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  Competition dependence of retrieval-induced forgetting in motor memory.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Alp Aslan; Christian Frings
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

4.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  List-method directed forgetting: the forget cue improves both encoding and retrieval of postcue information.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Oliver Kliegl; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

6.  Oscillatory correlates of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff in a response-conflict task.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Franziska Berchtold; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Timothy R Alexander; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

8.  Testing enhances motor practice.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Christian Frings
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

9.  Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar; Novall Y Khan; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.